SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Consensus document”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

14 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

Subgroups and Special Populations in Heart Failure Clinical Trials: Insights From the HFC-ARC Expert Consensus Panel.

In the evolving landscape of heart failure (HF) management, the identification and analysis of subgroups and special populations within clinical trials are crucial for enhancing clinical decision-making, guiding further research, and understanding heterogeneity in study outcomes. This expert consensus document results from the collaborative efforts of the Heart Failure Collaboratory and the Heart Failure Collaboratory Academic Research Consortium, which brought together stakeholders from academia, industry, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, and patient representatives. The purpose of this assembly was to propose standardized definitions and critical endpoint considerations essential for shaping the design and conduct of clinical trials for drugs and devices in the field of HF. In this context, we propose definitions and endpoints for specific subgroups and special populations in the spectrum of HF. We enhanced the precision, efficacy, and applicability of clinical research and promote more "personalized" approaches to interpretation of clinical trials. Furthermore, we explore the burgeoning field of gene therapy as a promising avenue for addressing the genetic basis of certain cardiomyopathies within these specialized patient groups. We focus especially on methodological considerations for subgroup analyses in large-scale trials, highlighting the importance of proper interpretation of subgroups and best practices for identifying heterogeneity suggestive of differential treatment effects, including when these analyses should be considered hypothesis-generating and requiring subsequent validation. We advocate for a methodical approach to clinical trial design, one that prioritizes the strategic identification of subgroups and employs appropriate statistical methodologies to ensure the reliability and clinical relevance of findings. Through this lens, we envision a pathway toward more personalized and effective treatments for HF, ultimately aiming to improve patient outcomes by leveraging the insights garnered from meticulously designed and comprehensively analyzed clinical trials.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

The management of type 1 diabetes in adults. The updated 2026 consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD).

This 2026 consensus report from the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) and the American Diabetes Association (ADA) builds on the 2021 consensus report to provide guidance for managing type 1 diabetes in adults. Reflecting the rapid advances in the field, this update places particular emphasis on the integration of new technologies, while all sections have been revised to incorporate new evidence, advances in clinical practice and novel therapies, including interventions to delay the onset of stage 3 type 1 diabetes. It also broadens its scope to screening for long-term diabetes complications, and the management of obesity and cardiovascular risk factors. Psychosocial care and diabetes self-management education and support (DSMES) remain key elements. The report was developed using the Accurate Consensus Reporting Document (ACCORD) framework. The guidance aligns with the current ADA 'Standards of Care in Diabetes' (Standards of Care) and relevant EASD and ADA documents and aims to support clinicians globally in delivering high-quality, personalised care for adults with type 1 diabetes, with recommendations that can be adapted across diverse healthcare systems and resource settings.

Adjunctive therapy↗

PubMed2026

Diagnosis and management of very rare primary arrhythmia syndromes in children and adults: a Clinical Consensus Statement of the European Heart Rhythm Association of the ESC and the Association of Cardiovascular Nursing & Allied Professions of the ESC, endorsed by the Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology.

Very rare and ultra-rare primary inherited arrhythmia syndromes (IAS) represent a heterogeneous group of disorders associated with a significant risk of sudden cardiac death, often manifesting from foetal life to early adulthood. Current guidelines primarily address more common IAS and provide limited, non-specific recommendations for these rare entities, particularly in paediatric populations. This European Heart Rhythm Association Clinical Consensus Statement, developed in collaboration with the Association of Cardiovascular Nursing and Allied Professions and endorsed by the Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology, integrates available evidence with expert opinion. Recommendations were formulated through structured discussion and voting, following ESC consensus methodology, with a focus on clinically actionable gene-disease associations. The document provides a comprehensive framework for the diagnosis and management of very rare IAS, including calmodulinopathies, Andersen-Tawil syndrome, Timothy syndrome, TRDN-related disease, calcium release deficiency syndrome, and other atypical channelopathies. It highlights age-specific clinical presentations, the importance of genetic testing, and tailored therapeutic strategies, including pharmacological treatments, left cardiac sympathetic denervation, and selective use of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Special attention is given to paediatric considerations, foetal diagnosis, and the role of multidisciplinary care. The document also addresses arrhythmic risk in metabolic and cardiomyopathic conditions, as well as the importance of molecular autopsy and family screening in sudden unexplained death. This consensus document fills a critical gap by providing expert-driven, pragmatic guidance for the management of very rare IAS across the lifespan. It underscores the need for specialized care, international collaboration, and prospective registries to improve evidence generation, risk stratification, and patient outcomes in this vulnerable population.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Latin American consensus on the medical oncologic management of early-stage HR+/HER2- breast cancer: Addressing regional disparities in Spanish-speaking countries.

PURPOSE: Substantial disparities persist in managing early-stage hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-) breast cancer across Spanish-speaking Latin America, including limited access to genomic testing, systemic therapies, and fertility preservation. The Latin American Breast Cancer Association (LABCA) convened an expert panel to produce the first consensus tailored to Spanish-speaking countries. METHODS: A literature review (Embase, PubMed, Scopus, ClinicalKey, LILACS; 2014-2025), informed by ESMO/ASCO/NCCN/SEOM guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024565706), supported statement development. A steering committee of three experts of Spanish nationality supervised the process. Twenty-one specialists from 11 countries participated in a modified Delphi process; 31 items were voted in Round 1 and 25 statements were retained within scope. Consensus was pre-defined as ≥80% agreement (or median 7-9), with a mean/outlier rule reported alongside. RESULTS: Applying the ≥80% rule, 22 of 25 statements (88%) reached full consensus; three (1.3, 2.4, 3.3; 75-76%) were near-consensus and retained with caveats. Recommendations integrated clinicopathologic and molecular factors to guide risk stratification; genomic assays were reserved for selected scenarios and discouraged in very low-risk tumors or ≥4 positive lymph nodes. Consensus also covered ovarian suppression plus endocrine therapy, fertility preservation, sexual-health and genetic evaluation, and adjuvant CDK4/6 and PARP inhibitors when accessible. Marked heterogeneity in access was documented by country and sector. CONCLUSION: This consensus provides the first region-specific, evidence-based, resource-adapted recommendations for early-stage HR+/HER2- breast cancer in Spanish-speaking Latin America, aiming to reduce disparities and strengthen equitable oncology care.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

AISP position statement: Standardising biological sample collection and handling for advanced diagnostics and multi-omic analyses in pancreatic cancer.

The quality of biological samples is a major determinant of analytical reliability and translational relevance in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, variability in specimen procurement, handling, transport, processing, and storage can substantially affect tissue integrity and the robustness of downstream analyses. This paper, promoted by the Pathology and Basic Science Task Force of the Italian Association for the Study of the Pancreas (AISP), brings together experts in pathology, molecular biology, translational research, medical oncology, and gastroenterology to provide practical recommendations for the collection, handling, and pre-analytical management of biological samples. Draft recommendations were discussed during dedicated working group meetings and approved by consensus among all authors, supported by key literature. The document identifies the biological specimen as the critical link between patient care, pathology, and research, and provides guidance for clinicians and professionals involved in sample procurement and processing. By addressing the requirements of different analytical platforms, including genomics, organoid generation, immunophenotyping, pharmacogenomics, and multiplex/spatial analyses, this paper aims to reduce pre-analytical variability, improve diagnostic accuracy, and enhance the clinical and translational value of molecular investigations in pancreatic cancer. Standardised procedures across centres may facilitate comparable data collection, support multicentre studies, and strengthen collaboration between clinicians, pathologists, and research laboratories.

Biobanking↗

PubMed2025

Optimizing participant and community engagement in cancer genomic sequencing research.

PURPOSE: We describe strategies implemented across research centers of the Participant Engagement and Cancer Genome Sequencing (PE-CGS) Network to optimize engagement of participants and communities in cancer genomics research. We also present consensus definitions of engagement and engagement optimization, informed by our shared experiences in the Network. METHODS: Key informant interviews and a document review identified engagement and optimization strategies across PE-CGS research centers. Findings were synthesized using qualitative content analysis. Consensus on definitions of engagement and optimization were developed through iterative review by PE-CGS members. RESULTS: PE-CGS research centers adopted tailored strategies based on community needs and scientific gaps. Engagement strategies included community-based efforts (eg, advisory boards and newsletters) and participant-focused approaches (eg, enhanced informed consent and decision support tools). Optimization strategies leveraged scientific methods (eg, randomized controlled trials and surveys) to evaluate engagement. Engagement was described as the sustained and meaningful interactions between researchers, participants, and communities. Optimization was described as the application of scientific methods to refine and improve engagement and research processes and outcomes. CONCLUSION: Engagement and optimization strategies have informed research planning, conduct, and dissemination across PE-CGS. These approaches and definitions provide a foundation for developing evidence-based practices to strengthen participant and community involvement in cancer genomics research.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Guidelines for evaluating endothelial function in vascular tissue.

The endothelium plays a central role in maintaining vascular homeostasis by orchestrating vascular tone, inflammation, healing, permeability, and thrombosis. Assessing endothelial function in vascular tissue is essential for understanding the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying cardiovascular physiology and pathology. Traditional approaches, such as wire and pressure myography, have been instrumental in defining endothelium-dependent responses and identifying key pharmacological targets. However, the complexity and heterogeneity of endothelial cells across vascular beds and their dynamic phenotypic changes in health and disease necessitate the incorporation of new investigative strategies. Emerging methodologies, including bulk and single-cell transcriptomics, proteomics, and advanced imaging, now provide unprecedented insights into endothelial cell diversity and function. A team of leading experts in the field, who collectively reached a consensus on the most widely used techniques to evaluate endothelial function, developed these guidelines. The document establishes best practices for assessing endothelial function, from endothelial cell cultures to isolated vascular tissues, integrating conventional functional assays with modern molecular approaches. By fostering methodological consistency and embracing innovation, our goal is to enhance rigor, reproducibility, understanding, and discovery in endothelial biology.

Humans↗

PubMed2025

American College of Rheumatology Guidance Statement for Diagnosis and Management of VEXAS Developed by the International VEXAS Working Group Expert Panel.

OBJECTIVE: Vacuoles E1 enzyme X-linked autoinflammatory somatic syndrome (VEXAS) is a recently identified rare genetic disorder associated with somatic mutations in the UBA1 gene. VEXAS presents with a combination of inflammatory and hematologic manifestations, leading to increased morbidity and mortality. METHODS: Given the variability in disease presentation and the limited number of studies to date, no clinical documents currently exist to provide guidance to health care providers about the management of VEXAS. To address this gap, we formed an international multidisciplinary panel of VEXAS experts. RESULTS: Through formalized meetings and a voting process, the group developed consensus clinical guidance considerations for the management of VEXAS. These considerations offer practical advice on several key topics: (1) clinical features of VEXAS, (2) UBA1 screening methods, (3) the diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) in patients with VEXAS, and (4) prognosis and management. The aim is to provide expert guidance on which patients to test, how to test for VEXAS, how to approach MDS in the context of VEXAS, and considerations for management. CONCLUSION: This work marks the first formal international consensus guidance for VEXAS and is intended to be used as a resource for clinicians seeking to understand the disease and its management.

Humans↗

PubMed2025

Autocycler: long-read consensus assembly for bacterial genomes.

MOTIVATION: Long-read sequencing enables complete bacterial genome assemblies, but individual assemblers are imperfect and often produce sequence-level and structural errors. Consensus assembly using Trycycler can improve accuracy, but its lack of automation limits scalability. There is a need for an automated method to generate high-quality consensus bacterial genome assemblies from long-read data. RESULTS: We present Autocycler, a command-line tool for generating accurate bacterial genome assemblies by combining multiple alternative long-read assemblies of the same genome. Without requiring user input, Autocycler builds a compacted De Bruijn graph from the input assemblies, clusters and filters contigs, trims overlaps, and resolves consensus sequences by selecting the most common variant at each locus. It also supports manual curation when desired, allowing users to refine assemblies in challenging or important cases. In our evaluation using Oxford Nanopore Technologies reads from five bacterial isolates, Autocycler outperformed individual assemblers, automated pipelines, and other consensus tools, producing assemblies with lower error rates and improved structural accuracy. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Autocycler is implemented in Rust, open-source, and freely available at github.com/rrwick/Autocycler. It runs on Linux and macOS and is extensively documented.

Genome, Bacterial↗

PubMed2026

Complete genome characterization, phylogenetic analysis, and capsid P2 variation of a goose astrovirus genotype 2 isolate from Guizhou, China.

Goose astrovirus genotype 2 (GAstV-2) is associated with gout and renal disease in goslings, but its occurrence in Guizhou Province remains poorly documented. We isolated a GAstV-2 strain, designated GZJP2024, from goslings with visceral gout on a farm in Jinping County, Guizhou Province, China. PCR detected GAstV-2 but not goose parvovirus, goose reovirus, Tembusu virus, fowl adenovirus, or goose astrovirus genotype 1. Serial passage in goose embryos produced mortality and hemorrhagic lesions during the third passage. Whole-genome sequencing yielded a 7,251-nt genome containing three overlapping open reading frames (ORF1a, ORF1b, and ORF2). Sequence identity and phylogenetic analyses assigned GZJP2024 to the GAstV-2 lineage. ORF1b was the most conserved coding region, whereas ORF2 was more variable. Comparison with consensus sequences from representative GAstV-2 strains identified five amino acid substitutions in ORF1a and ten in ORF2. Four ORF2 substitutions (E456D, L540Q, S608T, and A614T) occurred in the capsid P2 domain and overlapped or neighbored predicted B-cell epitope-rich regions. Template-based mapping placed E456D, S608T, and A614T on exposed regions of a spike-like capsid structure. These findings document a GAstV-2 isolate from a gout-affected goose farm in Guizhou and provide sequence data for future regional surveillance.

Capsid P2↗

PubMed2026

Duplex-Indel: a Snakemake pipeline for somatic Indel calling in Tn5 transposase-based duplex sequencing data.

SUMMARY: Duplex-Indel is a novel Snakemake workflow for detecting somatic small insertions and deletions (Indels) from Tn5 transposase-based duplex sequencing data. Duplex-Indel enhances the accuracy of mutation calling at the single-molecule level by requiring consensus support from both DNA strands for each somatic Indel, minimizing confounding from technical artifacts. Duplex-Indel extends somatic mutation calling in Tn5 transposase-based duplex sequencing data to include Indels. We have demonstrated the accuracy and robustness of Duplex-Indel using cancer cell lines. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Source code and documentation are available under the MIT license on GitHub at https://github.com/ealee-lab/duplex-indel and archived on Zenodo at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19228799.

Transposases↗

PubMed2026

Assessing the public health impact of routinely collected electronic healthcare record data in NICE guidelines: A systematic review of CPRD research.

OBJECTIVES: Evidence used in NICE guidance has traditionally prioritised randomised controlled trials, but increasing availability of electronic health record (EHR) data has expanded opportunities for real-world evidence. The Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) is a commonly used UK primary care EHR resource, yet the extent to which CPRD studies have informed NICE guidelines in the past decade is unclear. STUDY DESIGN: The systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of CPRD studies in PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase published between 04/16-09/25. For each eligible CPRD study, targeted searches of NICE guidelines were performed to identify explicit citations in NICE guidelines. Two reviewers screened and extracted data independently, resolving disagreements by consensus or third reviewer. Guideline information, number of guidelines over time, type of guidelines, and disease area guidelines (using British National Formulary (BNF) chapters) were described. RESULTS: 7181 records were identified. After de-duplication, 2704 unique CPRD studies were screened against NICE guidelines. Of these, 92 CPRD-based studies met inclusion criteria and were cited across 67 NICE documents. The annual number of NICE guidelines citing CPRD studies increased between 2016 and 2025; 1.5% of identified guidelines published in 2016 and 27.7% in 2025. The guideline citing the most CPRD studies was cancer related. The most common types of guidelines included clinical guidelines (49.3%) and technology appraisals (32.8%). Guidelines made up 12 different BNF categories, most frequently central nervous system related (23.9%; n = 16). CONCLUSION: Observational CPRD studies are increasingly referenced in NICE guidelines across multiple disease areas, supporting the growing role of EHR data in national guideline development.

Clinical studies↗

PubMed2026

Precision periodontology in clinical practice: bridging omics and clinical decision-making.

BACKGROUND: Precision periodontology integrates molecular diagnostics, genomics, and advanced imaging into clinical decision-making. Despite major advances in microbiome characterisation, host genetics, and inflammatory biomarkers, their translation into routine care remains limited. OBJECTIVES: To critically appraise current evidence on microbiome-based profiling, genetic and epigenetic markers, host-response biomarkers, and three-dimensional imaging in periodontology, and to propose a conceptual decision-support framework linking diagnostic outputs to potential therapeutic actions and future implementation research. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A narrative review searching PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, and the Cochrane Library (2010-2025) using terms related to precision periodontology, subgingival microbiome, periodontitis genetics and epigenetics, salivary and GCF biomarkers, aMMP-8, CBCT, risk assessment, and artificial intelligence. Priority was given to meta-analyses, systematic reviews, longitudinal studies, and guideline documents. RESULTS: Microbiological testing has defined but narrow indications; single-SNP genotyping has not demonstrated clinical utility commensurate with cost; aMMP-8 point-of-care testing is among the most extensively investigated host-response tools and may have adjunctive value in selected monitoring and peri-implant scenarios; however, current evidence remains insufficient to support routine diagnostic implementation. CBCT may directly influence surgical decision-making through defect morphology characterisation. AI-based models show promise but lack prospective clinical validation. These conclusions are consistent with the 20th EFP Workshop Consensus Report. CONCLUSIONS: Precision periodontology currently operates in addition to, rather than in replacement of, conventional staging and grading. We propose a conceptual decision-threshold framework for the selective consideration of molecular and advanced imaging tools when their additive contribution may meaningfully inform management. This framework should be regarded as a research-oriented decision-support model rather than a validated clinical algorithm. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Clinicians are provided with a structured, evidence-based framework that identifies specific clinical scenarios where molecular diagnostics, host-response biomarkers, and three-dimensional imaging may meaningfully modify periodontal treatment decisions, supporting the operationalisation of precision approaches in daily practice.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Epilepsy of infancy with migrating focal seizures: A scoping review of clinical features, diagnostic testing including genetics, long-term outcomes, mortality, and current and emerging therapeutic strategies.

BACKGROUND: Epilepsy of infancy with migrating focal seizures (EIMFS) is among the most severe developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DEEs), marked by intractable multifocal seizures migrating across both hemispheres, profound developmental arrest, and high early mortality. Advances in next-generation sequencing have revealed a heterogeneous genetic architecture dominated by KCNT1 gain-of-function variants across more than 30 implicated genes, creating opportunities for precision therapeutics. OBJECTIVE: To systematically map published evidence on the clinical, electrophysiological, neuroimaging, genetic, and therapeutic landscape of EIMFS, and to delineate critical knowledge gaps and future research priorities. METHODS: A scoping review was conducted following the Arksey and O'Malley framework, searching PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library/CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov. RESULTS: Of 643 articles screened, 89 met inclusion criteria. Beyond confirmation of the canonical electroclinical phenotype, several gaps emerged: neonatal versus post-neonatal onset stratification by genetic etiology remains largely uncharacterized; genotype-specific EEG biomarkers are lacking except for a single small KCNT1 study; and the clinical significance of atypical EEG features-including burst suppression and hypsarrhythmia-is undefined. Neuroimaging literature documents progressive cerebral atrophy and myelination abnormalities without quantitative volumetry, diffusion tractography markers, or attribution to seizure burden, medication effects, or underlying etiology. Genetic diagnostic yield was 70-80%, with KCNT1 accounting for 30-50% of solved cases; however, genotype-outcome stratification is limited. Seizures were broadly refractory; potassium bromide, ketogenic diet, cannabidiol, and quinidine (in KCNT1-confirmed cases) showed partial efficacy. Emerging precision approaches include sodium channel blockers for SCN2A gain-of-function variants, novel small molecules, fluoxetine, antisense oligonucleotides, and divalent siRNA targeting KCNT1. Systemic-to-pulmonary collateral circulation causing severe cardiopulmonary complications was reported across multiple cases, yet no consensus screening protocol exists. CONCLUSIONS: EIMFS remains one of the most refractory epilepsy syndromes of infancy. Precision genetic diagnosis is essential to guide targeted therapy. International collaborative registries, standardized outcome measures, genotype-stratified biomarker studies, and rapid point-of-care genomic testing are urgently needed to advance evidence-based care for this highly vulnerable population.

Humans↗