SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Dissection”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,351 records · Page 75Linked to original sources

PubMed2001

Usefulness of indium-111-oxine-labeled leukocyte scintigraphy in diagnosis of inflammation associated with chronic aortic dissection.

BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic aortic dissection require monitoring for indications of disease progression. In present study, inflammation adjacent to associated aortic wall was evaluated by indium-111-oxine-labeled leukocyte scintigraphy, scince inflammation of the blood vessel wall often associates with progression of chronic aortic dissection. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifteen patients with aortic dissection underwent indium-111-oxine-labeled leukocyte scintigraphy. Seven showed positive images at sites corresponding to the actual sites of the dissociated aorta. Four patients with positive images underwent surgery. Histologic examination revealed inflammatory and necrotic changes of the aortic wall. During a mean follow-up period of 2.3 years, progression of aortic dissection was observed in two of the seven patients with positive intimal imaging. CONCLUSION: Indium-111-oxine-labeled leukocyte scintigraphy may be a useful noninvasive technique to assess the persistent inflammation in patients with chronic aortic dissection.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Successful near-term pregnancy outcome after repair of a dissecting thoracic aortic aneurysm at 14 weeks gestation.

PURPOSE: We report the anesthetic management for a scheduled Cesarean section of a 29-yr-old female who previously had a repair of her dissecting thoracic aortic aneurysm during the 14th week of her pregnancy. CLINICAL FEATURES: A 29-yr-old female with a history of hypertension and previously diagnosed aortic dissection secondary to suspected Marfan's syndrome, presented to our institution for the first time after she became pregnant. A transesophageal echocardiogram revealed a dissecting aortic aneurysm greater than 8 cm in diameter beginning distal to the left subclavian artery and extending into the descending thoracic aorta. The patient was counseled in great detail about the risk of rupture with continuing pregnancy. She refused termination and chose elective repair of the aneurysm, with continuation of the pregnancy. Partial repair of the thoracic aneurysm was undertaken when the pregnancy was 13(5/7) weeks by ultrasound dates. She was subsequently maintained on labetolol and hydralazine for blood pressure control. A decision was made to proceed with a Cesarean section at 32 weeks. After placement of a radial artery catheter and two large peripheral iv catheters, she received a of 7 and 7 at one and five minutes was delivered. CONCLUSIONS: Aortic dissection in pregnancy may have catastrophic results. Undoubtedly, it presents unique challenges for anesthetic and obstetrical management. With appropriate care and surgical correction of the dissecting aneurysm early in pregnancy, a successful outcome for the pregnancy was possible.

Adult↗

PubMed1998

[Two cases of surgical treatment of recrudescent Stanford type A dissection after early thrombogenic closure without intimal tear].

We reported two cases of thrombosed, Stanford A type acute aortic dissection, initially without intimal tear, later operated upon because of recrudescence. They admitted to our hospital with the symptoms of aortic dissection. Early examination of computed tomography and angiography demonstrated thrombosed type A aortic dissection showing a normal aortic figure, although accompanied by pericardial effusion, that was drainaged. Under strict BP control, however, repeat CT examination revealed recrudescent dissection of ascending aorta, making dissecting aneurysms. Graft replacement of ascending aorta was performed, on the 55th and 153th day after admission, and they were discharged.

Aged↗

PubMed2000

Organ malperfusion in acute aortic dissection.

OBJECTIVE: Organ malperfusion in aortic dissection can precipitate a serious condition. The strategy of treatment for it has been controversial. We have focused on the strategy and outcome of acute aortic dissection with organ malperfusion. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Between January 1995 and December 1998, 134 acute aortic dissection patients were admitted. There were 73 males (65.4 +/- 8.0 years old) and 61 females (66.7 +/- 7.4 years old). There were 83 patients of Stanford type A, and 51 patients of type B. Of them, 24 patients (17.9%) were complicated by organ malperfusion. The brain was affected in 4, the heart in 5, the spinal cord in 2, the liver in 1, the intestine in 1, the kidney in 4, and the lower extremities in 10 patients. Our management strategy for a patient with malperfusion in acute aortic dissection was that the antecedent operation was initially mandatory, and central grafting was secondarily considered. RESULTS: Refusal of operation or lethal conditions excluded 8 of the 24 patients from operation. An antecedent operation was mandatory in eight of the remaining 16 patients. The overall mortality was 33.3% (8/24 patients), and operative mortality was 31.3% (5/16 patients) in the patients with malperfusion. The overall mortality was 11.8% (13/110 patients), and the operative mortality was 11.1% (9/81 patients) in the patients without malperfusion. CONCLUSION: Organ malperfusion is a major component in the management and treatment of acute aortic dissection. Only an appropriate strategy and therapy could result in a satisfactory outcome.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed2002

Interventional management of aortic dissection.

BACKGROUND: Modern high-resolution imaging techniques have provided new insights into the pathogenesis of aortic dissection during recent years. Distinct pathologic entities or potential precursors of classic false-lumen aortic dissection such as intramural hematoma or penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer have been identified. As a result, a novel classification according to Svensson used in addition to the standard differentiation according to DeBakey or Stanford has been introduced. Due to improved diagnostic imaging, preoperative mortality has decreased but mortality remains substantial (up to 1.4% per hour within the first 2 days) related to complications of aortic dissection such as aortic rupture, bleeding, pericardial tamponade, critical branch vessel ischemia, multiorgan failure, and myocardial infarction. EXAMINATIONS: Transesophageal echocardiography, angiography, magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography as well as intravascular ultrasound are used for a complete vascular "staging" of patients with aortic dissection after initial stabilization (with or without surgery). New catheter-based interventional techniques have been developed to improve the poor prognosis of aortic dissection: 1 Percutaneous balloon fenestration (PTF) of the intimal flap improves perfusion in case of bowel, limb, or renal ischemia. 2. Aortic stent-graft placement allows for occlusion of the intimal entry tear by implantation of a membrane-covered, self-expanding stent-graft to initiate progressive thrombus formation within the false lumen. Compared to the traditional surgical approaches, both techniques have a low complication rate. The development of these techniques may help to further improve to decrease patients' morbidity and mortality.

Aortic Dissection↗

PubMed2000

[Acute aortic dissection. Diagnosis and therapy of ischemic complications].

AIM OF THE STUDY: About 30% of the patients with acute aortic dissection suffer from organ or limb ischemia. We analyzed the influence of ischemic localization and method of operative treatment (aortic fenestration or extraanatomic bypass revascularization) on morbidity and mortality. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1 May 1987 to 31 December 1998 21 patients with 24 vascular complications such as renal or intestinal ischemia, lower extremity ischemia and paraplegia following acute aortic dissection were treated at our institution. Recruitment was retrospective in 16 and prospective in 5 patients. In 5 patients (24%) the complication was associated with Stanford A, in 16 (76%) with Stanford B dissection. Ten patients (48%) complained of malperfusion of only one region, whereas 11 patients (52%) suffered from ischemia of two or three different regions. Aortic fenestration and resection of the dissected membrane was performed in nine cases (37%). Fifteen patients (63%) were treated with extraanatomic bypass techniques. RESULTS: One third of the patients died, four of them due to aortic penetration or perforation and two due to visceral ischemia. During follow-up of 32 (1-110) months two patients developed aortic complications. One died of aortic perforation, while the other developed a thoracoabdominal aneurysm and had to be treated by a tube graft replacement. CONCLUSIONS: Outcome depended more on the spontaneous course of aortic dissection and on prompt diagnosis and therapy of the complications than on the different operative techniques.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

[Modern diagnostic concepts in dissection and aortic occlusion].

For the diagnostic work-up of the aorta, non-invasive cross-sectional imaging techniques have almost replaced invasive catheter angiography. CT- and MR-angiography are supplemented by sonography which is used predominantly for the assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysm and dissections of the thoracic aorta. This review deals with the diagnostic approach to two disease entities involving the aorta: aortic dissection and aortic occlusion. Transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE), CT- and MR-angiography (MRA) are used in the assessment of aortic dissection. Published sensitivity and specificity values regarding the detection and classification of dissections into Stanford A and Stanford B range between 96-100% for all three modalities. Results for multislice CTA have not yet been reported, but can be expected to be at least as good. The ability to delineate additional information regarding the precise morphology of true and false lumen, entry and reentry-sites, the development of thrombus or paraaortic hematomas, as well as the assessment of aortic regurgitation or involvement of coronary arteries depend on the chosen technique. Reflecting the ability to collect functional imaging data, both TEE and MRA are superior to CTA in the assessment of aortic valve involvement, while TEE is the modality of choice for evaluation of coronary arteries. Sonography is of limited use in the assessment of abdominal dissections. For the evaluation of patients with suspected aortic occlusion both CTA and MRA represent the imaging modalities of choice. Both provide for a comprehensive and precise depiction of the underlying aortic morphology, the extent of collateral flow as well as delineation of distal run-off vessels. MRA should be employed in patients with impaired renal function as paramagnetic contrast agents are not nephrotoxic.

Aged↗

PubMed2003

Treatment of a spontaneous intracranial dissecting aneurysm with stent-assisted coil embolization.

Arterial dissection is now recognized as an important cause of stroke. Most reported dissections involve the extracranial portion of the internal carotid artery (ICA) and vertebral arteries. Spontaneous dissecting aneurysms of the intracranial ICA are uncommon. Endovascular treatment for cerebral aneurysms has become widespread; however, the dissecting aneurysm is still difficult to treat if the parent artery has to be preserved. More recently, stenting has been advocated for use with endosaccular coiling, with the coils held in place by the stent. We herein report a spontaneous intracranial ICA dissecting aneurysm in a 51-year-old woman who was treated using a new technique of combined stent and coils.

Aortic Dissection↗

PubMed2000

Coil embolisation for ruptured vertebral artery dissection distal to the origin of the posterior inferior cerebellar artery.

Although many surgical or endovascular treatments for ruptured vertebral artery dissection have been reported, the best treatment is controversial. We treated five cases of ruptured vertebral artery dissection distal to the origin of the posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA), using retrievable platinum coils packed in the dissection site and the immediately proximal vertebral artery. All patients had a contralateral vertebral artery of the same calibre or larger. All dissections were occluded completely, together with the portion of the vertebral artery distal to the PICA origin. No complications related to the procedure were seen. The purpose of the treatment is to isolate the dissection from the cerebral circulation. Occlusion of the rupture site, preserving perforating arteries arising from the vertebral artery, would be ideal. Short-segment occlusion by retrievable platinum coils is close to the ideal.

Aged↗

PubMed2001

Determinants of early and late outcome after surgery for type A aortic dissection.

The aim of this study was to identify the most important variables associated with early and late mortality in patients operated on for type A aortic dissection over a 15-year period. From January 1984 to March 1999, 110 patients underwent surgery for type A aortic dissection. The 88.1% of patients had an acute type A dissection (AD) and 11.8% had a chronic dissection (CD). Cardiac tamponade and shock occurred in 21.8% and 14.5% of the patients, respectively. The location of the primary intimal tear was in the ascending aorta in 70.9% of cases, in the arch in 17.2%, and in the descending aorta in 7.2%. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify non-embolic variables independently correlated to in-hospital death. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses and hazard function for death risk were used to analyze factors influencing overall and surgical survival. The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 20.9% (23/110 patients), being 9% for CD and 21.6% for AD. Emergent procedures had an in-hospital mortality rate of 47.6%, whereas nonemergent operations had an in-hospital mortality rate of 13.7% (p < 0.01). Univariate analysis revealed 41 preoperative and operative variables, including age (years), age >70 years, remote myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular dysfunction, diabetes, preoperative renal failure, shock, cardiopulmonary bypass time (minutes), emergency operation, as factors associated to in-hospital death (p < 0.05). Stepwise logistic regression analysis for in-hospital death selected as independent predicting variables (p < 0.05) remote myocardial infarction [p = 0.006, odds ratio (OR) = 1.9], preoperative renal failure (p = 0.031; OR = 0.8), shock (p = 0.001; OR = 3.1), and age >70 years (p = 0.007; OR = 1.7). Follow-up ranged from 9 to 172 months (median 78 months), with Kaplan-Meier survivals for all the patients and hospital survivors of 42% and 54% at 10 years, respectively. Cox regression analysis has identified postoperative stroke [relative risk (RR) = 3.7; p = 0.012), intimal tear in the aortic arch (RR = 2.3; p = 0.036), and postoperative renal failure (RR = 4.5; p = 0.007) as independent predictors of reduced survival at follow-up. When this kind of analysis was performed on hospital survivors only, preoperative renal dysfunction (RR = 1; p = 0.013), reoperation (RR = 1.7;p = 0.004) and intimal tear in the aortic arch (RR = 1.2; p = 0.002) emerged as risk factors. The actuarial freedom from reoperation was 85.4% at 5 years. Multiple factors still influence early and late survival after surgery for type A aortic dissection. Preoperative renal impairment both affects early and late outcome. Early postoperative course affects late outcome in hospital survivors. The presence of the intimal tear in the aortic arch has a negative impact on late survival.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Comparison of medial-to-lateral versus traditional lateral-to-medial laparoscopic dissection sequences for resection of rectosigmoid cancers: randomized controlled clinical trial.

This study aimed to compare medial-to-lateral versus lateral-to-medial laparoscopic dissection sequences for resecting rectosigmoid cancers. We hypothesized that the medial-to-lateral approach was a more efficient procedure and with potentially better oncologic results. Between January 1997 and June 1999, a total of 67 patients of rectosigmoid cancer treated by one surgeon using the laparoscopic approach were recruited for this prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Using the blocked randomization method, 36 patients were allocated to a medial-to-lateral (M) group and the other 31 to a lateral-to-medial (L) group; the groups were well matched in age, gender, symptoms, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) class, tumor location, tumor distance above the anal verge, tumor gross morphology, TNM stage of the tumor, and accuracy of preoperative TNM staging (p > 0.05). All patients were followed up until June 2001. We found that the M group had a significantly shorter operating time and lower overall costs than the L group (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between these two groups in terms of intraoperative complications, conversion rate, postoperative ileus, hospitalization, postoperative pain, postoperative complications, wound length, or disability (p > 0.05). The postoperative proinflammatory response, evaluated by the C-reactive protein level and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate, was significantly lower in the M group (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between these two groups regarding postoperative immunosuppression, as evaluated by the alterations of total lymphocyte counts and the CD4(+)/CD8(+) ratio (p > 0.05). The extent of dissection of these two dissection approaches was similar, as the harvested lymph nodes were equivalent (p > 0.05). During the whole follow-up period (median 32 months, range 24-54 months), the tumor recurrence rate was similar for these two groups of patients (5.6% in the M group vs. 6.5% in the L group; p > 0.05). These findings indicated that the medial-to-lateral approach was quicker, less expensive and possibly less invasive; moreover, it gave oncologic results similar to those achieved with the traditional lateral-to-medial dissection sequence. We thus concluded that the medial-to-lateral dissection sequence may currently be the most appropriate procedure for laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid cancers.

Aged↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Spontaneous dissection of the superior mesenteric artery.

Spontaneous dissection of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) is a rare occurrence, especially when not associated with aortic dissection [1]. Currently, only 28 cases appear to have been reported. Due to the scarcity of cases in the literature, the natural history of isolated, spontaneous SMA dissection is unclear. CT has been reported to be useful for the initial diagnosis of SMA dissection [2-5]. We present two recent cases of spontaneous SMA dissection in which enhanced spiral CT was instrumental in following the disease process and guiding clinical decision making.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Bare stent implantation in iatrogenic dissecting pseudoaneurysm of the superior mesenteric artery.

Iatrogenic arterial dissection leading to the development of dissecting pseudoaneurysms of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) is a rare complication of angiography. Surgical and endovascular treatment options exist for this important condition. We report a case of bare stent implantation in dissecting pseudoaneurysm of the SMA that developed after angiography in a patient with acute mesenteric ischemia. Although it is rarely published, iatrogenic arterial dissection causing pseudoaneurysm can occur after diagnostic and interventional angiography. Bare stent implantation in dissecting pseudoaneurysm of the SMA could be an advantageous endovascular treatment option in selected cases due its to potential preservation of important side branches of the SMA.

Abdominal Pain↗

PubMed2004

Imaging of aortic dissection by helical computed tomography (CT).

Aortic dissection is the most frequent cause of aortic emergency, and its outcome is still frequently fatal. The management of this pathology has changed with the development of endovascular means. Nowadays, imaging modalities are helpful in management decision-making by providing information such as identification of entry tears along the aorta and involvement of the visceral branches of the abdominal aorta. Multi-slice CT scanning now appears to be the modality of choice for complete examination of the entire aorta. We review the parameters of image acquisition and contrast injection; appearances on CT of acute and chronic dissection are illustrated. Diagnostic pitfalls in CT imaging of acute dissection are discussed. Imaging of the post-surgical aorta and of chronic dissection is outlined. Intra-mural hematoma and penetrating aortic ulcer are subtypes of aortic dissection, and their appearances on CT scanning are also presented.

Aortic Dissection↗

PubMed1998

Dissection of the infrarenal aorta treated by stent graft placement.

Aortic dissection is primarily localized in the thoracic aorta. Dissection of the abdominal aorta is exceedingly rare, especially in the absence of a blunt abdominal trauma. Two cases of a primarily infrarenal aortic dissection were diagnosed by US, CT and angiography. The patients were treated by stent graft placement. The stent grafts were introduced via a femoral arteriotomy through the introducer sheath and were placed so that they occluded entry and reentry of aortic dissection. The stent graft placement caused total obliteration of a false channel of the dissection immediately after endoprosthesis deployment. The patients were followed-up by CT and angiography at 16 and 3 months after surgery without complication.

Aged↗

PubMed1998

[Lysis therapy in aortic dissection: by hypertrophic cardiomyopathy simulated myocardial infarct].

A 52-year-old patient presenting with severe thoracic pain of more than 30 minutes duration and ST-segment elevation > 1 mV in leads V1-3 was given 100 mg rt-PA. With persisting thoracic pain and ST-segment elevation, coronary angiography was performed 90 minutes after administration of thrombolytic therapy. Surprisingly, angiography revealed normal coronary arteries in presence of marked hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. New onset of thoracic pain after four hours led to a chest radiograph demonstrating increased mediastinal widening and new pleural effusion as compared to a baseline chest film prior to rt-PA. Spiral computed tomography revealed overt Type B aortic dissection with an intimal flap and communication distal to the origin of the left subclavian artery with signs of a mediastinal hematoma. Immediate cardiac surgery with replacement of the dissected aortic segment was successfully performed. A literature review revealed 4% of aortic dissection to present with electrocardiographic signs of acute myocardial infarction and 13% to have concomitant coronary artery disease; moreover 34 cases of aortic dissection were misdiagnosed as infarction and subjected to thrombolytic agents with a mortality of 64% underlining the importance of exclusion of dissection prior to thrombolytic therapy.

Aortic Dissection↗

PubMed2001

[Clinical diagnosis of acute aortic dissection].

Despite the availability of modern imaging technology, 35% of aortic dissections remain undiagnosed in vivo because clinical criteria for aortic dissection are not available to date. The present study analyzed 250 patients with acute chest and/or back pain, absence of an established differential diagnosis of the pain syndrome and clinical suspicion of acute aortic dissection for presence of 26 clinical variables. Multivariate analysis identified an aortic pain syndrome with immediate onset and/or tearing or ripping character (P < 0.0001), mediastinal and/or aortic widening on chest radiography (P < 0.0002) and pulse- and/or blood pressure differentials (P < 0.0001) as predictors of acute aortic dissection. Probability of dissection was low (7%) with absence of all three variables, intermediate (31 and 39%, respectively) with isolated findings of "aortic pain" or "mediastinal widening", and high (> 83%) with either isolated "pulse- and/or blood pressure differentials" or any combination of the three variables. This model appears useful to improve selection of patients for emergency imaging of the thoracic aorta.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed2004

Hoarseness as an unusual initial presentation of aortic dissection.

Aortic dissection is a life-threatening medical emergency. While an abrupt, tearing pain in the chest or back is present in more than 90% of the patients, diagnosis of aortic dissection has been shown to be particularly difficult when such symptoms are not present. In this report we describe a 36-year-old man presenting with a 10-day history of new onset of hoarseness associated with several transient headache episodes. The possibility of aortic dissection was overlooked at the initial presentation, and unilateral vocal cord palsy due to a cerebrovascular accident was the initial diagnosis. The patient's abnormal chest radiograph led to a re-diagnosis, and a Standford type-B aortic dissection was confirmed using thoracic computed tomography. The unusual presentation of aortic dissection is emphasized, and its management is discussed.

Adult↗