PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “RADIOTHERAPY DOSAGE”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 163 records · Page 9Linked to original sources
PubMed2003

[Male gonadal dose in adjuvant 3-d-pelvic irradiation after anterior resection of rectal cancer. Influence to fertility].

BACKGROUND: Rectal cancer is a common malignant disease and occurs not infrequently in younger men. We verified the dose to the testes from scattered radiation in adjuvant pelvic irradiation following anterior resection of rectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHOD: We measured the scattered gonadal dose of 18 patients in vivo with thermoluminescence detectors, which were fixed on four defined points on the scrotum during radiation on three consecutive days. All patients were treated three-dimensionally planned using a three-field box lying in prone position in a bellyboard. A total dose of 50.4 Gy was given in 28 fractions of 1.8 Gy. From 45 up to 50.4 Gy the radiation fields were modified to lateral-opposing fields which were shortened from the top to protect the small bowel. RESULTS: The mean gonadal dose per fraction of all patients was 0.057 Gy (median 0.05 Gy) with a range between 0.035 and 0.114 Gy. The standard deviation was 0.02 Gy. The calculated cumulative mean gonadal dose after 28 fractions was 1.60 Gy (0.98-3.19 Gy). CONCLUSIONS: Germinal epithelium is very sensitive to low-dose irradiation, according to a negative fractionation effect. It is known that gonadal total doses of 1 Gy with single doses of 0.03-0.05 Gy can result in a temporary azoospermia with following recovery in most cases. If gonadal total doses exceed 1.5 Gy a substantial increase in irreversible azoospermia must be expected. With respect to the data reported in the literature our measured mean gonadal total dose of 1.60 Gy will lead with high probability to an irreversible infertility. Because of the small number of patients in our study, the data must be interpreted with caution, however, it is very important in patient's informed consent to draw attention to the high risk of infertility. The possibility of sperm cryoconservation should be discussed with the patient.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

High-dose-rate (HDR) or pulsed-dose-rate (PDR) perioperative interstitial intensity-modulated brachytherapy (IMBT) for local recurrences of previously irradiated breast or thoracic wall following breast cancer.

PURPOSE: In patients receiving salvage high-dose-rate (HDR) or pulsed-dose-rate (PDR) brachytherapy for a local recurrence on the chest wall or in the previously treated breast, clinical outcome and benefit were investigated. All patients had previously been treated with full-dose adjuvant external-beam irradiation (EBRT). Disease-free interval after salvage treatment, local tumor control and side effects were analyzed retrospectively. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1996 and 2002, a total of 32 consecutive patients were treated. 13 patients initially treated with mastectomy and postoperative irradiation and 19 patients initially treated with breast-conserving surgery and postoperative irradiation developed a local recurrence. The mean dose of previous radiation therapy was 58 Gy (range, 42-64 Gy), applied by conventional fractionation. After implantation +/- surgery of recurrent disease and CT-based 3-D planning, 15 patients were irradiated with HDR-IMBT (intensity-modulated brachytherapy) with a mean dose of 28 Gy (range, 10-30 Gy, 2 x 2.5 Gy/day at 6-h daily interfraction interval) and 17 patients received PDR-IMBT with a mean dose 30 Gy (range, 10-45 Gy, 5 x 1 Gy/day at 2-h pulse intervals). Four patients underwent additional EBRT using a dose of 24-40 Gy electrons. Treatment was performed only on working days. RESULTS: After a mean post-implant follow-up of 19 months (range, 1-83 months), no signs of local recurrence were observed in 20 of the 32 patients. In twelve patients, local recurrence occurred after a mean follow-up of 13 months (range, 1-78 months). 20 of the 32 patients experienced an additional systemic progress. In one patient, an EORTC/RTOG grade 3 side effect (ulceration of the skin) was described, which was followed by a local recurrence 12 months posttherapeutically. CONCLUSION: Perioperative interstitial HDR/PDR-IMBT of localized breast or thoracic wall recurrences following previous full-dose EBRT appears to be a meaningful salvage treatment with acceptable toxicity.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

The CT scanner as a therapy machine.

Many tumors in the brain and in other tissues can be delineated precisely in images obtained with a CT scanner. After the scan is obtained the patient is taken to another room for radiation therapy and is positioned in the beam with the aid of external markers, simulators or stereotactic devices. This procedure is time consuming and subject to error when precise localization of the beam is desired. The CT scanner itself, with the addition of a collimator, is capable of delivering radiation therapy with great precision without the need for external markers. The patient can be scanned and treated on the same table, the isocenter of the beam can be placed precisely in the center of the lesion, the beam can be restricted to just those planes in which the lesion appears several arcs can be obtained by simply tilting the gantry, and the position of the patient in the beam can be monitored continuously during therapy. We describe here the properties of the CTX, the CT scanner modified for therapy.

Animals↗
PubMed1990

Comparison of different radiation types and irradiation geometries in stereotactic radiosurgery.

Recent interest in stereotactic radiosurgery of intracranial lesions, and the development of stereotactic irradiation techniques has led to the need for a systematic and complete comparison of these methods. A method for conducting these comparisons is proposed and is applied to a set of currently-used stereotactic radiosurgical techniques. Three-dimensional treatment planning calculations are used to compare dose distributions for several different radiation types and irradiation geometries. Calculations were performed using charged particles (H, He, C, and Ne ions) and the irradiation geometry currently used at Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory. Photons in the Gamma Knife configuration and the Heidelberg Linac arc method are used. The 3-dimensional dose distributions were evaluated by means of dose-volume histograms and integral doses to the target volume and to normal brain. The effects of target volume, shape and location are studied. The charged particle dose distributions are more favorable than those of the photon methods. The differences between charged particles and photons increase with increasing target volume. The differences between different charged particle species are small, as are the effects of target shape and location.

Humans↗
PubMed2004

[Pilot study of conformal intensity modulated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer].

PURPOSE: - To report our experience on treatment planning and acute toxicity in 16 patients suffering from clinically localized prostate cancer treated with high-dose intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: - Between March 2001 and October 2002, 16 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer were treated with IMRT. Treatment planning included an inverse-planning approach, and the desired beam intensity profiles were delivered by dynamic multileaf collimation. All patients received the entire treatment course with IMRT to a prescribed dose of 78 Gy. All IMRT treatment plans were compared with a theoretical conventional three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT). Acute lower gastro-intestinal (GI) and genito-urinary (GU) toxicity was evaluated in all patients and graded according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0 (CTCAE v. 3.0). A relationship between dose volume and clinical toxicity was evaluated. RESULTS: - Ninety-five percent of the PTV2 received more than 76 Gy using IMRT or 3D-CRT with no difference between both methods. The dose-volume histogram mean obtained for the PTV2 was not different between IMRT and 3D-CRT. IMRT improved homogeneity of the delivered dose to the PTV2 as compared with 3D-CRT (7.5 vs 9%, respectively). Ninety-five percent of the PTV1 received 5 Gy more using IMRT with protection of the bladder and the rectum walls. The benefit was considered below 75 and 70 Gy for the wall of the bladder and the rectum, respectively. Grade 2 GI and GU toxicity was observed in four (25%) and five (31%) patients, respectively. No grade 3 toxicity was observed. There was a trend towards a relationship between the mean rectal dose and acute rectal toxicity but without statistical significant difference (P =0.09). CONCLUSION: - Dose escalation with IMRT is feasible with no grade 3 or higher acute GI or GU toxicity. Examination of a larger cohort and longer-term follow-up are warranted in the future.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2004

The radiation doses to erectile tissues defined with magnetic resonance imaging after intensity-modulated radiation therapy or iodine-125 brachytherapy.

PURPOSE: To report penile bulb (PB) and corporal bodies (CB) doses during intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and permanent (125)I prostate implant alone (BT) for favorable, early stage, clinically localized prostate cancer using computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to provide a basis for comparison as the initial report of a comprehensive project to develop erectile tissues sparing techniques. METHODS AND MATERIAL: Prostate, PB and CB volumes were defined by a fused CT/MRI simulation study performed before treatment in 29 IMRT patients and verification study performed 30 days postimplant in 15 BT patients. The median prescribed prostate dose for the IMRT and BT groups was 74 Gy and 145 Gy, respectively. Dose volume histograms (DVHs) were generated to determine the dose characteristics for the PB, CB, and prostate for each patient. D(90), V(100), and V(50) were used, where D(i) was defined as the dose that covers i% of the prostate volume and V(i) is the fractional volume of the prostate that receives i% of the prescribed dose. The Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to evaluate significance between the groups. RESULTS: The median PB D(90), V(100), and V(50) values were 17.5 Gy, 0%, and 31.9% for the IMRT group; and 52.5 Gy, 21.5%, and 89.7% for the BT group. The median CB D(90), V(100), and V(50) values were 7.3 Gy, 0%, and 0.9% for the IMRT group; and 26.9 Gy, 2.4%, and 20.1% for the BT group. The differences between the IMRT vs. BT V(100) values, but not V(50), were statistically significant for the PB (p = 0.001) and CB (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Radiation dose to the PB and CB is low with IMRT or BT. Magnetic resonance imaging is superior to CT for the imaging of erectile tissues. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy may offer further reductions in the doses received by the PB and CB; however, at what cost to prostate coverage and normal tissue sparing will be the subject of a follow-up study.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

A retrospective analysis to determine if the timing of H&D curve production has a clinically significant effect on the percent difference in agreement of isodose delivery for film-based IMRT QA.

The current practice of film-based intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) quality assurance (QA) involves exposing the QA phantom and subsequently exposing a series of small fields to produce an H&D curve. Both of these procedures currently are completed on the same day. To avoid the need to produce several H&D curves, our current practice is to accumulate at least 10 IMRT cases to perform the QA deliveries concurrently, thereby requiring that we only expose a single film to provide an H&D curve to be utilized for all 10 cases. Our current standard requires that the IMRT QA be completed prior to the first treatment delivery. This standard precludes the facilitation of the possible accumulation of IMRT cases, thereby mandating that we expose many more films for H&D curves. This project will investigate the possibility of applying H&D curves exposed on different days than the IMRT QA. We will determine the percent difference between IMRT QA isodose agreement with planned isodose delivery, given that the H&D curve was performed concurrently VS. the IMRT QA isodose agreement with planned isodose delivery with several different H&D curves taken on random dates. This analysis will be performed using the RIT software. The goal of the project is to determine if the timing of H&D curve production has a clinically significant effect on the percent difference in agreement of isodose delivery for IMRT QA. We will not be recommending the parameters that will define clinical significance but rather report the effect for individual discernment.

Humans↗
PubMed2006

Alternative methods for intensity-modulated radiation therapy inverse planning and dose delivery.

A large number of IMRT systems are currently being marketed. Many of these systems appear to be unique, and manufacturers often emphasize design differences as they argue the merits of their particular approach. This paper focuses on highlighting the underlying feature that is intrinsically part of all IMRT systems. On the other hand, major differences often appear at the implementation stage for dose delivery. Such variations are evident because each manufacturer has a unique approach to balancing the issues of treatment time, leakage radiation reaching the patient's total body, aperture approximation of the ideal intensity maps, increasing the angles of approach for the treatment fields, integration of on-line imaging, selection of treatment distance, availability of different photon energies, and overall system complexity (i.e., cost). How these different issues are handled in the process of system design affects the relative advantages and disadvantages that appear in the final product. This paper takes the approach of dividing the various IMRT methods into categories that are divided roughly along the lines of the technique used during dose delivery to approximate the intensity patterns. Other features of each system are included under these sub-sections.

Humans↗
PubMed2000

Dosimetric effects of patient displacement and collimator and gantry angle misalignment on intensity modulated radiation therapy.

PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVE: The primary goal of this study was to examine systematically the dosimetric effect of small patient movements and linear accelerator angular setting misalignments in the delivery of intensity modulated radiation therapy. We will also provide a method for estimating dosimetric errors for an arbitrary combination of these uncertainties. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sites in two patients (lumbar-vertebra and nasopharynx) were studied. Optimized intensity modulated radiation therapy treatment plans were computed for each patient using a commercially available inverse planning system (CORVUS, NOMOS Corporation, Sewickley, PA). The plans used nine coplanar beams. For each patient the dose distributions and relevant dosimetric quantities were calculated, including the maximum, minimum, and average doses in targets and sensitive structures. The corresponding dose volumetric information was recalculated by purposely varying the collimator angle or gantry angle of an incident beam while keeping other beams unchanged. Similar calculations were carried out by varying the couch indices in either horizontal or vertical directions. The intensity maps of all the beams were kept the same as those in the optimized plan. The change of a dosimetric quantity, Q, for a combination of collimator and gantry angle misalignments and patient displacements was estimated using Delta=Sigma(DeltaQ/Deltax(i))Deltax(i). Here DeltaQ is the variation of Q due to Deltax(i), which is the change of the i-th variable (collimator angle, gantry angle, or couch indices), and DeltaQ/Deltax(i) is a quantity equivalent to the partial derivative of the dosimetric quantity Q with respect to x(i). RESULTS: While the change in dosimetric quantities was case dependent, it was found that the results were much more sensitive to small changes in the couch indices than to changes in the accelerator angular setting. For instance, in the first example in the paper, a 3-mm movement of the couch in the anterior-posterior direction can cause a 38% decrease in the minimum target dose or a 41% increase in the maximum cord dose, whereas a 5 degrees change in the θ(1)=20 degrees beam only gave rise to a 1.5% decrease in the target minimum or 5.1% in the cord maximum. The effect of systematic positioning uncertainties of the machine settings was more serious than random uncertainties, which tended to smear out the errors in dose distributions. CONCLUSIONS: The dose distribution of an intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plan changes with patient displacement and angular misalignment in a complex way. A method was proposed to estimate dosimetric errors for an arbitrary combination of uncertainties in these quantities. While it is important to eliminate the angular misalignment, it was found that the couch indices (or patient positioning) played a much more important role. Accurate patient set-up and patient immobilization is crucial in order to take advantage fully of the technological advances of IMRT. In practice, a sensitivity check should be useful to foresee potential IMRT treatment complications and a warning should be given if the sensitivity exceeds an empirical value. Quality assurance action levels for a given plan can be established out of the sensitivity calculation.

Humans↗
PubMed1998

Spinal cord dose from standard head and neck irradiation: implications for three-dimensional treatment planning.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Treatment with traditional standard field arrangements for patients with head and neck cancer rarely causes myelopathy. Often, initial treatment fields are reduced to avoid the spinal cord after 45 Gy has been delivered and the cord dose that is delivered by 'off-cord' fields is not calculated. To determine a conservative limit to set for the cord dose for conformally-planned field arrangements, the total spinal cord dose delivered with standard opposed lateral fields was evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two types of treatment plans were evaluated for 10 patients enrolled on a parotid-sparing protocol for bilateral head and neck treatment, i.e. (1) standard opposed lateral fields, including large initial fields treating nodal volumes to 45 Gy, off-cord fields for an additional 25 Gy and electron nodal boost fields for an additional 5 Gy and (2) complex 3-D treatment planned field geometries with conformal dose distributions (actual treatment fields). Treatment fields for the protocol conformal plans were arranged so that the maximum cord dose was not to exceed 50 Gy. Dose-volume histograms for both types of planned treatments were analyzed. The maximum and minimum dose to the 1 cm3 cord volume receiving the highest dose were reported. RESULTS: The maximum dose to the cord from the standard composite plans was on average 52 Gy, with a range of 48.9-55.9 Gy. This consisted of an additional 6.3 Gy (average) from the scatter and block transmission dose from the off-cord lateral fields above the prescribed 45 Gy. For the conformal plans, the maximum dose was on average 49.4 Gy (which is protocol criteria). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The maximum spinal cord dose of 50 Gy set as a dose constraint for 3-D treatment planning for conformal plans is a comparable dose to that given in standard opposed lateral head and neck treatments and has been determined to be a conservative spinal cord dose limit, which we have applied in our clinic.

Head and Neck Neoplasms↗
PubMed2001

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) reduces small bowel, rectum, and bladder doses in patients with cervical cancer receiving pelvic and para-aortic irradiation.

PURPOSE: The emergent use of combined modality approach (chemotherapy and radiation therapy) for the treatment of patients with cervical cancer is associated with significant gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) has the potential to deliver adequate dose to the target structures while sparing the normal organs and could also allow for dose escalation to grossly enlarged metastatic lymph node in pelvic or para-aortic area without increasing gastrointestinal/genitourinary complications. We conducted a dosimetric analysis to determine if IMRT can meet these objectives in the treatment of cervical cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Computed tomography scan studies of 10 patients with cervical cancer were retrieved and used as anatomic references for planning. Upon the completion of target and critical structure delineation, the imaging and contour data were transferred to both an IMRT planning system (Corvus, Nomos) and a three-dimensional planning system (Focus, CMS) on which IMRT as well as conventional planning with two- and four-field techniques were derived. Treatment planning was done on these two systems with uniform prescription, 45 Gy in 25 fractions to the uterus, the cervix, and the pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes. Normalization was done to all IMRT plans to obtain a full coverage of the cervix with the 95% isodose curve. Dose-volume histograms were obtained for all the plans. A Student's t test was performed to compute the statistical significance. RESULTS: The volume of small bowel receiving the prescribed dose (45 Gy) with IMRT technique was as follows: four fields, 11.01 +/- 5.67%; seven fields, 15.05 +/- 6.76%; and nine fields, 13.56 +/- 5.30%. These were all significantly better than with two-field (35.58 +/- 13.84%) and four-field (34.24 +/- 17.82%) conventional techniques (p < 0.05). The fraction of rectal volume receiving a dose greater than the prescribed dose was as follows: four fields, 8.55 +/- 4.64%; seven fields, 6.37 +/- 5.19%; nine fields, 3.34 +/- 3.0%; in contrast to 84.01 +/- 18.37% with two-field and 46.37 +/- 24.97% with four-field conventional technique (p < 0.001). The fractional volume of bladder receiving the prescribed dose and higher was as follows: four fields, 30.29 +/- 4.64%; seven fields, 31.66 +/- 8.26%; and nine fields, 26.91 +/- 5.57%. It was significantly worse with the two-field (92.89 +/- 35.26%) and with the four-field (60.48 +/- 31.80%) techniques (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In this dosimetric study, we demonstrated that with similar target coverage, normal tissue sparing is superior with IMRT in the treatment of cervical cancer.

Female↗
PubMed2002

The application of dynamic field shaping and dynamic dose rate control in conformal rotational treatment of the prostate.

The current philosophy of dose escalation in the treatment of prostate cancer has forced the treatment planner to re-evaluate his/her planning approach. Precise and accurate delivery of dose to the prostate while maintaining the required dose limits to the normal critical structures, such as the rectum, has become increasingly difficult in light of these escalated doses. Conformal treatment techniques allow the treatment planner to precisely shape each individual treatment field so that desired volume coverage and normal tissue sparing can be achieved. In addition to these beam-shaping advantages, adjustment of an individual beam's weighting also helps to create the desired distribution and tissue sparing. Rotational therapy "simulates" treatment with multiple beams and angles, similar to the thought process behind conformal treatment technique. With rotational therapy, however, the treatment planner's inability to provide adequate beam shaping and weighting adjustment has placed limits on its value as a viable planning option. The introduction of computer-controlled treatment machines, which allow dynamic adjustment of the field shape with the rotation of the beam, makes it possible to re-evaluate rotational therapy as a potential option. Similarly, the treatment planner's ability to change field weighting can be accomplished by the application of dynamic dose rate control, allowing a rotational beam to deliver a weighting similar to that possible with conformal fixed-field techniques. Dose-volume histogram data will be used to evaluate doses delivered to the prostate, rectum, and bladder using rotational therapy with dynamic field shape and dynamic dose rate control as a treatment planning option. The dose delivery and normal tissue-sparing potential of this technique compared to coplanar and noncoplanar conformal fixed-field techniques will also be presented.

Femur Head↗
PubMed1997

Dose to the contralateral breast: a comparison of two techniques using the enhanced dynamic wedge versus a standard wedge.

The dose to the contralateral breast has been associated with an increased risk of developing a second breast malignancy. Varying techniques have been devised and described in the literature to minimize this dose. Metal beam modifiers such as standard wedges are used to improve the dose distribution in the treated breast, but unfortunately introduce an increased scatter dose outside the treatment field, in particular to the contralateral breast. The enhanced dynamic wedge is a means of remote wedging created by independently moving one collimator jaw through the treatment field during dose delivery. This study is an analysis of differing doses to the contralateral breast using two common clinical set-up techniques with the enhanced dynamic wedge versus the standard metal wedge. A tissue equivalent block (solid water), modeled to represent a typical breast outline, was designed as an insert in a Rando phantom to simulate a standard patient being treated for breast conservation. Tissue equivalent material was then used to complete the natural contour of the breast and to reproduce appropriate build-up and internal scatter. Thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) rods were placed at predetermined distances from the geometric beam's edge to measure the dose to the contralateral breast. A total of 35 locations were used with five TLDs in each location to verify the accuracy of the measured dose. The radiation techniques used were an isocentric set-up with co-planar, non divergent posterior borders and an isocentric set-up with a half beam block technique utilizing the asymmetric collimator jaw. Each technique used compensating wedges to optimize the dose distribution. A comparison of the dose to the contralateral breast was then made with the enhanced dynamic wedge vs. the standard metal wedge. The measurements revealed a significant reduction in the contralateral breast dose with the enhanced dynamic wedge compared to the standard metal wedge in both set-up techniques. The dose was measured at varying distances from the geometric field edge, ranging from 2 to 8 cm. The average dose with the enhanced dynamic wedge was 2.7-2.8%. The average dose with the standard wedge was 4.0-4.7%. Thermoluminescent dosimeter measurements suggest an increase in both scattered electrons and photons with metal wedges. The enhanced dynamic wedge is a practical clinical advance which improves the dose distribution in patients undergoing breast conservation while at the same time minimizing dose to the contralateral breast, thereby reducing the potential carcinogenic effects.

Breast↗
PubMed1994

Uncertainty in delivered dose resulting from the distribution of source activities in a Selectron LDR afterloader.

The uncertainty in the delivered dose resulting from the distribution of 137Cs source activity in a clinical Selectron LDR unit has been studied. A comparison is made of the dose delivered to a point 'A' in an implant with sources of equal activity to the actual dose delivered in the same implant with source activities randomly chosen from the population in the afterloader.

Cesium Radioisotopes↗
PubMed1997

Functional dose-volume histograms for functionally heterogeneous normal organs.

Functional dose-volume histograms are proposed as an extension of the conventional dose-volume histograms, for quantitative assessment of three-dimensional radiation dose coverage of functionally heterogeneous normal organs. Examples are given to illustrate possible applications of this approach to the treatment of a brain tumour or a lung tumour, in which cases the distribution of the normal organ function can be obtained from functional dose-volume modalities. It is shown that a significant difference exists between the functional dose-volume histograms and the conventional dose-volume histograms when the normal organ function is non-uniformly distributed within the organ. Utilization of functional dose-volume histograms as the input for the calculation of normal tissue complication probabilities is discussed for different normal tissue structures.

Humans↗
PubMed1997

A formalism to calculate the output ratio in a mini-phantom for a GE multileaf collimator.

A GE multileaf collimator (MLC) has been recently installed on a Saturne 43 and is used with 6, 18 and 25 MV photon beams. In the integrated GE MLC the lower pair of jaws in the X direction is replaced by 32 pairs of computer controlled opposed tungsten leaves. The influence of each set of leaves on the output ratio is smaller than the influence of the jaws it replaces (8% instead of 10%). For irregular fields it is necessary to evaluate the influence on the output ratio of each independent leaf. It is assumed that each leaf and each jaw have an independent influence on the output ratio. According to this assumption leaf correction functions are derived from measurements as a function of their X position. A second-order correction (less than 1%) has to be applied for the jaw positions. The output ratio in a mini-phantom for a given irregular field can be calculated by the product of the 64 leaf and two jaw correction factors. The formalism is applied to symmetric square and rectangular fields, asymmetric and irregular fields. For all fields checked, the calculated and the measured output ratios agree within 1%. Furthermore the simple formula suggested by Vadash and Bjărngard for square field sizes equivalent to rectangular fields can be used with a good accuracy with an A value of 1.6 for the three energies used. The proposed formalism to calculate the output ratio in a mini-phantom is restricted to fields including the collimator axis with a minimum distance of 2 cm between any leaf and the collimator axis.

Algorithms↗