PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Consensus Statement”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 145 records · Page 8Linked to original sources
PubMed2026

Wearable wrist-watch type cuff oscillometric blood pressure monitors: consensus statement by the European Society of Hypertension Working Group on blood pressure monitoring.

Wearable wristwatch-type cuff oscillometric blood pressure (BP) monitors represent a new category of BP devices and are the first wearable monitors to use established cuff-oscillometric BP measurement technology. This consensus statement by the European Society of Hypertension Working Group on BP Monitoring reviews the published evidence on their design, accuracy, validation, clinical application, and remaining research questions. Of 281 articles identified through a systematic PubMed search, 26 were relevant. Several devices are currently available; however, only two have published validation studies performed according to established standards (Omron HeartGuide and Huawei Watch D/D2). Static validation studies generally showed acceptable accuracy, whereas data on 24-h ambulatory use, in special populations, and clinical applications remain limited. Potential advantages include self-initiated measurement at home, at work, and in other settings and conditions; more convenient and repeatable 24-h ambulatory monitoring; more convenient and accurate assessment of asleep BP; capture of stress-related and other BP-related episodes. However, proper wrist position, user adherence, ambulatory performance, and clinical applications require further investigation. More research is needed to establish the accuracy and clinical utility of these novel devices and their role in improving the diagnosis and management of hypertension.

Humans↗
PubMed1996

Psychiatry of the elderly. Consensus statement: WHO and the Geriatric Psychiatry Section of the World Psychiatric Association.

J. Wertheimer, Professor for psychogeriatrics at the University of Lausanne and Chairman, Geriatric Psychiatry Section, World Psychiatric Association (WPA) and Dr. J. A. Costa e Silva, Director, Division of Mental Health and Prevention of Substance Abuse (WHO) organized a Consensus Meeting which took place in Lausanne from 05.-07.02.1996. The meeting aimed at the elaboration of recommendations on psychogeriatrics. The meeting was attended by the above mentioned WHO and WPA representatives and also by representatives from the following organisations: International Psychogeriatric Association, International Association of Gerontology, International Union of Psychological Science, Alzheimer's Disease International, International Council of Nurses, International Federation of Social Workers, International Federation of Ageing, World Federation of Occupational Therapists. Further attendants were various experts who participated at the meeting on invitation of Prof. Wertheimer and Dr. Costa e Silva. The discussion was chaired by Prof. H. Häfner (Mannheim). Dr. N. Graham (London) and Prof. C. Katona (Harlow/Essex) acted as co-rapporteurs. The Consensus Statement was unamnimously accepted by all participants. It contains recommendations for the development within a field of great future importance with regard to the current and expected global demographic structure and the increasing knowledge about agespecific diseases and general health, social and personal problems of the elderly.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

Orbital vascular malformations: a consensus statement on terminology and its clinical implications. Orbital Society.

PURPOSE: Orbital venous anomalies and lymphangiomas have been generally classified on morphologic grounds. However, conflicting concepts of these lesions have hampered scientific dialogue and confused clinicians, with occasionally serious consequences for patients. As a step toward uniform nomenclature and better communication, a consensus on the terminology of orbital vascular malformations was sought among the members of the Orbital Society. METHODS: A classification of orbital vascular malformations based on their hemodynamic relationships, as revealed by clinical and imaging features, was presented, discussed, and adopted at the 1998 Annual Meeting of the Orbital Society. A consensus statement was drafted and distributed to all members. The statement was then modified in accordance with members' responses, which included minor stylistic recommendations but no substantive dissent. RESULTS: Orbital vascular malformations may be classified according to their hemodynamic relationships as no flow, venous flow, and arterial flow lesions. Assignment to each group is based on pertinent clinical and imaging criteria. Mixed forms with both venous and no flow components are grouped within the venous flow category to emphasize the clinical importance of that relationship. CONCLUSIONS: A hemodynamic classification of orbital vascular malformations emphasizes features most germane to their management. It should reduce the clinical confusion resulting from purely morphologic differentiation. Widely accepted definitions may allow a better comparison of therapeutic protocols for these troublesome lesions.

Arteries↗
PubMed2002

A consensus statement on health care transitions for young adults with special health care needs.

This policy statement represents a consensus on the critical first steps that the medical profession needs to take to realize the vision of a family-centered, continuous, comprehensive, coordinated, compassionate, and culturally competent health care system that is as developmentally appropriate as it is technically sophisticated. The goal of transition in health care for young adults with special health care needs is to maximize lifelong functioning and potential through the provision of high-quality, developmentally appropriate health care services that continue uninterrupted as the individual moves from adolescence to adulthood. This consensus document has now been approved as policy by the boards of the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Academy of Family Physicians, and the American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

[Viral hepatitis: Croatian consensus statement].

There has been a dramatic improvement in diagnostic procedures and therapy of viral hepatitis in the last 20 years. Improvements in therapy caused an increase in actual cost, however, with significant long-term savings through a decreased cost of treatment of advanced liver disease including liver transplantation. The Croatian National Board for Viral Hepatitis has decided to initiate the organization of consensus conference on viral hepatitis enabling the leading experts in the country to give the best possible recommendations for the diagnosis, prophylaxis and therapy in our circumstances. The Consensus Conference took place in Zagreb in June 2004, with update in March 2005, organized by the Croatian National Board for Viral Hepatitis, Reference Centers of the Ministry of Health for Chronic Liver Diseases, Infectious Diseases and AIDS, Croatian Society of Gastroenterology--Hepatology Section, Croatian Society for Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation, and Croatian Institute for Health Insurance. Invited experts provided written reports on the respective subjects that appear in this issue and their recommendations resulting in this consensus statement.

Consensus Statements as Topic↗
PubMed2003

Guidelines for implantable cardioverter defibrillator follow-up in Canada: a consensus statement of the Canadian Working Group on Cardiac Pacing.

A survey on the follow-up practices of patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) in Canada was conducted by the Canadian Working Group on Cardiac Pacing in 1999. The survey identified the need for national guidelines. The present guidelines for ICD follow-up represent a consensus statement of the Canadian Working Group on Cardiac Pacing. They recommend that patients be assessed before hospital discharge, at two to 12 weeks following implantation, six months after implantation, and at a minimum of every six months thereafter. More frequent assessments may be required for some patients depending on associated cardiovascular problems and specific ICD devices. A typical follow-up visit should include a targeted cardiovascular assessment, interrogation of the ICD, review of telemetered data, assessment of the underlying rhythm, pacing and sensing thresholds, lead impedance and appropriate reprogramming of ICD parameters to optimize device function and longevity.

Cardiac Pacing, Artificial↗
PubMed1989

Do practice guidelines guide practice? The effect of a consensus statement on the practice of physicians.

Guidelines for medical practice can contribute to improved care only if they succeed in moving actual practice closer to the behaviors the guidelines recommend. To assess the effect of such guidelines, we surveyed hospitals and obstetricians in Ontario before and after the release of a widely distributed and nationally endorsed consensus statement recommending decreases in the use of cesarean sections. These surveys, along with discharge data from hospitals reflecting actual practice, revealed that most obstetricians (87 to 94 percent) were aware of the guidelines and that most (82.5 to 85 percent) agreed with them. Attitudes toward the use of cesarean section were congruent with the recommendations even before their release. One third of the hospitals and obstetricians reported changing their practice as a consequence of the guidelines, and obstetricians reported rates of cesarean section in women with a previous cesarean section that were significantly reduced, in keeping with the recommendations (from 72.2 percent to 61.1 percent; P less than 0.01). The surveys also showed, however, that knowledge of the content of the recommendations was poor (67 percent correct responses). Furthermore, data on actual practice after the publication of the guidelines showed that the rates of cesarean section were 15 to 49 percent higher than the rates reported by obstetricians, and they showed only a slight change from the previous upward trend. We conclude that guidelines for practice may predispose physicians to consider changing their behavior, but that unless there are other incentives or the removal of disincentives, guidelines may be unlikely to effect rapid change in actual practice. We believe that incentives should operate at the local level, although they may include system-wide economic changes.

Cesarean Section↗
PubMed2000

Investigation of chronic venous insufficiency: A consensus statement (France, March 5-9, 1997).

This consensus document provides an up-to-date account of the various methods available for the investigation of chronic venous insufficiency of the lower limbs (CVI), with an outline of their history, usefulness, and limitations. CVI is characterized by symptoms or signs produced by venous hypertension as a result of structural or functional abnormalities of veins. The most frequent causes of CVI are primary abnormalities of the venous wall and the valves and secondary changes due to previous venous thrombosis that can lead to reflux, obstruction, or both. Because the history and clinical examination will not always indicate the nature and extent of the underlying abnormality (anatomic extent, pathology, and cause), a number of diagnostic investigations have been developed that can elucidate whether there is calf muscle pump dysfunction and determine the anatomic extent and severity of obstruction or reflux. The difficulty in deciding which investigations to use and how to interpret the results has stimulated the development of this consensus document. The aim of this document was to provide an account of these tests, with an outline of their usefulness and limitations and indications of which patients should be subjected to the tests and when and of what clinical decisions can be made. This document was written primarily for the clinician who would like to learn the latest approaches to the investigation of patients with CVI and the new applications that have emerged from recent research, as well as for the novice who is embarking on venous research. Care has been taken to indicate which methods have entered the clinical arena and which are mainly used for research. The foundation for this consensus document was laid by the faculty at a meeting held under the auspices of the American Venous Forum, the Cardiovascular Disease Educational and Research Trust, the European Society of Vascular Surgery, the International Angiology Scientific Activity Congress Organization, the International Union of Angiology, and the Union Internationale de Phlebologie at the Abbaye des Vaux de Cernay, France, on March 5 to 9, 1997. Subsequent input by co-opted faculty members and revisions in 1998 and 1999 have ensured a document that provides an up-to-date account of the various methods available for the investigation of CVI.

Chronic Disease↗
PubMed2001

Management of spontaneous pneumothorax: an American College of Chest Physicians Delphi consensus statement.

OBJECTIVE: Provide explicit expert-based consensus recommendations for the management of adults with primary and secondary spontaneous pneumothoraces in an emergency department and inpatient hospital setting. The use of opinion was made explicit by employing a structured questionnaire, appropriateness scores, and consensus scores with a Delphi technique. The guideline was designed to be relevant to physicians who make management decisions for the care of patients with pneumothorax. OPTIONS: Decisions for observation, chest tube placement, surgical interventions, and radiographic imaging. OUTCOMES: Effectiveness of pneumothorax resolution, duration of and patient tolerance of care, and pneumothorax recurrence. EVIDENCE: Literature review from 1967 to January 1999 and Delphi questionnaire submitted in three iterations to a multidisciplinary physician panel. VALUES: The guideline development group determined by consensus the relevant outcomes to be considered in developing the Delphi questionnaire. BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS: The type and magnitude of benefits, harms, and costs expected for patients from guideline implementation. RECOMMENDATIONS: Management decisions vary between patients with primary or secondary pneumothoraces, with observation of small pneumothoraces being appropriate only for primary pneumothoraces. The level of consensus varies regarding the specific interventions indicated, but agreement exists for the general principles of care. VALIDATION: Recommendations were peer reviewed by physician experts and were reviewed by the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) Health and Science Policy Committee. IMPLEMENTATION: The guideline recommendations will be published in printed and electronic form with distribution of synopses for patients and health care providers. Contents of the guideline will be incorporated into continuing medical education programs. SPONSORS: The ACCP.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Consensus statement of the Society of Critical Care Medicine's Ethics Committee regarding futile and other possibly inadvisable treatments.

OBJECTIVES: Society must always face the reality of limited medical resources and must find mechanisms for distributing these resources fairly and efficiently. One recent approach for distributing limited medical resources has been the development of policies that limit the availability of futile treatments. The objectives of this consensus statement are as follows: a) to define futility and thereby enable a clear discussion of the issues; and b) to identify principles and procedures for resolving cases in which life-sustaining treatment may be futile or inadvisable. DATA SOURCES: A literature review, synthesis, and committee discussion. CONCLUSIONS: Treatments should be defined as futile only when they will not accomplish their intended goal. Treatments that are extremely unlikely to be beneficial, are extremely costly, or are of uncertain benefit may be considered inappropriate and hence inadvisable, but should not be labeled futile. Futile treatments constitute a small fraction of medical care. Thus, employing the concept of futile care in decision-making will not primarily contribute to a reduction in resource use. Nonetheless, communities have a legitimate interest in allocating medical resources by limiting inadvisable treatments. Communities should seek to do so using a rationale that is explicit, equitable, and democratic; that does not disadvantage the disabled, poor, or uninsured; and that recognizes the diversity of individual values and goals. Policies to limit inadvisable treatment should have the following characteristics: a) be disclosed in the public record; b) reflect moral values acceptable to the community; c) not be based exclusively on prognostic scoring systems; d) articulate appellate mechanisms; and e) be recognized by the courts. Healthcare organizations that control payment have a profound influence on treatment decisions and should formally address criteria for determining when treatments are inadvisable and should share accountability for those decisions.

Critical Care↗
PubMed2004

Consensus statements, positions, standards, and guidelines for pain and care at the end of life.

Standards, guidelines, and position and consensus statements by themselves do not change practice or improve pain management and care at the end of life. However, if they are used effectively, they support best practices, provide a forum for discussion of current recommendations, and provide nurses with the latest science and information to advocate for effective pain and symptom management.

Clinical Protocols↗