SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Speech Perception”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 109 records · Page 6Linked to original sources

PubMed1997

Are spiral ganglion cell numbers important for speech perception with a cochlear implant?

OBJECTIVE: Studies of factors affecting the survival of ganglion cells in adults with profound hearing loss and speech perception in cochlear implant users are reviewed in order to assess the hypothesis that ganglion cell numbers have a strong influence on the level of speech perception achieved by adult implant users. DATA SOURCES: All histopathologic data have been published as tables or figures in refereed papers. Speech perception data were collected from published papers and directly from clinics and from Cochlear Corporation's database. STUDY SELECTION: Histopathologic studies with reasonably large groups of patients were selected. The speech perception data were from the largest study available. DATA EXTRACTION: All data used have been published in refereed journals of high repute. No other assessment of quality or validity was available to the author. DATA SYNTHESIS: Trends in the speech perception data were compared qualitatively and quantitatively with trends in the histopathologic ganglion cell data. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis found no strong evidence that spiral ganglion cell numbers have a strong influence on the level of speech perception achieved with a cochlear implant. A possible explanation for this surprising result may be that the minimum number of cells required for good speech perception is quite low, and the majority of implant users exceed this minimum requirement.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2002

Speech perception using maps based on neural response telemetry measures.

OBJECTIVE: To determine how speech perception is affected for Nucleus cochlear implant users when their speech processor is programmed using neural response telemetry (NRT) measures rather than traditional behavioral estimates of threshold and maximum comfort level. DESIGN: Electrically evoked compound action potential (EAP) thresholds were measured for a group of 10 adult Nucleus cochlear implant users. These physiologic threshold estimates were used to create three SPEAK MAPs. One MAP ("+10/-20 MAP") was created using only the NRT data. The second MAP ("Combined MAP") was created using a combination of both EAP thresholds and a single behavioralmeasure of threshold and maximum comfort level from electrode 10. A third MAP ("Measured MAP") was created using standard programming techniques. Speech perception was then assessed using each of these three MAPs for either CUNY or HINT sentences presented at two different presentation levels (70 dB SPL and 55 dB SPL). RESULTS: On average, at the higher presentation level (70 dB SPL) subjects performed significantly better when using the Measured MAP than whenusing either of the NRT-based MAPs. No significant difference in speech perception was obtained for either of the three MAPs when the lower presentation level (55 dB SPL) was used. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that at relatively high presentation levels, speech perception scores obtained by subjects who use MAPs based solely or primarily on EAP thresholds ar eslightly lower than similar scores obtained using a more traditional MAP. This difference did not reach statistical significance at lower presentation levels. We interpret these findings in a positive light to suggest that although NRT-based MAPs may not be optimal, they are of sufficient quality to support reasonable levels of speech understanding. This is important to establish because these MAPs may prove to be most useful when very young children receive a cochlear implant.

Brain↗

PubMed2007

Hearing lips and seeing voices: how cortical areas supporting speech production mediate audiovisual speech perception.

Observing a speaker's mouth profoundly influences speech perception. For example, listeners perceive an "illusory" "ta" when the video of a face producing /ka/ is dubbed onto an audio /pa/. Here, we show how cortical areas supporting speech production mediate this illusory percept and audiovisual (AV) speech perception more generally. Specifically, cortical activity during AV speech perception occurs in many of the same areas that are active during speech production. We find that different perceptions of the same syllable and the perception of different syllables are associated with different distributions of activity in frontal motor areas involved in speech production. Activity patterns in these frontal motor areas resulting from the illusory "ta" percept are more similar to the activity patterns evoked by AV(/ta/) than they are to patterns evoked by AV(/pa/) or AV(/ka/). In contrast to the activity in frontal motor areas, stimulus-evoked activity for the illusory "ta" in auditory and somatosensory areas and visual areas initially resembles activity evoked by AV(/pa/) and AV(/ka/), respectively. Ultimately, though, activity in these regions comes to resemble activity evoked by AV(/ta/). Together, these results suggest that AV speech elicits in the listener a motor plan for the production of the phoneme that the speaker might have been attempting to produce, and that feedback in the form of efference copy from the motor system ultimately influences the phonetic interpretation.

Auditory Perception↗

PubMed1986

Developmental changes in visual and auditory contributions to speech perception.

Previous research has demonstrated that listeners make use of both auditory and visual information in bimodal speech perception. Preschool children appear to evaluate and integrate the two sources of information in the same manner as adults, but the children are less influenced by the visual source. The current experiments test a possible explanation of this difference and extend the question to younger children. It is possible that children are poorer lip-readers than adults and thus have less complete information about the visual source. Children and adults were tested with both auditory and visual sources and were also required to identify speech events on the basis of only the visual source. In addition to replicating the previous findings in the bimodal situation, the current experiments found that children are poorer lip-readers than adults. Furthermore, a positive correlation was observed between lip-reading ability and the size of the visual contribution to bimodal speech perception. A fuzzy logical model of speech perception provided a good quantitative description of the results even with the assumption that the visual information was equivalent in both the bimodal and lip-reading conditions. The results also contradict the categorical perception of speech events and any nonindependence in the evaluation of auditory and visual information in speech perception.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2000

The development of speech perception in children using cochlear implants: effects of etiologic factors and delayed milestones.

HYPOTHESIS: Speech perception outcomes for cochlear implantation of children vary over a wide range, and it is hypothesized that central pathologic states associated with certain causes of hearing impairment account for a substantial part of the variance. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective analysis was carried out to ascertain the relationships between speech perception, etiologic factors, and central pathologic states as indicated by preoperative delayed motor milestones and/or cognitive delays. SETTING: Data were obtained from the pre- and postoperative records of patients attending a hospital cochlear implant clinic. PATIENTS: Results for 75 consecutive patients up to age 5 years who underwent implantation were included in the study. INTERVENTION: Patients received a 22-electrode cochlear prosthesis and were seen by the clinic for regular tune-up and assessments. Home- and school-based habilitation was recommended by the clinic. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Speech perception measures were classified on a five-point scale to allow for different evaluation procedures at different ages and developmental stages. RESULTS: The incidence of motor and cognitive delays were fairly evenly spread across etiologic factors, except for cytomegalovirus, which had a much higher than average incidence. Children with motor and/or cognitive delays were significantly slower than other children in the development of speech perception skills after implantation. Etiologic factors did not have a statistically significant effect on speech perception outcome. CONCLUSIONS: It is likely that central pathologic states account for a substantial part of the variance among children using cochlear implants. Specific indicators of central pathologic states should be used to assess a child's prognosis in preference to less specific information based on etiologic factors alone.

Child, Preschool↗

PubMed2002

The effects of age on auditory speech perception development in cochlear-implanted prelingually deaf children.

One of the most important factors in auditory speech perception of cochlear-implanted children is age. The goal of this study was to compare auditory speech perception among children implanted from 6 different age groups: 0 to 3, 4 to 5, 6 to 7, 8 to 9, 10 to 11, and >12 years. The subjects of this study were matched based on socioeconomic status, residual hearing before cochlear implantation, the kinds of cochlear implant device, speech processing strategy, communication mode after implantation, and primary language in family. All of them have used the device minimally for 2 years. The subjects were tested with a range of closed and open-set auditory speech perception tests, and the levels of auditory speech perception in different age groups were compared. Results showed that the children who received an implant at 0 to 3 years of age had maximum auditory speech perception.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2003

Monosyllable speech perception of Japanese hearing aid users with prelingual hearing loss: implications for surgical indication of cochlear implant.

OBJECTIVE: The monosyllable speech perception ability after years of educational intervention was compared between prelingually deafened pediatric hearing aid users and their cochlear implant counterparts. DESIGN: An open-set monosyllabic speech perception test was conducted on all subjects. The test required subjects to indicate a corresponding Japanese character to that spoken by the examiner. Fifty-two subjects with prelingual hearing impairment (47 hearing aid users and 5 cochlear implant users) were examined. RESULTS: Hearing aid users with average pure-tone thresholds less than 90 dB HL demonstrated generally better monosyllable perception than 70%, which was equivalent or better performance than that of the cochlear implant group. Widely dispersed speech perception was observed within the 90-99 dB HL hearing-aid user group with most subjects demonstrating less than 50% speech perception. In the cluster of >100 dB HL, few cases demonstrated more than 50% in speech perception. The perception ability of the vowel part of each mora within the cochlear implant group was 100% and corresponding to that of hearing aid users with moderate and severe hearing loss. CONCLUSION: Hearing ability among cochlear implant users can be comparable with that of hearing aid users with average unaided pure-tone thresholds of 90 dB HL, after monosyllabic speech perception testing was performed.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2006

Speech perception for adults who use hearing aids in conjunction with cochlear implants in opposite ears.

This study aimed to (a) investigate the effect of using a hearing aid in conjunction with a cochlear implant in opposite ears on speech perception in quiet and in noise, (b) identify the speech information obtained from a hearing aid that is additive to the information obtained from a cochlear implant, and (c) explore the relationship between aided thresholds in the nonimplanted ear and speech perception benefit from wearing a hearing aid in conjunction with a cochlear implant in opposite ears. Fourteen adults who used the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant system in 1 ear participated in the study. All participants had either used a hearing aid in the nonimplanted ear for at least 75% of waking hours after cochlear implantation, and/or, hearing loss less than 90 dB HL in the low frequencies in the nonimplanted ear. Speech perception was evaluated in 3 conditions: cochlear implant alone (CI), hearing aid alone (HA), and cochlear implant in conjunction with hearing aid in opposite ears (CIHA). Three speech perception tests were used: consonant-vowel nucleus-consonant (CNC) words in quiet, City University of New York style (CUNY) sentences in coincident signal and noise, and spondees in coincidental and spatially separated signal and noise. Information transmission analyses were performed on the CNC responses. Of the 14 participants tested, 6 showed significant bimodal benefit on open-set speech perception measures and 5 showed benefit on close-set spondees. However, 2 participants showed poorer speech perception with CIHA than CI in at least 1 of the speech perception tests. Results of information transmission analyses showed that bimodal benefit (performance with CIHA minus that with CI) in quiet arises from improved perception of the low frequency components in speech. Results showed that participants with poorer aided thresholds in the mid-to-high frequencies demonstrated greater bimodal benefit. It is possible that the mid-to-high frequency information provided by the hearing aids may be conflicting with the cochlear implants.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

Effect of residual hearing prior to cochlear implantation on speech perception in children.

We examined the impact of residual hearing prior to cochlear implantation on pre- and postimplantation speech perception outcomes in children. Stimulation of the auditory system prior to implantation because of the presence of residual hearing is important for development of the central auditory pathways, whereas, in the absence of such stimulation, the pathways show less development. We hypothesized that children who had some degree of residual hearing preimplantation achieve better speech perception skills than their peers with poorer hearing. From the 133 children followed in our program, we identified 37 children who had an audiometric pure-tone average of better than 95 dB HL in the better ear at any time preimplantation. Psychophysical speech perception measures, the Word Identification Picture Inventory and the Phonetically Balanced Kindergarten list, in these children were compared with those of 96 implanted children who had poorer hearing prior to implantation. Children with more residual hearing showed higher speech perception scores both before implantation and over their first year of implant use than children with poorer hearing, suggesting that there is an advantage in having a greater degree of residual hearing preimplantation. We suggest that this advantage is promoted, in part, by the greater potential for auditory stimulation provided by high-gain hearing aids in children with greater degrees of residual hearing. This advantage appears to be maintained at least over 1 year postimplantation, yet the rates of development of postimplantation speech perception are not different between the groups. We suggest that this may be due to the unique aspects of electrical stimulation from a cochlear implant. Our findings suggest that it is important to minimize the delay of speech perception skills in the preimplantation phase, particularly in children with poor residual hearing. This can be accomplished by implanting children with congenital severe to profound hearing loss at young ages and children with acquired hearing loss soon after the onset. Also, auditory stimulation prior to implantation should be maximized through the consistent use of hearing aids and therapy that emphasizes development of auditory skills.

Child↗

PubMed1999

Speech perception results in children with cochlear implants: contributing factors.

Speech perception test results were obtained from a group of 40 pediatric cochlear implant users. Half of the children participated in oral-only habilitation programs, which included both traditional oral and auditory-verbal approaches, and half participated in programs that used a combination of oral and manual communication referred to as total communication (TC). Analysis of the scores showed that children enrolled in oral-only habilitation programs scored significantly higher on the speech perception measures than did children who were enrolled in total communication based programs. These results were inconsistent with those of other reports, which suggested that communication methods had little effect on implant outcomes. To further examine the reasons for the differences in performance, we analyzed 7 additional factors, including length of implant use, age at surgery, device type, socioeconomic status, bilingualism, school setting, and participation in private therapy, which may affect implant performance. Multiple-regression analysis again showed communication mode to be the factor most highly correlated with speech perception abilities among this group of children.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2003

The effects of attention on speech perception: an fMRI study.

Focusing of attention to a specific speech source plays an important role in everyday speech perception. However, little is known of the neuronal substrates of focused attention in speech perception. Thus, the present study investigated the effects on neuronal activation of directed attention to auditory stimuli that differed in semantic content. Using an event-related fMRI protocol, single vowels, three-phoneme pseudowords and three- and four-phoneme real nouns and words were randomly presented to the subjects during four different instructional conditions. One condition was passive listening without any specific instructions of focusing of attention. The other conditions were attention focused on either the vowels, the pseudowords or the words. Thus, the acoustic stimulation was constant across conditions. The subjects were 13 healthy adults. Functional MRI was performed with a 1.5 T scanner, using an event-related design. During passive listening, there were significant activations bilaterally in the superior temporal gyrus. Instruction to attend to the pseudowords caused activation in middle temporal lobe areas, extending more anterior compared to the activations seen during passive listening. Instruction to attend to the vowel sounds caused an increase in activation in the superior/medial temporal lobe, with a leftward asymmetry. Instruction to attend to the words caused a leftward asymmetry, particularly in the middle and superior temporal gyri. It is concluded that attention plays a modulatory role in neuronal activation to speech sounds, producing specific activations to specific stimulus categories that may act to facilitate speech perception.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Speech perception in individuals with auditory neuropathy.

PURPOSE: Speech perception in participants with auditory neuropathy (AN) was systematically studied to answer the following 2 questions: Does noise present a particular problem for people with AN? Can clear speech and cochlear implants alleviate this problem? METHOD: The researchers evaluated the advantage in intelligibility of clear speech over conversational speech in 13 participants with AN. Of these participants, 7 had received a cochlear implant. Eight sentence-recognition experiments were conducted to examine the clear speech advantage in 2 listening conditions (quiet and noise) using 4 stimulation modes (monaural acoustic, diotic acoustic, monaural electric, and binaurally combined acoustic and electric stimulation). RESULTS: Participants with AN performed more poorly in speech recognition in noise than did the normal-hearing, cochlear-impaired, and cochlear implant controls. A significant clear speech advantage was observed, ranging from 9 to 23 percentage points in intelligibility for all listening conditions and stimulation modes. Electric stimulation via a cochlear implant produced significantly higher intelligibility than acoustic stimulation in both quiet and in noise. Binaural hearing with either diotic acoustic stimulation or combined acoustic and electric stimulation produced significantly higher intelligibility than monaural stimulation in quiet but not in noise. CONCLUSIONS: Participants with AN most likely derive the clear speech advantage from enhanced temporal properties in clear speech and improved neural synchrony with electric stimulation. Although the present result supports cochlear implantation as one treatment choice for people with AN, it suggests that the use of innovative hearing aids may be another viable option to improve speech perception in noise.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed2003

Speech perception after cochlear implantation over a 4-year time period.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term speech perception of cochlear implantees and to compare the developing auditory performance patterns of prelingual children and postlingual deaf adults. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-nine prelingually deaf children and 17 postlingually deaf adults who had been followed up for 4 years were included in the study. Speech perception ability was assessed by means of vowel and consonant confusion tests and the Korean version of the Central Institute of Deafness (K-CID) test (performed without visual cues). The test results were analyzed at 3 and 6 months after implantation and then annually. RESULTS: In the prelingually deaf children, the average results continuously improved over the 4-year period. In the postlingually deaf adults, the average results did not improve further after the first 2 years. Individuals with < 5 years of deafness had a faster rate of recovery of speech perception than those who had been deaf for > 5 years. The K-CID scores were negatively correlated with age at implantation for the prelingually deaf group and with the duration of deafness in the postlingually deaf group. Children fitted with implants at a younger age showed better speech perception ability than those fitted with implants at an older age. Interestingly, prelingually deaf children aged 5-7 years at implantation showed the widest variation in individual outcomes. Amongst this group of children with highly variable outcomes, the metabolic status of brain cortices determined by means of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) was available for three patients. The individual with the widest hypometabolic area had the best speech perception ability. CONCLUSION: The extent of hypometabolism as assessed by FDG-PET seemed to be one of the major factors predicting the outcome of cochlear implantation.

Adult↗

PubMed1991

Effect of age at onset of deafness on children's speech perception abilities with a cochlear implant.

The speech perception abilities of 37 children with cochlear implants (single-channel or multichannel) were examined as a function of age at onset of deafness. There was no significant difference in the speech perception abilities of implanted children who were born deaf and those of implanted children who lost their hearing during the first 3 years of life. In contrast, the performance of children whose age at onset of deafness was 5 years or later was significantly better than that of the children with congenital or early-acquired deafness on tests of stress pattern categorization, closed-set word identification, open-set identification of common phrases, and lipreading enhancement.

Age Factors↗

PubMed1990

An examination of two procedures for assessing the speech perception of phonologically disordered children.

Speech perception is an important variable in children's production of speech sounds, yet commercially available tests of speech-sound discrimination have been criticized for their lack of validity and clinical value. The present study was undertaken to examine two alternative procedures for assessing children's perception of their own error sounds to determine if the procedures have clinical applicability and if they elicit comparable results. Implications of results are discussed.

Articulation Disorders↗

PubMed2000

Determinants of speech perception in children after cochlear implantation.

BACKGROUND: Cochlear implants provide access to the speech signal in those profoundly deaf children who derive no material benefit from acoustic hearing aids. Speech perception after implantation can vary widely--we have analysed the contribution of several factors. METHODS: We examined 40 children with mean age at implantation of 52 months who were either born deaf or became deaf before 3 years. All patients received the same multichannel implant system and were followed up for 5 years. We used connected discourse tracking (CDT) as the measure of speech perception. The effect of five potential predictors (age at implantation, number of inserted electrodes, origin of deafness, mode of communication, and socioeconomic group) on speech perception was analysed. FINDINGS: The mean number of words per minute perceived increased from 0 before implantation to 44.8 (SD 24.3) 5 years after implantation. Repeated-measures ANOVA showed that children significantly progressed over time (p=0.001). Age at implantation was a significant covariate (p=0.01) and mode of communication was a significant between-individuals factor (p=0.04). INTERPRETATION: Young age at intervention and oral communication mode are the most important known determinants of later speech perception in young children after cochlear implantation. Early identification of candidate children necessitates implementation of universal neonatal screening programmes for hearing impairment.

Child, Preschool↗

PubMed1998

Right hemisphere speech perception revealed by amobarbital injection and electrical interference.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the right hemispheric speech perception capabilities of an adult right-handed patient with seizures. METHODS: Consecutive, unilateral, intracarotid sodium amobarbital injections and left hemispheric electrical interference mapping were used to determine lateralization and localization of speech perception, measured as syllable discrimination. RESULTS: Syllable discrimination remained intact after left and right intracarotid sodium amobarbital injections. Language otherwise strongly lateralized to the left hemisphere. Despite evidence of bilateral speech perception capabilities, electrical interference testing in the left posterior temporal lobe impaired syllable discrimination. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest a functionally symmetric, parallel system in the adult brain with preferential use of left hemispheric pathways for speech perception.

Adult↗

PubMed1997

The effect of language knowledge on speech perception: what are we really assessing?

OBJECTIVE: The authors examined whether open-set speech perception scores are limited by knowledge of vocabulary and syntax and further considered whether remediation of vocabulary and syntax will increase open-set speech perception scores. STUDY DESIGN: This was a repeated-measures study design in the setting of a primary (elementary) school for the hearing-impaired. PATIENTS: The study population was composed of three hearing-impaired children using Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant. INTERVENTION: Intervention used was language remediation sessions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measures were assessment of auditory-alone speech perception benefit using open-set words and sentences and assessment of syntactic knowledge using the Test of Syntactic Ability. Outcome measures were applied before and after remediation. RESULTS: Child 1 and child 2 showed a significant postremediation improvement in their overall scores on the Test of Syntactic Ability and in their ability to perceive words learned during remediation. Child 1 and child 2 also showed a significant improvement in their scores on a modified Bamford-Kowal-Bench open-set sentence test, which specifically targeted grammatical constructs trained in remediation sessions. CONCLUSIONS: Remediation of language knowledge deficits significantly improved open-set speech perception for two children, suggesting a need to include language remediation in cochlear implant habilitation programs.

Adolescent↗