SEARCH · PubMed Health
Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Speech-elicited acoustic reflexes and three measures of subjective loudness perceptions were administered to 10 normal ears and to 20 ears with confirmed sensorineural hearing loss. Most notable was the comparison between loudness discomfort level and the acoustic reflex, revealing a limited relationship. The use of the acoustic reflex as a clinical predictor of loudness discomfort is questioned.
In binocular brightness perception a phenomenon called Fechner's paradox can be observed. This paradox implies non-monotonicities in the psychometric functions of binocular brightness. Lehky (1983) proposed a model that describes such non-monotonicities. He suggested that Fechner's paradox also exists in binaural loudness perception. However, until now no sufficient data have been collected to test this hypothesis. Therefore, an experiment was conducted in which 36 psychometric functions were obtained using binaural stimuli in the range of intensities in which Fechner's paradox supposedly occurs. As a result, no significant non-monotonicities were found. However, it is shown that jnds derived from the psychometric functions contradict predictions derived from the limited binaural additivity model of Gigerenzer and Strube (1983).
The effect of masking noise on the temporal summation of loudness is investigated here by performing loudness balances between a standard 500-msec tone burst (1000 Hz at either 20-, 50-, or 80-dB SPL) and either masked or unmasked comparison tone bursts (1000 Hz with durations between 10 and 640 msec). In all but two instances, the obtained functions relating SPL for equal loudness to stimulus duration could be plotted as two line segments that met to form a knee. The slopes of the line segments at durations less than the kneepoints are altered by the masking noise, becoming less steep with increased masking. The rate of the slope decrease is related to the standard sound pressure level (SPL) and is greatest using the 80-dB SPL standard and least with the 20-dB SPL standard. Temporal summation of loudness continues at durations above the kneepoints. However, the obtained slopes are less than those found below the knee, and are independent of the test conditions. The slope changes are found to be related to the noise producing a power transformation on the operating characteristics of the auditory system. These latter findings are discussed in relation to Zwislocki's quantitative theory of the temporal summation of loudness.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
To estimate the relationship between musical preference and perceived loudness, 25 subjects, musicians and nonmusicians, were asked to match the loudness of a neutral stimulus to a given musical selection. Ten different types of music were used; each was rated for likability by the subject. Over-all analysis of loudness ratings indicated that nonmusicians were more accurate in matching loudness of a neutral stimulus with the musical selections. This finding suggests differences in loudness perception between musicians and nonmusicians. Both groups were most accurate on the selection which could be inferred as most familiar.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
In this paper, we describe an extension of our preliminary theory of intensity resolution [Durlach and Braida, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 46, 372-383 (1969)] to include loudness comparisons among different types of stimuli. The extended theory relates mean loudness matches to discrimination and provides a framework for the interpretation of results on the intrasubject variability of loudness comparisons. The predicted relation between mean loudness matches and discrimination is essentially the same as that proposed by Riesz [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 5, 211-216 (1933)]. With regard to the variability of loudness comparisons, the extended model is essentially the same as the preliminary model except that a new term is included in the trace-mode memory variance to account for the dissimilarity of the stimuli being compared. The model is compared to some published data on loudness matching and discrimination and to some new data of our own on the variability of loudness comparisons obtained in a two-interval, roving-level, loudness-discrimination experiment.
This article explored the slippery context effect: When Ss judge the loudness of tones that differ in sound frequency as well as intensity, stimulus context (relative intensity levels at the 2 frequencies) can strongly influence the levels that are judged equally loud. It is shown that the size of the slippery context effect depends on the frequency difference between the tones: Small frequency differences (less than a critical bandwidth) produced essentially no slippery effect; much larger differences produced substantial effects. These results are consistent with a model postulating the existence of a central attentional or preattentive "filter-like" process whose weighting coefficients represent the size of the absolute as opposed to the relative (contextual) component of loudness perception and judgment.
In this paper, a method that has been developed for the assessment and quantification of loudness perception in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired persons is described. The method has been named LGOB, which stands for loudness growth in 1/2-octave bands. The method uses 1/2-octave bands of noise, centered at 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, and 4.0 kHz, with subjective levels between a subject's threshold of hearing and the "too loud" level. The noise bands are presented to the subject, randomized over frequency and level, and the subject is asked to respond with a loudness rating (one of: VERY SOFT, SOFT, OK, LOUD, VERY LOUD, TOO LOUD). Subject responses (normal and hearing-impaired) are then compared to the average responses of a group of normal-hearing subjects. This procedure allows one to estimate the subject's loudness growth relative to normals, as a function of frequency and level. The results may be displayed either as isoloudness contours or as recruitment curves. In its present form, the measurements take less than 30 min. The signal presentation and analysis is done using a PC and a PC plug-in board having a digital to analog converter.
Auditory brain stem responses evoked with click stimuli of varying repetition rates (11, 31, 51, and 91 clicks/sec) and intensities but judged as being equally loud as three reference loudness levels (90, 80, and 70 phons) were examined in normal-hearing listeners. Analysis of wave component latencies and amplitudes indicated that loudness level changes are reflected in the brain stem response. However, the combined influence of stimulus rate and intensity was greater than that of perceived loudness level. It was concluded that the auditory brain stem response does not provide a direct link to loudness perception.
Hearing impairment is more than a sensitivity loss. The causes of reduced discrimination can be found also in deteriorations in loudness perception (recruitment), frequency resolution and temporal resolution. Only recruitment can be compensated for by modern hearing aids, namely by the reduction of the dynamic range by means of compression. However, the introduction of compression introduces temporal distortions, which may deteriorate the temporal cues of speech. In this study the perception of nonsense consonant-vowel-consonant-words presented through hearing aids was studied in a group of 12 hearing-impaired listeners. Phoneme perception in conditions with and without compression was analyzed and related to temporal parameters of the listeners' hearing. A detailed analysis of the patterns of confusions revealed clear qualitative differences in the perception of phonemes with and without compression. These differences can be related to an improved perception of temporal cues like the preburst silent interval of plosives and to spectral changes induced by the activation of the compression circuit. A reduced temporal resolution is disadvantageous for the perception of temporal cues like plosive detection, but our data do not suggest that the perception of temporal cues is hampered excessively by temporal distortions from the compression circuit itself.
Twelve patients with sensorineural hearing loss were stimulated by a transtympanic electrode contacting the cochlear promontory. Nine of them were tested to study hearing perception associated with various features of electrical signals, using an auditory electrical stimulator. Biphasic pulse bursts and sine-wave bursts were used as stimuli. Different electrical characteristics such as amplitude, width and rate for pulses and amplitude and frequency for sine waves were used to investigate hearing perception. The patients' perception threshold, comfortable level, uncomfortable level, dynamic range, just-noticeable difference in frequency or pitch discrimination, just-noticeable difference in intensity or loudness discrimination, loudness perception associated with the electrical signal energy, and sounds associated with electrical stimulation was determined. Pertinent results assisted in the development of a speech electrical stimulator that was used to test three patients for vowel, word, and consonant identification and recognition of patterns of intonation. These results in turn are being used to design a prototype of a single-channel extracochlear prosthesis.
The performance of heart valve prostheses is generally judged by the rate of valve-related complications and the hemodynamic performance. Patients may be severely bothered by the metallic click generated by the closure of the valve. In 74 patients after valve replacement with Duromedics Edwards (DE) (n = 38) and St. Jude Medical (SJM) (n = 36) prostheses the sound energy was recorded and correlated to the complaints of the patients. At a distance of 10 cm the DE valves produced a significantly higher sound pressure with 47 +/- 7 db(A) compared to the SJM valves with 39.8 +/- 5 db(A) (p = 0.001). The noise level was also different for the valves in aortic or mitral position. After splitting into frequency bands the highest sound pressure was observed in the high frequency ranges (8 to 16 kHz) which represents the metallic click. 65% of patients were aware of the noise generated by the valve, 16% had sleep disturbances and 22% would prefer a more silent valve type. 12 of 38 patients with DE valves and 4 of 36 patients with SJM valves wished to have a less noisy valve type (Chi square p = 0.003). In annoyed patients the valves produced a higher sound amplitude of 49 +/- 8 db(A) as compared to undisturbed patients with 42 +/- 6 db(A) (p = 0.002). The noise level of mechanical heart valves should be considered before selection of a prosthesis, because the metallic click bothers patients and the complaints correlate with measured sound energy.
Although hearing aids have shown little outward change in the past decade, the development of new components has produced a steady reduction in size and improvement in performance. The near-perfect electret condenser microphone occupies a mere 50 cubic millimeters and its low vibrational sensitivity permits close packing of components without acoustic feedback problems. The integrated circuit packs a hundred components into each cubic millimeter and has allowed the miniaturization of complex aids while simultaneously boosting performance. Integrated circuits will permit future aids to compensate distorted loudness perception as a function of frequency, and extract speech signals buried in noise. These sophisticated, computerized, hearing aids will demand new evaluation and fitting methods and it is the methodology rather than the technology that will pace their development.
The effects of prestimulus activity levels on auditory responsiveness were evaluated in newborn chickens. Rates of peeping were used as measures of prestimulus activity, and delays in the otherwise ongoing vocalizations were used as measures of responsiveness. Results show increased responsiveness to pure tones at intermediate levels of prestimulus activity. Responsiveness is reduced during periods of high and low activity. The effect is strongest just prior to the stimulus. Similar analyses could be useful in other studies that depend on the changing rate of repetitive responses, such as gross body movements, head turning, heart rate, and perhaps neural potentials. Some of the variability in the responses of young subjects can be controlled by measuring the subject's activity at the time a stimulus is presented.
The present study demonstrates that acoustic stimuli which induce a startle response (ASR) also evoke ultrasonic vocalization in the rat. Sound recordings were done on three consecutive days of testing during sessions of 20 acoustic stimuli each and on the following day for three minutes following 5 acoustic stimuli (nonstimulus condition). Startle-inducing stimuli evoked continuous ultrasonic calling which was maintained throughout testing. Immediately following each acoustic stimulus, however, vocalization was interrupted by a period of silence (gap). The mean duration of sounds was reduced and the interpulse interval tended to increase during acoustic stimulation as compared to the nonstimulus condition. It is concluded that startle-eliciting stimuli induce a state of fear in the rat and that the acoustic-startle-elicited ultrasonic vocalization may provide a novel model in the study of anxiety.
Three experiments were performed to examine the reverberation cue to egocentric auditory distance and to determine the extent to which such a cue could provide 'absolute', as contrasted with 'relative', information about distance. In experiment 1 independent groups of blindfolded observers (200 altogether) were presented with broadband noise from a speaker at one of five different distances (0.55 to 8 m) in a normal hard-walled room. Half of each group of observers were presented with the sound at 0 deg azimuth, followed (after a delay) by the identical sound at 90 deg azimuth. The order of presentation was reversed for the remaining observers. Perceived distance varied significantly as a function of the physical distance to the speaker, even for the first presentations. The change in the binaural information between the 0 deg and 90 deg presentations did not significantly modify the results. For both orientations, near distances were overestimated and far distances were underestimated. Experiment 2 and 3 were designed to evaluate how much prior auditory exposure to the laboratory environment was necessary. A 200 Hz square-wave signal was presented from one of three distances (1, 2, or 6 m) to observers who had either minimal room information or an exposure which included talking within the room. Perceived distance varied significantly with physical distance regardless to exposure condition.
A series of experiments investigated listeners' ability simultaneously to process information across different acoustic dimensions. On each trial, the listener heard a pair of brief n-tone sequences (n = 1 to 12). The frequency, intensity, and duration of each tone in the sequence varied randomly from trial to trial. On average, the values of these three parameters were greater for one sequence, the target, than the other, the nontarget. The listener's task was to identify the target on each trial. For an ideal observer in this task, d' performance grows as the square root n. Obtained d' grew at a rate slightly less than the square root of n. Close to cube root of n growth was observed when the average difference occurred in only one of the three tone parameter values within a block of trials. Although performance fell short of ideal, optimum weights were consistently given to each tone and each parameter. The results are consistent with a model in which performance depends predominantly on the information content of the sounds regardless of how the information is "packaged" in the stimulus. Transmitted information is estimated to be 0.9-2.0 bits within a single acoustic dimension, 2.1-3.0 bits when distributed across dimensions.