PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Histone Code”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

[Variations on the topic of the "histone code"].

Histones are the fundamental structural proteins intimately associated with eukaryotic DNA to form a highly ordered and condensed nucleoproteic complex termed chromatin. They are the targets of various posttranslational modifications including acetylation, methylation, phosphorylation and ubiquitination that modulate the structure/function of chromatin. The combinatorial nature of histone modifications is hypothesized to define a "histone code" that considerably extends the information potential of the genetic code, giving rise to epigenetic information. Moreover, most core histones consist of several nonallelic variants that can mark specific loci and could play an important role in establishment and maintenance of epigenetic memory. Here we will briefly present our current knowledge about histone posttranslational modifications and their implications in the regulation of epigenetic information. We will next describe core histone variants, insisting on their mode of incorporation into chromatin to discuss their epigenetic function and inheritance.

Histones↗

The chromatin regulatory code: beyond a histone code.

In this commentary on the contribution by Arndt Benecke in this issue, I discuss why the notion of "chromatin code" introduced and elaborated in this paper is to be preferred to that of "histone code". Speaking of a code as regards nucleosome conformation and histone tail post-translational modifications only makes sense within the chromatin fiber, where their physico-chemical features can be translated into regulatory programs at the genome level, by means of a complex, multi-level interplay with the fiber architecture and dynamics settled in the course of Evolution. In particular, this chromatin code presumably exploits allosteric transitions of the chromatin fiber. The chromatin structure dependence of its translation suggests two alternative modes of transcription initiation regulation, also proposed in the paper by A. Benecke in this issue for interpreting strikingly bimodal micro-array data.

Chromatin↗

A SANT motif in the SMRT corepressor interprets the histone code and promotes histone deacetylation.

Nuclear receptor corepressors SMRT (silencing mediator of retinoid and thyroid receptors) and N-CoR (nuclear receptor corepressor) recruit histone deacetylase (HDAC) activity to targeted regions of chromatin. These corepressors contain a closely spaced pair of SANT motifs whose sequence and organization is highly conserved. The N-terminal SANT is a critical component of a deacetylase activation domain (DAD) that binds and activates HDAC3. Here, we show that the second SANT motif functions as part of a histone interaction domain (HID). The HID enhances repression by increasing the affinity of the DAD-HDAC3 enzyme for histone substrate. The two SANT motifs synergistically promote histone deacetylation and repression through unique functions. The HID contribution to repression is magnified by its ability to inhibit histone acetyltransferase enzyme activity. Remarkably, the SANT-containing HID preferentially binds to unacetylated histone tails. This implies that the SMRT HID participates in interpreting the histone code in a feed-forward mechanism that promotes and maintains histone deacetylation at genomic sites of SMRT recruitment.

Acetylation↗

A histone code in meiosis: the histone kinase, NHK-1, is required for proper chromosomal architecture in Drosophila oocytes.

To promote faithful propagation of the genetic material during sexual reproduction, meiotic chromosomes undergo specialized morphological changes that ensure accurate segregation of homologous chromosomes. The molecular mechanisms that establish the meiotic chromosomal structures are largely unknown. We describe a mutation in a recently identified Histone H2A kinase, nhk-1, in Drosophila that leads to female sterility due to defects in the formation of the meiotic chromosomal structures. The metaphase I arrest and the karyosome, a critical prophase I chromosomal structure, require nucleosomal histone kinase-1 (NHK-1) function. The defects are a result of failure to disassemble the synaptonemal complex and to load condensin onto the mutant chromosomes. Embryos laid by nhk-1-/- mutant females arrest with aberrant polar bodies and mitotic spindles, revealing that mitosis is affected as well. We analyzed the role of Histone H2A phosphorylation with respect to the histone code hypothesis and found that it is required for acetylation of Histone H3 and Histone H4 in meiosis. These studies reveal a critical role for histone modifications in chromosome dynamics in meiosis and mitosis.

Animals↗

Translating the histone code into leukemia.

The "histone code" is comprised of the covalent modifications of histone tails that function to regulate gene transcription. The post-translational modifications that occur in histones within the regulatory regions of genes include acetylation, methylation, phosphorylation, ubiquitination, sumoylation, and ADP-ribosylation. These modifications serve to alter chromatin structure and accessibility, and to act as docking sites for transcription factors or other histone modifying enzymes. Several of the factors that are disrupted by chromosomal translocations associated with hematological malignancies can alter the histone code in a gene-specific manner. Here, we discuss how the histone code may be disrupted by chromosomal translocations, either directly by altering the activity of histone modifying enzymes, or indirectly by recruitment of this type of enzyme by oncogenic transcription factors. These alterations in the histone code may alter gene expression pattern to set the stage for leukemogenesis.

Amino Acid Motifs↗

How does the histone code work?

Patterns of histone post-translational modifications correlate with distinct chromosomal states that regulate access to DNA, leading to the histone-code hypothesis. However, it is not clear how modification of flexible histone tails leads to changes in nucleosome dynamics and, thus, chromatin structure. The recent discovery that, like the flexible histone tails, the structured globular domain of the nucleosome core particle is also extensively modified adds a new and exciting dimension to the histone-code hypothesis, and calls for the re-examination of current models for the epigenetic regulation of chromatin structure. Here, we review these findings and other recent studies that suggest the structured globular domain of the nucleosome core particle plays a key role regulating chromatin dynamics.

Acetylation↗

Cellular memory and the histone code.

The histone tails on the nucleosome surface are subject to enzyme-catalyzed modifications that may, singly or in combination, form a code specifying patterns of gene expression. Recent papers provide insights into how a combinatorial code might be set and read. They show how modification of one residue can influence that of another, even when they are located on different histones, and how modifications at specific genomic locations might be perpetuated on newly assembled chromatin.

Histones↗

Molecular analysis of the histone gene cluster of psammechinus miliaris: II. The arrangement of the five histone-coding and spacer sequences.

Histone DNA of Psammechinus miliaris was obtained in an enriched form by buoyant density gradient centrifugation and was cleaved into 6 kb repeat units (Birnstiel et al., 1975a) by the action of the specific endonucleases EcoRI and HindIII. Since it was suspected that the 6 kb unit harbored all five histone-coding sequences, the histone DNA unit was subdivided into five segments with the aim of providing five fragments carrying just one coding sequence each. This was achieved by the combined use of EcoRI Hindll, Hindlll, and Hpa I. A physical map was constructed from the overlaps arising in these restriction experiments. Each of the five segments was shown to hybridize uniquely with just one of the five highly purified histone mRNAs (Gross et al., 1976a). By this procedure, the order of the mRNA sequences on the histone DNA was found to be a, c, d, b, e (Gross et al., 1976a), and hence of the protein coding sequences H4, H2B, H3, H2A, and H1. Further evidence is presented that the 6 kb repeat unit, amplified by means of a Murray lambda vector phage, contains AT-rich DNA sequences which would be expected not to code for histone proteins.

Adenine↗

Human histone demethylase LSD1 reads the histone code.

Human histone demethylase LSD1 is a flavin-dependent amine oxidase that catalyzes the specific removal of methyl groups from mono- and dimethylated Lys4 of histone H3. The N-terminal tail of H3 is subject to various covalent modifications, and a fundamental question in LSD1 biology is how these epigenetic marks affect the demethylase activity. We show that LSD1 does not have a strong preference for mono- or dimethylated Lys4 of H3. Substrate recognition is not confined to the residues neighboring Lys4, but it requires a sufficiently long peptide segment consisting of the N-terminal 20 amino acids of H3. Electrostatic interactions are an important factor in protein-substrate recognition, as indicated by the high sensitivity of Km to ionic strength. We have probed LSD1 for its ability to demethylate Lys4 in presence of a second modification on the same peptide substrate. Methylation of Lys9 does not affect enzyme catalysis. Conversely, Lys9 acetylation causes an almost 6-fold increase in the Km value, whereas phosphorylation of Ser10 totally abolishes activity. LSD1 is inhibited by a demethylated peptide with an inhibition constant of 1.8 microM, suggesting that LSD1 can bind to H3 independently of Lys4 methylation. LSD1 is a chromatin-modifying enzyme, which is able to read different epigenetic marks on the histone N-terminal tail and can serve as a docking module for the stabilization of the associated corepressor complex(es) on chromatin.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Molecular analysis of the histone gene cluster of Psammechinus miliaris: III. Polarity and asymmetry of the histone-coding sequences.

Fragments of histone DNA produced by restriction endonucleases contain 5' and 3' termini with defined topologies relative to the histone-coding sequences. After limited resection with lambda-exonuclease, the 6 kb Hindlll histone DNA fragment (see Schaffner et al., 1976) hybridizes to H4 histone mRNA whether or not the DNA has been denatured. This shown that the coding sequence for the histone H4 is proximal to the 3' terminus of the Hindlll restriction fragment. By contrast, lambda-exonuclease digestion of the 6 kb EcoRI histone DNA fragment drastically reduces hybridization of the H4 mRNA. Hence in this molecule, the H4 DNA sequence is near a 5' terminus of the EcoRI restriction fragment. From these results and those described in the preceding paper (Schaffner et al., 1976), the polarity of the H4 gene is therefore 5' H2B leads to H4 leads to H1 3'. Cloned Psammechinus histone DNA (S. G. Clarkson, H. Smith, W. Schaffner, K. Gross, and M. Birnstiel, manuscript submitted for publication) may be strand-separated by electrophoresis. Highly purified histone mRNAs (Gross et al., 1976) all hybridize almost exclusively to the strand of lesser electrophoretic mobility. It follows that all coding sequences are arranged in tandem within the same DNA strand, and that hence they share the same polarity as the H4 DNA sequences. Transcription therefore proceeds in the gene cluster in the direction H4 leads to H2B leads to H3 leads to H2A leads to H1.

Animals↗

It takes a PHD to read the histone code.

The pattern of histone modifications, called the histone code, influences transitions between chromatin states and the regulation of transcriptional activity. Four recent papers describe how plant homeodomain (PHD) finger proteins read part of this code. The PHD finger may promote both gene expression and repression through interactions with trimethylated lysine 4 on histone 3 (H3K4), a universal modification at the beginning of active genes.

Chromatin↗

Facile synthesis of site-specifically acetylated and methylated histone proteins: reagents for evaluation of the histone code hypothesis.

The functional capacity of genetically encoded histone proteins can be powerfully expanded by posttranslational modification. A growing body of biochemical and genetic evidence clearly links the unique combinatorial patterning of side chain acetylation, methylation, and phosphorylation mainly within the highly conserved N termini of histones H2A, H2B, H3, and H4 with the regulation of gene expression and chromatin assembly and remodeling, in effect constituting a "histone code" for epigenetic signaling. Deconvoluting this code has proved challenging given the inherent posttranslational heterogeneity of histone proteins isolated from biological sources. Here we describe the application of native chemical ligation to the preparation of full-length histone proteins containing site-specific acetylation and methylation modifications. Peptide thioesters corresponding to histone N termini were prepared by solid phase peptide synthesis using an acid labile Boc/HF assembly strategy, then subsequently ligated to recombinantly produced histone C-terminal globular domains containing an engineered N-terminal cysteine residue. The ligation site is then rendered traceless by hydrogenolytic desulfurization, generating a native histone protein sequence. Synthetic histones generated by this method are fully functional, as evidenced by their self-assembly into a higher order H3/H4 heterotetramer, their deposition into nucleosomes by human ISWI-containing (Imitation of Switch) factor RSF (Remodeling and Spacing Factor), and by enzymatic modification by human Sirt1 deacetylase and G9a methyltransferase. Site-specifically modified histone proteins generated by this method will prove invaluable as novel reagents for the evaluation of the histone code hypothesis and analysis of epigenetic signaling mechanisms.

Acetylation↗

Chromosome-wide, allele-specific analysis of the histone code on the human X chromosome.

Variation in the composition of chromatin has been proposed to generate a 'histone code' that epigenetically regulates gene expression in a variety of eukaryotic systems. As a result of the process of X chromosome inactivation, chromatinon the mammalian inactive X chromosome (Xi) is marked by several modifications, including histone hypoacetylation, trimethylation of lysine 9 on histone H3 (H3TrimK9) and substitution of core histone H2A with the histone variant MacroH2A. H3TrimK9 is a well-studied marker for heterochromatin in many organisms, but the distribution and function of MacroH2A are less clear. Cytologically, the Xi in human cells comprises alternating and largely non-overlapping approximately 10-15 Mb domains marked by MacroH2A and H3TrimK9. To examine the genomic deposition of MacroH2A, H3TrimK9 and acetylated histone H4 modifications on the Xi at higher resolution, we used chromatin immunoprecipitation in combination with a SNP-based assay to distinguish the Xi and active X (Xa) in a diploid female cell line and to determine quantitatively the relative enrichment of these histone code elements on the Xi relative to the Xa. Although we found a majority of sites were enriched for either MacroH2A or H3TrimK9 in a manner consistent with the cytological appearance of the Xi, a range of different histone code types were detected at different sites along the X. These findings suggest that the nature of the heterochromatin histone code associated with X inactivation may be more heterogeneous than previously thought and imply that gene silencing can be achieved by a variety of different epigenetic mechanisms whose genomic, evolutionary or developmental basis is now amenable to investigation.

Acetylation↗

Reading and function of a histone code involved in targeting corepressor complexes for repression.

A central question in histone code theory is how various codes are recognized and utilized in vivo. Here we show that TBL1 and TBLR1, two WD-40 repeat proteins in the corepressor SMRT/N-CoR complexes, are functionally redundant and essential for transcriptional repression by unliganded thyroid hormone receptors (TR) but not essential for transcriptional activation by liganded TR. TBL1 and TBLR1 bind preferentially to hypoacetylated histones H2B and H4 in vitro and have a critical role in targeting the corepressor complexes to chromatin in vivo. We show that targeting SMRT/N-CoR complexes to the deiodinase 1 gene (D1) requires at least two interactions, one between unliganded TR and SMRT/N-CoR and the other between TBL1/TBLR1 and hypoacetylated histones. Neither interaction alone is sufficient for the stable association of the corepressor complexes with the D1 promoter. Our data support a feed-forward working model in which deacetylation exerted by initial unstable recruitment of SMRT/N-CoR complexes via their interaction with unliganded TR generates a histone code that serves to stabilize their own recruitment. Similarly, we find that targeting of the Sin3 complex to pericentric heterochromatin may also follow this model. Our studies provide an in vivo example that a histone code is not read independently but is recognized in the context of other interactions.

Acetylation↗

Evidence for the existence of an HP1-mediated subcode within the histone code.

Currently, the mammalian heterochromatic proteins HP1alpha, HP1beta and the pan-nuclear HP1gamma are considered 'gatekeepers' of methyl-K9-H3-mediated silencing. Understanding how the binding of these proteins to post-translationally modified histones is switched on and off will further our knowledge of how the histone code is modulated. Here, we report that all three HP1 isoforms can be extensively modified, similar to histones, suggesting that the silencing of gene expression may be further regulated beyond the histone code. To assess the potential impact of these modifications, we analysed the phosphorylation of HP1gamma at Ser 83 as a 'model modification'. We demonstrate that P-Ser 83-HP1gamma has an exclusively euchromatic localization, interacts with Ku70 (a regulatory protein involved in multiple nuclear procesess), has impaired silencing activity and serves as a marker for transcription elongation. These observations predict that regulation of silencing by methyl-K9-H3 through modification of mammalian HP1 proteins may be more complex than previously thought and suggests the existence of an HP1-mediated 'silencing subcode' that underlies the instructions of the histone code.

Acetylation↗

Resetting the epigenetic histone code in the MRL-lpr/lpr mouse model of lupus by histone deacetylase inhibition.

The baseline level of gene expression varies between healthy controls and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients, and among SLE patients themselves. These variations may explain the different clinical manifestations and severity of disease observed in SLE. Epigenetic mechanisms, which involve DNA and histone modifications, are predictably associated with distinct transcriptional states. To understand the interplay between various histone modifications, including acetylation and methylation, and lupus disease, we performed differential expression histone modification analysis in splenocytes from the MRL-lpr/lpr mouse model of lupus. Using stable isotope labeling in combination with mass spectrometry, we found global site-specific hypermethylation (except H3 K4 methylation) and hypoacetylation in histone H3 and H4 MRL-lpr/lpr mice compared to control MRL/MPJ mice. Moreover, we have identified novel histone modifications such as H3 K18 methylation, H4 K31 methylation, and H4 K31 acetylation that are differentially expressed in MRL-lpr/lpr mice compared to controls. Finally, in vivo administration of the histone deacetylase inhibitor trichostatin A (TSA) corrected the site-specific hypoacetylation states on H3 and H4 in MRL-lpr/lpr mice with improvement of disease phenotype. Thus, this study is the first to establish the association between aberrant histone codes and pathogenesis of autoimmune disease SLE. These aberrant post-translational histone modifications can therefore be reset with histone deacetylase inhibition in vivo.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Regulated nucleosome mobility and the histone code.

Post-translational modifications of the histone tails are correlated with distinct chromatin states that regulate access to DNA. Recent proteomic analyses have revealed several new modifications in the globular nucleosome core, many of which lie at the histone-DNA interface. We interpret these modifications in light of previously published data and propose a new and testable model for how cells implement the histone code by modulating nucleosome dynamics.

Adenosine Triphosphate↗