PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Spinal Fusion”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2026

Comparison of Ketamine and Pregabalin on Postoperative Opioid Usage and Pain Management in Spinal Fusion: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Spinal fusion is associated with substantial early postoperative pain and opioid exposure. Both ketamine and pregabalin are widely incorporated into Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols as opioid-sparing adjuncts. However, their comparative efficacy and safety in this specific setting remain uncertain. Our objective was to compare ketamine and pregabalin indirectly for early postoperative opioid consumption, pain, and adverse events in adults undergoing spinal fusion. METHODS: Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Trials were searched from inception through October 2025. Eligible studies were randomized trials enrolling adults undergoing instrumented spinal fusion, randomized to perioperative ketamine, pregabalin, or control, and reported extractable 24-hour opioid consumption or pain outcomes. Continuous outcomes were pooled as mean differences in MME or VAS units, and adverse events were reported descriptively. A connected treatment network was analyzed using random-effects models. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed with the Cochrane RoB 2 tool. RESULTS: Thirteen trials (n=879) were included: ketamine (n=210), pregabalin (n=271), and control (n=398). Six trials contributed opioid data (3 ketamine, 3 pregabalin). Using pregabalin 150 mg as reference, ketamine was associated with lower 0-24-hour opioid use (MD -56.99 mg MME; 95% CI -99.56 to -14.43). Control (MD +21.31; 95% CI -1.05 to +43.66) and pregabalin 300 mg (MD -13.22; 95% CI -40.41 to +13.96) did not significantly differ from pregabalin 150 mg. Seven trials contributed 24-hour VAS data, with control being associated with higher pain versus pregabalin 150 mg (MD +0.84; 95% CI +0.01 to +1.66), while ketamine and pregabalin 300 mg were not k significantly different. Adverse events were generally infrequent and similar to control. CONCLUSIONS: Both ketamine and pregabalin provide early opioid sparing with comparable 24-hour analgesia. Ketamine showed a larger opioid-sparing point estimate, but indirect comparisons are imprecise. Adequately powered head-to-head trials with standardized protocols and adverse event reporting are needed.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Comparison of posterior cellular bonegraft options for single-level lumbar spinal fusion: a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Iliac bone autograft (IBG) is osteoinductive/osteogenic/osteoconductive but requires an additional harvesting procedure with known morbidities. Bone morphogenic protein (BMP) is osteoinductive and effective in obtaining fusion but is used off label for posterior fusion, has multiple side effects, and is expensive. Stem cell bone products, both auto- and allograft are attractive osteoinductive alternatives that avoid morbidity related to the graft donor site and may have a better safety profile than BMP. Morcelized allograft bone is osteoconductive but not osteoinductive or osteogenic. PURPOSE: Evaluate and compare the effectiveness of 6 types of viable or osteoinductive bone graft material in obtaining a solid posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for single level anterior/posterior lumbar spinal fusion. The bone grafts were IBG, BMP, autogenous stem cells (MSC) from concentrated bone marrow aspirate (BMA), allograft MSC from bone marrow, adipose tissue, or amniotic fluid, combined with inert cancellous allograft (Allo). STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Prospective, single-blinded randomized study of 6 cohorts and inert historical control. PATIENT SAMPLE: Elective anterior-posterior lumbar spinal fusion of 175 patients. OUTCOME MEASURES: Assessments included pre and postoperative back and leg pain (VAS) scores, pain drawing, disability (ODI) scores, pain medication usage, and 1-year postoperative thin-cut CT scans (read by blinded radiologists). METHODS: Patients who were surgical candidates for a 1-level anterior/posterior lumbar fusion were randomized to 1 of 6 types of posterior bone graft alternatives: IBG, BMP, BMA, allograft MSC derived from bone marrow combined with morcelized Allo (cAlloBone), adipose derived MSC combined with morcelized Allo (cAlloFat), or amnion derived MSC combined with morcelized Allo (cAlloAm). Historical Allo patients served as a negative control group. Each group (n 27) had prospective outcomes and were followed for a minimum of 2 years. Fusion rate and outcomes were compared and referenced to Allo group. RESULTS: All but 5 patients had a solid ASF. The posterior fusion rates were 98% for IBG, 94% for BMP, 85% for BMA, 67% for cAlloBone, 64% for cAlloFat, 62% for cAlloAm, and 50% for Allo. Outcomes were significantly improved for all measures for all groups and there was no difference between groups except cAlloFat had slightly greater improvement in back pain in the 7-12 month follow-up period. BMP was the most expensive graft material; cellular allografts had a high-cost relative to fusion rate. CONCLUSIONS: For single level ASF/PSF, the PSF fusion rate was significantly greater for IBG and BMP followed by BMA. Various allograft MSC bone graft options resulted in lower fusion rates but may be greater than Allo. Outcomes were uniformly improved regardless of the type of graft used or the fusion status of the posterior fusion as long as the interbody fusion was solid. If bone graft cost savings is a consideration for PSF, then IBG has the greatest radiographic value, and Allo the greatest clinical value as long as the anterior interbody fusion is solid.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Vancomycin Effectiveness in Reducing Surgical Site Infection in Posterior Spinal Fusion Surgery: A Retrospective Data Analysis of the STRIVE Trial.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. OBJECTIVE: To re-evaluate vancomycin as a preventive measure for surgical site infection (SSI). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Intrawound vancomycin powder is used to prevent SSIs in spinal surgery. Prior studies, often limited to single institutions or small samples, have shown mixed efficacy and potential increases in non- S. aureus and Gram-negative infections. We hypothesized that SSIs rates would be similar with and without intrawound vancomycin in posterior spinal fusion (PSF) surgery. METHODS: Prospectively collected data from the 3595 patients in the STaphylococcus aureus suRgical Inpatient Vaccine Efficacy (STRIVE) trial were stratified by intrawound antibiotic usage. Multivariate logistic regression assessed the effect of vancomycin use on SSI, adjusting for patient demographics and SSI-associated risk factors. Secondary outcomes included critical care stay, reoperation, sepsis, and hospital readmission. RESULTS: Of 3311 patients who underwent surgery, 847 (26%) received only intrawound vancomycin and 1534 (46%) received no intrawound antibiotics. Sixty (8%) patients developed postoperative SSI, of whom 20 (33%) had received intrawound vancomycin. Receiving intrawound vancomycin was not associated with SSI incidence versus no intrawound antibiotics [odds ratio (OR): 0.77; 95% CI: 0.42-1.42], critical care stay (OR: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.78-1.12), or sepsis (OR: 2.04; 95% CI: 0.62-6.73). However, intrawound vancomycin was associated with increased odds of hospital readmission (OR: 1.82; 95% CI: 1.28-2.6; P < 0.001) and reoperation (OR: 1.75; 95% CI: 1.18-2.6; P = 0.005). Factors significantly associated with intrawound vancomycin use included intraoperative antibiotic readministration (OR: 2.97; 95% CI: 1.36-6.5; P =0.006) and hospital location, lower odds in Europe (OR: 0.13; 95% CI: 0.06-0.29; P < 0.001) or Asia (OR: 0.02; 95% CI: 0-0.08; P < 0.001) versus North America. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative vancomycin use was not associated with reduced SSI incidence compared with no intrawound antibiotics after PSF surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Humans↗
PubMed1978

Posterior spinal fusion with Harrington instrumentation using "balanced" anesthesia.

In our experience nitrous oxide-oxygen-morphine-curare anesthesia has proved preferable because of the need for swifly awakening patients after instrumentation to ascertain neurologic status. Adjunctively, doxapram has been used to awaken patients in a predictably short time span. To prevent massive blood loss, hypotension has been attained by pentolinium, trimethaphan camsylate, and sodium nitroprusside.

Anesthesia↗
PubMed2026

Efficacy and safety of postoperative chewing gum for gastrointestinal recovery in children undergoing surgery: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Chewing gum may stimulate gut motility through a "sham feeding" mechanism, but evidence in children is limited. We performed an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing chewing gum plus usual care versus usual care alone in patients younger than 18 years undergoing any surgery. We searched five databases through June 2025. Primary outcomes were the time to first flatus, time to first defecation, and postoperative length of stay (LOS). Certainty was assessed with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Ten studies (n&#x2009;=&#x2009;649) were included: abdominal surgery (5), spinal fusion (3), and tonsillectomy (2). Chewing gum may result in little to no difference in the time to first flatus (MD&#x2009;-&#x2009;3.58&#xa0;h, 95% CI&#x2009;-&#x2009;8.08 to 0.91) or first defecation (MD&#x2009;-&#x2009;3.23&#xa0;h, 95% CI&#x2009;-&#x2009;6.63 to 0.18), both with low certainty. LOS evidence was very uncertain (MD&#x2009;-&#x2009;0.18 days, 95% CI&#x2009;-&#x2009;0.70 to 0.33). Subgroup analyses suggested shorter LOS after abdominal surgery (MD&#x2009;-&#x2009;0.60 days, 95% CI&#x2009;-&#x2009;1.99 to 0.79) but not after spinal fusion (MD 0.10 days, 95% CI&#x2009;-&#x2009;0.29 to 0.50; p for interaction&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.0362). The benefits of postoperative chewing gum in children remain uncertain, with potential surgery-specific differences in LOS warranting investigation.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Feasibility and barriers to same-day physical therapy following lumbar fusion surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of same-day (postoperative day 0; POD0) physical therapy (PT) following lumbar fusion and to identify factors associated with failure to participate. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed prospectively collected data from patients undergoing single-level posterior spinal fusion (PSF), with or without anterior (ALIF) or lateral (LLIF) interbody fusion, between January and December 2024 at a single institution. A standardized POD0 PT protocol was implemented for eligible patients. Patients were categorized into two groups: successful POD0 PT (ambulatory on POD0) and unable to participate. Demographic and surgical variables were compared between groups. Reasons for inability to participate were recorded and categorized. RESULTS: Among 129 patients in whom POD0 PT was attempted, 84 (65%) successfully participated, while 45 (35%) were unable. There were no significant differences in age, sex, BMI, ASA class, operative time, estimated blood loss, or surgical approach between groups. Patients who successfully completed POD0 PT had a significantly shorter hospital length of stay compared to those who did not (3.4&#xa0;&#xb1;&#xa0;1.6 vs 5.8&#xa0;&#xb1;&#xa0;2.9&#xa0;days, P&#xa0;<&#xa0;0.001), with no differences in complication rates, discharge disposition, emergency department visits, or reoperation rates. The most common barriers to POD0 PT were postoperative pain, medical issues (e.g., orthostatic hypotension, nausea, dizziness), and anesthesia-related somnolence. Less common factors included postoperative restrictions and logistical issues such as brace availability. CONCLUSIONS: POD0 PT following lumbar fusion is feasible in the majority of patients and is associated with a shorter hospital stay without increased complications. Failure to participate was not associated with the baseline patient or surgical characteristics evaluated in this study. Instead, the most common barriers were postoperative pain, transient medical issues, and anesthesia-related somnolence, suggesting that optimization of modifiable perioperative factors may improve the implementation of POD0 PT.

Humans↗
PubMed1976

[Possibilities of cervical fusion surgery in the spinal canal with intervertebral disk degeneration, Therapeutic and case-report contribution].

This is a report of a patient with pains in the shoulders and arms, atrophies of the small muscles of the hands, and paraspasms of the legs. After having suffered from the disease for eight to nine years, the patient was diagnosed as having cervical myelopathy. Measurements of the bony cervical vertebral column, which were made on a lateral roentgenogram, showed extreme narrowness of the spinal canal, the measured values obtained being below the lower limit. In addition, the cervical canal was narrowed at three levels by the formation of projections on degenerate disks. This suggested the most effective surgical treatment: Vetral clearance of disks, removal of prominences, and fusion of the three levels through the use of four bone dowels. Subsidence of pains in the shoulders and arms, improvements of paresis of the hands, and considerable improvement of paraspams of the legs were observed postoperatively. This particular case shows that surgical intervention may be considered a possible method of therapy even in the case of narrowness of the cervical canal, a condition that was aggravated here by a number of degenerate disks. In such situations it is possible for the cervical canal to be considerably relieved by clearing the disks, removing the projections and crests, and making use of the special technique of fusion or joining together so that improvement will be possible even in those cases where the disease has already arrived at a progressive state.

Cervical Vertebrae↗
PubMed2026

Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion With Lateral Vertebral Screw Fixation Versus Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Severe Lumbar Stenosis: Results of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The benefits of oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) vs transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) in severe lumbar stenosis (Schizas C/D) remain uncertain. This randomized trial compared clinical, radiographic, and safety outcomes of OLIF and TLIF. METHODS: From November 2018 to December 2021, a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial enrolled 260 adults with single-level severe stenosis and instability. In total, 224 patients were randomized to OLIF or TLIF. Prespecified outcomes followed consolidated standards of reporting trials. Primary outcomes were visual analog scale back/leg pain and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), with minimal clinically important difference thresholds of ODI &#x2265;12-13 points or &#x2265;30% improvement, and visual analog scale &#x2265;1.5-2.0 points. Radiographic measures included disc height, lumbar and segmental lordosis, and canal cross-sectional area (CSA). Complications were recorded. Ethics approval was obtained from the institutional review board, the trial was registered with ISRCTN.com , and all patients provided written informed consent. RESULTS: In total, 224 patients were randomized, 5 were lost to follow-up (TLIF n = 2, OLIF n = 3). Baseline features were comparable. OLIF was associated with shorter operative time, less blood loss, earlier ambulation, and shorter hospital stay (all P < .05). Both groups achieved significant, clinically meaningful improvements. OLIF showed greater back pain reduction at 3-6 months and 2 years ( P < .05) and superior ODI improvement at 3 and 6 months ( P < .001), although long-term ODI scores were similar. Radiographically, OLIF provided greater restoration of disc height and segmental lordosis (all P < .001) and demonstrated progressive CSA increase (dynamic decompression), whereas TLIF achieved immediate, sustained CSA enlargement. Fusion rates were comparable at 1-2 years. Complication rates were low and similar (7.3% TLIF vs 5.5% OLIF), with most OLIF-specific events transient. CONCLUSION: Both OLIF and TLIF yield improvements in severe lumbar stenosis. OLIF offers perioperative advantages, earlier functional recovery, radiographic restoration, and dynamic canal remodeling, supporting its role as an equivalent alternative for lumbar spinal stenosis with some secondary advantages.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Liposomal bupivacaine versus ropivacaine for surgical site infiltration in lumbar fusion: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Effective postoperative pain control after lumbar spine surgery remains challenging, and excessive opioid use is associated with adverse outcomes. Evidence comparing liposomal bupivacaine (LB) with conventional long-acting local anesthetics in spine surgery is limited. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this single-center, prospective, randomized, patient- and outcome assessor-blinded trial, adult undergoing one- or two-level posterior lumbar decompression and fusion were assigned (1:1) to surgical site infiltration with either LB (266&#x2009;mg) plus 25&#x2009;mg plain bupivacaine (LB group) or ropivacaine (R group). The primary outcome was 72&#x2009;h cumulative opioid consumption (morphine milligram equivalents, MME). Secondary outcomes included time-profile opioid consumption, pain scores, rescue analgesia, safety, and functional recovery. RESULTS: A total of 202 patients were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. Cumulative MME within 72&#x2009;h was significantly lower in the LB group compared with the R group [43.0 (37.0, 58.0) mg vs. 58.0 (46.0, 73.0) mg], corresponding to a 22% relative reduction (GMR 0.78, 95% CI 0.71-0.85; p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.001). The reduction was most pronounced during 8-24&#x2009;h and 24-48&#x2009;h postoperatively. Overall pain scores at rest and with movement, as well as 72-h pain AUC, were lower in the LB group. No significant between-group differences were observed in rescue analgesia, adverse events and functional recovery. CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing one- or two-level posterior lumbar decompression and fusion, surgical site infiltration with an LB-based combined regimen, compared with ropivacaine monotherapy, reduced 72-h opioid consumption and cumulative postoperative pain burden without an observed increase in adverse events or impairment of early functional recovery.

Humans↗
PubMed1975

Results of treatment of spinal tuberculosis by "middle-path" regime.

The efficacy of modern drugs in the treatment of tuberculosis of the spine has been evaluated by a personal follow-up for three to ten years. Operation on the vertebral lesion was done only for those patients with or without neural complications who failed to respond favourably to drug therapy and rest. Thus absolute indications for operation were present in only 6 per cent of cases without neural involvement and in 60 per cent of patients with neural deficit. Of patients who responded to drug therapy alone, only 19 per cent revealed increase of kyphosis by more than 10 degrees. The diseased area showed radiological evidence of osseous replacement of 29-6 per cent of cases, of fibro-osseous union in 50 per cent and of fibrous replacement in 20-2 per cent. The overall results of this regime compare favourably with those of radical operation. It is suggested that treatment should in the first place be by modern antitubercular drugs.

Abscess↗
PubMed2026

Efficacy and safety of Vertebral Body Sliding Osteotomy (VBSO) versus Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion (ACCF): A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) is an established treatment for complex cervical myelopathy and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL), yet it carries risks of dural injury and graft-related failure. Vertebral body sliding osteotomy (VBSO) is a novel technique that avoids direct OPLL manipulation by translating the vertebral body anteriorly to enlarge the spinal canal. Although early studies suggest VBSO may reduce complications, evidence remains limited to retrospective cohorts from the technique's developers, with no high-level synthesis directly comparing it to ACCF. We therefore conducted this meta-analysis to compare clinical outcomes, complications, and radiographic parameters between VBSO and ACCF, while critically evaluating the certainty of the evidence and its generalizability. A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science (through June 2025) identified four retrospective cohort studies (449 patients; VBSO n&#x2009;=&#x2009;209, ACCF n&#x2009;=&#x2009;240). A critical limitation of the included evidence is that all studies originated from a single institution (Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea) with overlapping enrollment periods (2006-2020), increasing the risk of duplicate patient cohorts. Furthermore, the first author (D.-H. Lee) is the same across all included studies, introducing substantial surgeon-expertise bias. Outcomes included neurological recovery, functional outcomes, complications, and radiographic parameters. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. Neurological recovery and functional outcomes were comparable between groups. ACCF showed slightly higher postoperative JOA scores (MD -0.59, 95% CI -0.96 to -0.22; p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.01), though the clinical relevance is uncertain. VBSO was associated with reduced risks of graft subsidence (RR 0.23; p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.01), pseudarthrosis (RR 0.25; p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.01), revision surgery (RR 0.17; p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.01), and neurological deterioration (RR 0.17; p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.02). CSF leakage appeared to be less frequent with VBSO, but the difference was not statistically significant. VBSO was also associated with greater postoperative cervical lordosis and shorter hospital stays. However, these findings must be interpreted with extreme caution: leave-one-out sensitivity analyses revealed that the results for postoperative JOA score, neurological deterioration, and pseudarthrosis were fragile and driven by a single large study, meaning these apparent advantages may not be robust. In addition, GRADE assessment revealed very low certainty across all assessed outcomes. Given the very low certainty of evidence, the preliminary nature of the available data, the fragility of several key findings, and the critical limitations of the underlying studies (single institution, overlapping patient cohorts, developer bias, and systematic imbalance in follow-up duration), the observed differences should be considered hypothesis-generating rather than definitive. VBSO should not be considered a proven superior alternative to ACCF based on the current evidence. Prospective, multicenter, international studies with balanced follow-up durations conducted by independent surgical teams are required before broader adoption can be recommended.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Safety and Stability of a Combined C2 Screw Placement Strategy With Vertebral Artery Mobilization.

BACKGROUND: Although C2 pedicle screws are considered the gold standard for atlantoaxial fixation, the optimal fixation strategy for patients with high-riding vertebral arteries (HRVA) or narrow C2 pedicles (NC2P) remains controversial because of the increased risk of vertebral artery injury and the limitations of alternative fixation techniques. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety, stability, and clinical efficacy of an individualized C2 screw fixation strategy incorporating vertebral artery mobilization for complex upper cervical anatomy. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted in 312 patients who underwent C2 fixation between 2017 and 2025. Patients were categorized according to fusion method, screw laterality, and VA transposition requirement. Bone fusion rates and screw accuracy (Gertzbein-Robbins grading) were compared across groups using &#x3c7;2, Fisher's exact, and multivariate logistic regression analyses to control confounders. RESULTS: All procedures were successfully completed without permanent neurovascular injury. At 6&#x2009;months, the fusion rate with an atlantoaxial fusion cage was significantly higher than with interlaminar bone grafting (92.3% vs. 51.0%, p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.001). Unilateral C2 pedicle screw fixation combined with a contralateral alternative screw achieved comparable stability to bilateral fixation (p&#x2009;>&#x2009;0.05). Screw placement accuracy was 100% clinically acceptable in normal anatomy and 60% in cases requiring VA mobilization, with no VA injury or blood flow compromise. CONCLUSION: The proposed multi-strategy C2 screw placement protocol-integrating fusion cage support and VA mobilization-achieves superior fusion, reliable fixation, and high safety, even in anatomically challenging conditions. This approach provides a reproducible and versatile solution for C2 instrumentation in complex craniovertebral junction surgery.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

The radiographic effect of cage subsidence on neuroforamina after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective Cohort Study. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to investigate the effect of cage subsidence on neuroforaminal area after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) utilizing computed tomography (CT). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Restoration of disc height via implantation of an interbody device provides an indirect decompression of the cervical neuroforamina. Interbody cage subsidence is a potential postoperative occurrence, but the effect of this on neuroforaminal area has yet to be characterized. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of patients who underwent one- to four-levels of ACDF utilizing an interbody device with anterior plating. Cage subsidence, neuroforaminal area, height and width were measured on CT scans preoperatively and at least 6&#xa0;months postoperatively. Levels with a cumulative sum of cranial and caudal subsidence greater than 4&#xa0;mm were classified as severely subsided, while levels with cumulative subsidence less than 4&#xa0;mm were classified as non-severely subsided. RESULTS: A total of 83 patients (151 levels) were included in this retrospective analysis. Average endplate subsidence was 3.2&#xa0;&#xb1;&#xa0;1.9&#xa0;mm. Non-severely subsided levels demonstrated a greater perioperative increase in neuroforaminal area (7.9 vs 2.1&#xa0;mm2, p&#xa0;<&#xa0;0.001), neuroforaminal height (1.1 vs 0.4&#xa0;mm, p&#xa0;<&#xa0;0.001) and neuroforaminal width (0.7 vs 0.1&#xa0;mm, p&#xa0;<&#xa0;0.001) compared to severely subsided levels. Interbody subsidence significantly predicted a decreased change in neuroforaminal height, width and area (p&#xa0;<&#xa0;0.001). Severe subsidence was associated with an increased rate of pseudarthrosis, but similar reoperation rates and recurrent neurologic deficits between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Severe subsidence of interbody cages after an ACDF was associated with a decreased perioperative change in neuroforaminal dimensions. This decrease in the size of the neuroforamen may reduce the effect of indirect decompression of the nerve root.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Postoperative Curvature Loss in Three-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion With Zero-Profile Device.

PURPOSE: Cervical curvature loss is a frequent complication following 3-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using a Zero-Profile device. Consequently, the capacity of this device to maintain cervical sagittal alignment in 3-level ACDF remains highly controversial. This study aimed to identify potential predictors for postoperative curvature loss (PCL) and evaluate its impact on clinical outcomes. METHODS: A total of 113 patients who underwent ACDF for 3-level cervical degenerative disc disease (CDDD) between January 2021 and December 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic data, radiological parameters, and clinical outcomes were analyzed. Radiographic measures included cervical curvature, T1 slope, C2-7 sagittal vertical axis, and titanium plate and endplate (TPE) distance. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Neck Disability Index (NDI), and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores. Statistical analyses were performed using paired and independent t-tests, as well as Pearson correlation coefficients. RESULTS: The average curvature loss was 6.82&#xb0; from 1&#x2009;week postoperatively to the final follow-up (p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.001). However, the final curvature (11.65&#xb0;) was maintained, representing a 4.33&#xb0; improvement compared to preoperative values. Significant correlations were observed between PCL and preoperative curvature (r&#x2009;=&#x2009;-0.368, p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.013), preoperative T1 slope (r&#x2009;=&#x2009;-0.546, p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.001), &#x2206;T1 slope (r&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.443, p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.002), and &#x2206;TPE distance (r&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.417, p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.004). PCL did not correlate with Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores or arm VAS scores at the final follow-up. Nevertheless, patients with a PCL&#x2009;&#x2265;&#x2009;6&#xb0; exhibited significantly higher neck VAS (p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.028) and NDI scores (p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.041). CONCLUSION: Although contiguous 3-level ACDF with a Zero-Profile device may result in PCL, it preserves an improved cervical lordosis compared to the preoperative baseline. Low preoperative curvature and a low preoperative T1 slope are potentially predictive factors for PCL. Postoperative changes in TPE distance and T1 slope are significantly associated with PCL, suggesting a potential biomechanical link that requires direct validation. Furthermore, PCL may lead to higher neck VAS and NDI scores. Consequently, the Zero-Profile device may require careful consideration in 3-level CDDD patients presenting with low preoperative curvature and a low T1 slope. Importantly, the 6&#xb0; PCL threshold identified is preliminary and requires prospective validation before clinical application.

Humans↗