PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “MOTION PERCEPTION”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 127 records · Page 7Linked to original sources

[An experiment on the theory of visual motion perception].

Two classes of theories of motion perception were studied: correlation and gradient models (in the sense of D. Marr). Random-dot kinematograms with a shifted square were presented to subjects, and the 80% threshold for detection of correct direction of movement was determined. Correlation models predict scale invariance, that is, a constant shift measured in units of texture elements of the translated pattern in spite of a geometric magnification. This was refuted for all subjects. The increase of the recognizable translation with the area of the translated form was verified except for the patterns with the largest texture elements (8 minutes of arc). This prediction, however, is not very specific for competing theories. Gradient models are not yet fully specified, and they contain some free parameters. They cannot be tested strictly, but there exist reasonable numerical parameter values by which our data can be satisfactorily explained.

Adult↗

Object-motion detection affected by concurrent self-motion perception: psychophysics of a new phenomenon.

Thresholds for object-motion detection are significantly raised when concurrent self-motion perception is induced by either vestibular, or visual, or cervico-somatosensory stimulation. Active sinusoidal horizontal head oscillations with compensatory vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) and foveal or eccentrical target presentation; 'passive' head movements with fixation suppression of the VOR; pure body oscillations with the head fixed in space (cervical stimulation); optokinetically induced apparent self-motion (circularvection). This new visual phenomenon of a physiological 'inhibitory interaction' between object- and self-motion perception seems to have a somatosensory motor analogue. It may reflect the disadventageous side effect due to unspecificness of an otherwise beneficial space constancy mechanism, which provides us with the image of a stable world during locomotion.

Adolescent↗

Postural control as a function of self- and object-motion perception.

The goals of this study were to examine the visual information influence on body sway as a function of self- and object-motion perception and visual information quality. Participants that were aware (object-motion) and unaware (self-motion) of the movement of a moving room were asked to stand upright at five different distances from its frontal wall. The visual information effect on body sway decreased when participants were aware about the sensory manipulation. Moreover, while the visual influence on body sway decreased as the distance increased in the self-motion perception, no effects were observed in the object-motion mode. The overall results indicate that postural control system functioning can be altered by prior knowledge, and adaptation due to changes in sensory quality seem to occur in the self- but not in the object-motion perception mode.

Adult↗

Motion perception of saccade-induced retinal translation.

Active visual perception relies on the ability to interpret correctly retinal motion signals induced either by moving objects viewed with static eyes or by stationary objects viewed with moving eyes. A motionless environment is not normally perceived as moving during saccadic eye movements. It is commonly believed that this phenomenon involves central oculomotor signals that inhibit intrasaccadic visual motion processing. The keystone of this extraretinal theory relies on experimental reports showing that physically stationary scenes displayed only during saccades, thus producing high retinal velocities, are never perceived as moving but appear as static blurred images. We, however, provide evidence that stimuli optimized for high-speed motion detection elicit clear motion perception against saccade direction, thus making the search for extraretinal suppression superfluous. The data indicate that visual motion is the main cue used by observers to perform the task independently of other perceptual factors covarying with intrasaccadic stimulation. By using stimuli of different durations, we show that the probability of perceiving the stimulus as static, rather than moving, increases when the intrasaccadic stimulation is preceded or followed by a significant extrasaccadic stimulation. We suggest that intrasaccadic motion perception is accomplished by motion-selective magnocellular neurons through temporal integration of rapidly increasing retinal velocities. The functional mechanism that usually prevents this intrasaccadic activity from being perceived seems to rely on temporal masking effects induced by the static retinal images present before and/or after the saccade.

Humans↗

Monocular motion sensing, binocular motion perception.

The two-process account of motion perception and its binocular organization were addressed in experiments on apparent movement (AM) with three types of grating: sinusoidal; random bar width; and square-wave with missing fundamental (MF). Monocular MF gratings sampled four times per cycle of drift always appeared to move backwards. Here AM was unrelated to the spatial appearance of the pattern, and followed the motion of the dominant spatial frequency component (the third harmonic). We take this reversed AM to be characteristic of "short-range" motion sensors. It did not occur dichoptically, implying that the direction-selective mechanism of motion sensors is purely monocular. AM was seen with dichoptic presentation for all three types of grating. Performance improved with the length of the stimulus sequence, as predicted by probability summation. This result reconciles previous positive and negative findings on dichoptic AM. The perceived direction of dichoptic AM was consistent with polarity-selective matching of features over time (the "long-range process"). The most telling effect supporting feature-matching in dichoptic motion was that dichoptic MF motion reversed direction with a change in the visible features of the pattern (induced by changes in contrast and pulse duration); monocular apparent motion did not. Two routes from spatial frequency channels to the perception of object motion are discussed.

Contrast Sensitivity↗

Attention mechanisms for multi-location first- and second-order motion perception.

We applied the external noise plus attention paradigm to study attention mechanisms involved in concurrent first-order and second-order motion perception at two spatial locations. Cued to attend to one of the locations, the observer was instructed to independently judge direction of motion of either first-order (Experiment 1) or second-order (Experiment 2) motion stimuli at both locations in every trial. Across trials, systematically controlled amounts of external noise were added to the motion displays. We measured motion threshold at three performance criteria in every attention x external noise condition. We find that observers could, without any loss, simultaneously compute first-order motion direction at two widely separated spatial locations across a broad range of external noise conditions. However, considerable loss occurred at the unattended location in processing second-order motion direction at two separated spatial locations. We conclude that, under the conditions investigated in the current study, (1) in first-order motion perception, the visual system could simultaneously process motion direction at two widely separated locations without any capacity limitation; (2) in second-order motion perception, attending to a spatial location enhances stimulus contrast at that location by a factor of about 1.37 (or equivalently, reduces the internal additive noise by a factor of about 0.73).

Attention↗

Absence of smooth motion perception in color vision.

We have tested the behavioral evidence for a separation of the processing of color contrast from motion in the human visual system. Two different aspects of motion perception are examined; the identification of the direction of movement of a chromatic grating and the perception of smooth motion. The results show that color vision is at no great disadvantage in the identification of direction of movement, since this can be done at color contrasts quite close to detection threshold over a wide range of spatial and temporal frequencies. However, we find that subjects can identify direction without having the genuine perception of smooth motion. Smooth motion perception is revealed to be highly impaired since it is detected only at very high color contrasts and over a narrow range of spatial temporal conditions.

Color Perception↗

Second-order motion perception in peripheral vision: limits of early filtering.

Spatial and temporal analysis of contrast-modulated sine-wave gratings reveals that the second-order motion stimulus contains two sidebands, with equal energy but moving in opposite directions, flanking a stationary carrier. Any early linear spatial filtering process in the visual system that attenuates one sideband more than the other will be detrimental to the balance between the two sidebands, so that the perceived direction of the carrier might be opposite to that of the envelope motion. We tested this hypothesis by using contrast-modulated gratings presented centrally or at 20 deg in the horizontal nasal field with a two-alternative forced-choice staircase paradigm. We found that when the envelope frequency was close to that of the carrier, a second-order stimulus whose envelope motion direction was correctly identified in the fovea appeared to drift in the opposite direction in the periphery. Further increasing the envelope spatial frequency resulted in a reversed motion percept in both central and peripheral viewing conditions. For subjects to identify correctly the direction of motion of the envelope, the spatial frequency ratio of the carrier to the envelope had to be more than 2 in the fovea and more than 6 in the periphery. These phenomena in second-order motion perception can be explained by a linear model of motion detection with an early spatial filtering process. Further experiments and computer simulation show that undersampling of the carrier has little effect on second-order motion perception in the periphery, as long as the carrier is detectable.

Adult↗

The consequences of inactivating areas V1 and V5 on visual motion perception.

We studied the capacity of normal humans to discriminate the direction of motion of visual stimuli when areas V1 or V5 were reversibly inactivated with transcranial magnetic stimulation. We found that (i) magnetic stimulation of V5 at intervals of -20 to +10 ms before or after the onset of visual stimulation was effective in abolishing motion perception--other delays were not; (ii) magnetic stimulation of V1 abolished motion perception only marginally and at delays which were significantly different from those obtained with V5, the stimulation now being effective only at delays of 60-70 ms after the onset of visual stimulation. We conclude (i) that stimulation of V5 is a much more potent way of inducing akinetopsia (motion imperception) than stimulation of V1; (ii) that perceptually effective visual motion signals reach V5 at or before 30 ms and reach V1 at or before 60 ms--consequently, perceptually effective motion signals reach V5 before they reach V1; (iii) that, given the time course of arrival of signals in V1 and V5, it takes about 30-50 ms for signals from V1 to reach V5. We conclude further that there are probably two components reaching V5 from the retina, a fast one which bypasses V1 and a slow one which reaches it through V1.

Brain Mapping↗

Chromaticity, spatial complexity, and self-motion perception.

The effects of visual field color and spatial complexity on self-motion perception were investigated by placing observers inside a large rotating cylinder (optokinetic drum). Under optokinetic-drum conditions visually induced self-motion (vection) is typically perceived within 30 s, even though all forms of sensory input (eg vestibular, proprioceptive, auditory), except vision, indicate that the observer is stationary. It was hypothesized that vection would be hastened and vection magnitude increased by adding chromatic colors and spatial complexity to the lining of an optokinetic drum. Addition of these visual-field characteristics results in an array that shares more visual-field characteristics with our typical environment that usually serves as a stable frame of reference regarding self-motion perception. In the color experiment, participants viewed vertical stripes that were: (i) black and white, (ii) various gray shades, or (iii) chromatic. In the spatial complexity experiment, participants were presented with: (i) black-and-white vertical stripes, or (ii) a black-and-white checkerboard pattern. Drum rotation velocity was 5 rev. min(-1) (30 degrees s(-1)), and both vection onset and magnitude were measured for 60 s trials. Results indicate that chromaticity and spatial complexity hasten the onset of vection and increase its perceived magnitude. Chromaticity and spatial complexity are common characteristics of the environments in which our visual system evolved. The presence of these visual-field features in an optic flow pattern may be treated as an indicator that the scene being viewed is stationary and that the observer is moving.

Adult↗

Anisotropies in visual motion perception: a fresh look.

We measured motion-detection and motion-discrimination performance for different directions of motion, using stochastic motion sequences. Random-dot cinematograms containing 200 dots in a circular aperture were used as stimuli in a two-interval forced-choice procedure. In the motion-detection experiment, observers judged which of two intervals contained weak coherent motion, the other internal containing random motion only. In the direction-discrimination experiment, observers viewed a standard direction of motion followed by comparison motion in a slightly different direction. Observers indicated whether the comparison was clockwise or counterclockwise, relative to the standard. Twelve directions of motion were tested in the detection task and five standard directions (three cardinal directions and two oblique directions) in the discrimination task. Detection thresholds were invariant with direction of motion, but direction-discrimination thresholds were significantly higher for motion in oblique directions, even at low-coherence levels. Results from control conditions ruled out monitor artifacts and indicate that the oblique effect is relative to retinal coordinates. These results have broad implications for computational and physiological models of motion perception.

Anisotropy↗

Role of primary visual cortex in the binocular integration of plaid motion perception.

This study assessed the early mechanisms underlying perception of plaid motion. Thus, two superimposed gratings drifting in a rightward direction composed plaid stimuli whose global motion direction was perceived as the vector sum of the two components. The first experiment was aimed at comparing the perception of plaid motion when both components were presented to both eyes (dioptic) or separately to each eye (dichoptic). When components of the patterns had identical spatial frequencies, coherent motion was correctly perceived under dioptic and dichoptic viewing condition. However, the perceived direction deviated from the predicted direction when spatial frequency differences were introduced between components in both conditions. The results suggest that motion integration follows similar rules for dioptic and dichoptic plaids even though performance under dichoptic viewing did not reach dioptic levels. In the second experiment, the role of early cortical areas in the processing of both plaids was examined. As convergence of monocular inputs is needed for dichoptic perception, we tested the hypothesis that primary visual cortex (V1) is required for dichoptic plaid processing by delivering repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to this area. Ten minutes of magnetic stimulation disrupted subsequent dichoptic perception for approximately 15 min, whereas no significant changes were observed for dioptic plaid perception. Taken together, these findings suggest that V1 is not crucial for the processing of dioptic plaids but it is necessary for the binocular integration underlying dichoptic plaid motion perception.

Adult↗

Visually induced motion perception and visual control of postural sway in congenital nystagmus.

In congenital nystagmus (CN) the threshold for detecting motion of visual objects is increased. To determine whether this increase is due to a deterioration of visual motion signals or whether visual-vestibular interactions (which are necessary to judge object-motion in space) are also involved we examined how CN patients use visual motion signals to evaluate self-motion in perceptual and behavioral tasks. Using an optokinetic drum we measured the minimum optokinetic acceleration necessary to induced motion perception of the visual environment in CN patients. This threshold was significantly elevated in the CN patients compared with normals (20.1 deg/s2 to 3.25 deg/s2). We further addressed the question whether the elevation of this threshold is due to a deficiency in evaluating visual motion in general or to a specific modification affecting the percept of visual object-motion with respect to the inertial reference only. We thus measured the latency of visually induced self-motion perception, which was found to be very similar or even slightly smaller (1.7 +/- 0.7 s) compared with normals (2.2 +/- 1.7 s). Moreover, subjects with CN were found to use vision quite efficiently for the visual stabilization of posture (Romberg quotient 2.0 +/- 1.16), even if they did not reach the level of normals (Romberg quotient 3.7 +/- 1.1). The results indicate that CN affects the estimate of object-motion in a specific and much more severe way than the estimate of self-motion. The minimal effect of CN on self-motion perception can be explained by the low pass characteristics of the optokinetic input to self-motion perception. The specific deficiency in detecting object-motion indicates that adaptation to CN occurs on the level of visual--vestibular interactions for the perception of visual object-motion and not on the level of visual motion signals.

Adolescent↗

Biases of motion perception revealed by reversing gratings in humans who had infantile-onset strabismus.

Motion perception was tested by requiring adult subjects to view gratings that remained stationary but reversed in contrast several times per second. Subjects viewed monocularly and judged whether the gratings were stationary, or moving in one direction, in successive 3s trials. Subjects who had early-onset strabismus most frequently perceived vertically oriented gratings to be moving nasalward, and horizontally oriented gratings to be moving up or down. Normal subjects and subjects who had late-onset strabismus most frequently perceived the gratings to be stationary. The asymmetries of motion perception in early-onset strabismus imply that the visual motion neurons of cerebral cortex develop properly only if they receive normal binocular input during infancy.

Adolescent↗

Visual motion perception at the time of saccadic eye movements and its relation to spatial mislocalization.

The same retinal image motion can be produced by a variety of combinations of eye and target motion. In natural conditions, extraretinal information disambiguates retinal information for motion perception. By controlling the timing of visual motion with respect to saccades, it was possible to appraise the roles for motion perception of the signal related to saccades occurring in the vicinity of visual motion. When a visual motion was seen before or after a saccade, its perceived direction was biased in the direction opposite to the saccade. The magnitude of the bias depended on the timing of the visual motion with respect to the saccade and the meridian of the visual motion. The bias appears to be independent of the deformation of visual space reported to occur before and after saccades.

Humans↗

Reference frames for orientation anisotropies in face recognition and biological-motion perception.

Both face recognition and biological-motion perception are strongly orientation-dependent. Recognition performance decreases if the stimuli are rotated with respect to their normal upright orientation. Here, the question whether this effect operates in egocentric coordinates or in environmental coordinates is examined. In addition to the use of rotated stimuli the observers were also rotated and tested both with a same-different face-recognition task and with a biological-motion detection task. A strong orientation effect was found that depended only on the stimulus orientation relative to the observer. This result clearly indicates that orientation effects in both stimulus domains operate in an egocentric frame of reference. This finding is discussed in terms of the particular requirement of extracting sophisticated information for social recognition and communication from faces and biological motion.

Analysis of Variance↗

Psychophysical evidence of differential latencies of colour inputs to motion perception.

A novel psychophysical observation allows the determination of the relative latencies with which long, middle, and short cone signals provide input to motion perception. It is known that when two spatially displaced isoluminant stimuli in spectrally different colours are simultaneously presented, any temporal lag between the perception of the two will, due to the spatial displacement, cause the perception of apparent motion. The illusion reported here occurs through the inadvertent production of spatial displacement; peripheral observation of the boundary between two differently-coloured neighbouring areas which alternately interchange colours leads, due to transverse chromatic aberration caused by the eye's optics, to the formation of a double boundary on the retina, the serial perceptions of which create the sensation of motion. By offsetting the relative temporal phases of any two colours we have determined the relative magnitude of the latencies with which they provide input to motion perception. In all subjects motion of blue is perceived after that of red, and green is perceived after that of blue. The origins of these latencies are unclear.

Color Perception↗

Role of the superior temporal region in human visual motion perception.

While moving objects are usually seen using luminance (first-order) cues, humans can perceive the motion of objects via non-luminance (second-order) cues. Contrary to previous case reports, no physiological studies have elucidated distinct differences in the cortical regions involved in first- and second-order motion processes. We investigated brain responses related to these two types of motion perception in human subjects using 3 T functional magnetic resonance imaging and strictly controlled apparent motion stimulus pairs. Comparison of brain activation to moving versus static states of each motion stimulus isolated cortical activity related to each type of motion perception. We found a selective neural response to second-order motion stimulus in the anterior part of the superior temporal sulcus (STS) contralateral to stimulus presentation and cue-invariant activation of MT/V5+. No significant activation in the STS was observed by the first-order motion, even when its visibility was reduced to levels comparable to that of second-order motion. Furthermore, the STS demonstrated significant activation for highly visible motion stimulus with both first- and second-order attributes. The STS represents the cardinal structure for perception of second-order motions, although further studies are needed to elucidate the exact neural process occurring in this area.

Adult↗