PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “ANESTHESIA, SPINAL”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 145 records · Page 8Linked to original sources

Sympathetic block during spinal anesthesia in volunteers using lidocaine, tetracaine, and bupivacaine.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Spinal anesthesia to high thoracic dermatomes is alleged to result in almost complete block of all sympathetic efferent nerves. To examine the degree of sympathectomy during spinal anesthesia, the sympathetic response to a cold pressor test (CPT) applied to unblocked dermatomes before and during spinal anesthesia was measured with use of three different local anesthetics. METHODS: Twelve healthy volunteers were studied in a randomized and double-blind fashion on three separate occasions. In random order, each volunteer received approximately equipotent spinal doses of tetracaine 15 mg, bupivacaine 15 mg, and lidocaine 100 mg in hyperbaric solutions. Prior to and 30 minutes after spinal injection of local anesthetic, a CPT was applied for 2 minutes, and changes from baseline resting conditions in five physiologic variables were measured. RESULTS: The CPT 1 given before anesthetic administration resulted in an increase in heart rate, mean arterial pressure, cardiac index, and plasma concentrations of norepinephrine and epinephrine. Spinal anesthesia to a median level of T3 resulted in a decrease in mean arterial pressure by 10-12% but did not significantly decrease the other variables. Spinal anesthesia did not change the increase in heart rate or cardiac index in response to the second CPT, but the increase in mean arterial pressure was attenuated compared to the CPT before anesthesia. No increase in norepinephrine or epinephrine concentration was observed during the CPT given during spinal anesthesia. There was no significant relationship between level of analgesia and sympathetic response to stress. CONCLUSIONS: Spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric solutions of tetracaine 15 mg, bupivacaine 15 mg, and lidocaine 100 mg attenuated sympathetic function but did not produce complete sympathectomy. The effects were independent of the local anesthetic used.

Adult↗

[Extent and duration of isobaric 0.5% bupivacaine spinal anesthesia by using new open-end pencil point spinal needle].

Extent and duration of isobaric 0.5% bupivacaine spinal anesthesia by using two spinal needles; a new 25 gauge open-end pencil point spinal needle (needle tip is open as a hole after pulling out the stylet, Doctor Japan Co., Japan) and a 25 gauge Quincke needle (TOP Co., Japan) were studied clinically in 24 patients for elective lower extremity surgery. Patients were randomly assigned into two groups of 12 patients each according to the spinal needle used. Lumbar puncture was performed between L3-4 with the patient in lateral decubitus position. After isobaric 0.5% bupivacaine 4.0 ml was injected in 20 seconds, the patient was placed in supine position, and the onset of anesthesia was assessed by loss of cold sensation (alcohol sponge), sensory block (pinprick) and motor block (modified Bromage's scale) in every 5 minutes until 30 minutes. Recovery of motor block and adverse effects were assessed by a blinded observer. Sensory block at 30 minutes by Quincke needle was Th 8.4 +/- 1.0 and by new open-end pencil point needle it was Th 8.5 +/- 3.2 dermatomes. Two groups did not differ significantly in sensory block and also in motor block. No adverse effect was observed in both groups. These results indicate that this new open-end pencil point spinal needle is very useful for preventing adverse effects of spinal anesthesia.

Adult↗

Power spectral heart rate analysis demonstrates decreased activity of the sympathetic nervous system during low bupivacaine spinal anesthesia.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the onset of spinal anesthesia with power spectral heart rate analysis to determine the influence of the block on the autonomic nervous system. DESIGN: Prospective, clinical evaluation. SETTING: Tertiary-care teaching hospital. PATIENTS: 27 ASA physical status I and II patients scheduled for lower extremity orthopedic surgery and free of major cardiac disease or cardiac drugs with direct influence of heart rate (HR) or blood pressure (BP). INTERVENTIONS: Prior to anesthesia, a baseline power spectral heart rate reading was taken in the supine position. Spinal anesthesia was established in the sitting position with 15 mg of bupivacaine and 0.2 mg epinephrine introduced at the L3-L4 interspace with a 22-gauge Quincke needle. The patient was returned supine, and power spectral heart rate data were again collected at 5-minute intervals throughout the procedure. Level of the spinal block was checked at 5-minute intervals until 30 minutes and considered complete when two consecutive readings were unchanged. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Heart rate and BP were recorded at baseline and at five-minute intervals after injection. Power spectral heart rate data included low-frequency activity (LFa), high-frequency activity (HFa), and the ratio (LFa/HFa). Spinal level achieved was recorded by thoracic dermatome at complete onset. Heart rate and BP remained within 20% of control in all cases. Complete onset of the spinal block was present by 30 minutes in all cases. The average level of spinal anesthesia was T8. Compared with baseline, LFa activity decreased, HFa activity remained unchanged, and the ratio was decreased. During endoprosthesis insertion, 9 of 14 total hip patients had a transient ten-fold increase in LFa activity, without HFa change, and a corresponding increase in the ratio. CONCLUSIONS: Power spectral heart rate analysis during low thoracic bupivacaine spinal anesthesia is compatible with decreased sympathetic activity during stable hemodynamic intervals. Insertion of hip endoprosthesis resulted in a dramatic, transient increase in sympathetic activity, indicating that sympathetic activation was still possible despite the presence of surgical anesthesia from the subarachnoid block.

Anesthesia, Spinal↗