PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “surrogate markers of active viral replication”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Viral viability markers of SARS-CoV-2: a comparison of cell culture, genomic RNA RT-PCR, and subgenomic RNA RT-PCR.

UNLABELLED: Accurate methods to assess viral viability are crucial for determining isolation duration and antiviral therapy in immunocompromised patients. Although cell culture (CC) is the gold standard, it has limitations. Cycle threshold (Ct) values from genomic RNA (gRNA) RT-PCR and subgenomic RNA (sgRNA) RT-PCR have been proposed as markers of active viral replication. This study evaluated the correlation between CC, gRNA Ct values, and sgRNA to identify the best viral viability marker. This study aimed to evaluate the correlation between CC, gRNA Ct values, and sgRNA to identify the best viral viability marker. We conducted a prospective study on immunocompromised patients with suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection at a tertiary hospital (May 2021 to May 2023). Nasopharyngeal swabs were inoculated into Vero E6 cells and tested for gRNA using RT-PCR (Cobas 6800, Roche) and for sgRNA (non-commercial RT-PCR). The sensitivity (S), specificity (SP), positive (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy were calculated using CC as the gold standard. Among 285 samples from 108 patients, gRNA RT-PCR had high S and NPV (1.0) but low SP (0.24) and moderate PPV (0.63). Ct analysis improved performance in extreme but not intermediate values. A Ct ≤ 30 maximized S but had low SP; Ct ≤ 25 yielded S (0.88), SP (0.89), PPV (0.92), NPV (0.84), and accuracy (0.88); sgRNA showed the highest S (0.99), SP (0.96), PPV (0.97), NPV (0.99), and accuracy (0.98). sgRNA detection is the best marker for identifying viable SARS-CoV-2, aiding decisions on isolation, antiviral treatment, or delaying chemotherapy in immunocompromised patients. IMPORTANCE: Identifying whether a patient still has contagious SARS-CoV-2 is essential for managing isolation, antiviral treatment, and other clinical decisions-especially in immunocompromised individuals. While viral culture is the gold standard for confirming viral viability, it is slow, expensive, and not widely available. Many hospitals rely on RT-PCR tests, but these detect viral genetic material whether or not the virus is still active. This study shows that detecting subgenomic RNA (sgRNA), a molecule only present when the virus is actively replicating, is a highly accurate way, a molecule only present when the virus is actively replicating, is a highly accurate way to determine whether the virus is still viable. Compared to standard PCR or viral culture, sgRNA testing better predicts who is truly infectious. These findings support sgRNA as a useful tool to guide clinical management and infection control in vulnerable patients.

Humans↗

Hepatitis B e antigen and the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The presence of hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) in serum indicates active viral replication in hepatocytes. HBeAg is thus a surrogate marker for the presence of hepatitis B virus DNA. We conducted a prospective study to determine the relation between positivity for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and HBeAg and the development of hepatocellular carcinoma. METHODS: In 1991 and 1992, we enrolled 11,893 men without evidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (age range, 30 to 65 years) from seven townships in Taiwan. Serum samples obtained at the time of enrollment were tested for HBsAg and HBeAg by radioimmunoassay. The diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma was ascertained through data linkage with the computerized National Cancer Registry in Taiwan and with death certificates. We performed a multiple regression analysis to determine the relative risk of hepatocellular carcinoma among men who were positive for HBsAg alone or for HBsAg and HBeAg, as compared with those who were negative for both. RESULTS: There were 111 cases of newly diagnosed hepatocellular carcinoma during 92,359 person-years of follow-up. The incidence rate of hepatocellular carcinoma was 1169 cases per 100,000 person-years among men who were positive for both HBsAg and HBeAg, 324 per 100,000 person-years for those who were positive for HBsAg only, and 39 per 100,000 person-years for those who were negative for both. After adjustment for age, sex, the presence or absence of antibodies against hepatitis C virus, cigarette-smoking status, and use or nonuse of alcohol, the relative risk of hepatocellular carcinoma was 9.6 (95 percent confidence interval, 6.0 to 15.2) among men who were positive for HBsAg alone and 60.2 (95 percent confidence interval, 35.5 to 102.1) among those who were positive for both HBsAg and HBeAg, as compared with men who were negative for both. CONCLUSIONS: Positivity for HBeAg is associated with an increased risk of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Adult↗

Delavirdine mesylate, a potent non-nucleoside HIV-1 reverse transcriptase inhibitor.

In summary, DLV has been well-tolerated in > 1,000 HIV-1 infected patients. Skin rash is the most prevalent medical event associated with DLV therapy. The rash can be successfully dosed through or rechallenged in > 85% of patients. The pharmacokinetics are non-linear as DLV is metabolized primarily by cytochrome P4503A in the liver. Serum levels of DLV +/- 10 microM can easily be achieved in most HIV-1 patients, which are 100 fold above the in vitro IC90 activity. In clinical trials, DLV inhibits viral replication as demonstrated by positive surrogate marker responses (CD4 counts, P24 antigen concentration, PMBC and plasma virus titers, and plasma HIV RNA concentration). Susceptibility of HIV-1 strains to DLV decrease over time in a majority of subjects in which virus can be cultured. However, HIV strains from about 80% of subjects had a DLV IC50 < 10 microM (the trough DLV concentration in plasma) throughout the Upjohn trial. In HIV strains from about 20% of subjects, susceptibility to DLV remained unchanged in the first 8 months of DLV combination therapy, or HIV-1 was not recovered at all or most timepoints. In contrast, development of resistance to nevirapine or L-697,661 monotherapy or combination therapy with ZDV has occurred in the first eight weeks of therapy. The most common genotypic mutations seen to date are K103N and P236L. The clinical significance of the phenotypic, genotypic and surrogate marker changes associated with DLV remain to be elucidated. The surrogate marker responses in clinical trials suggest that DLV has clinical synergy with ZDV +/- ddI as evidenced by a better and more sustained surrogate marker response when a subject is sensitive to or naive to the nucleoside RTI combined with DLV. Future therapy with DLV will likely be in combination with one or more nucleoside or non-nucleoside RTIs, protease inhibitors and/or immunomodulatory agents.

Antiviral Agents↗

Hepatitis B virus genome mutations in precore and basal core promoter regions among HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B patients with high viral load in Indonesia.

Hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) is widely used as a marker for active HBV replication and serves as a surrogate for HBV DNA&#x2009;>&#x2009;200,000 IU/mL to determine eligibility for tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) prophylaxis to prevent vertical transmission, according to WHO guidelines. However, some HBeAg-negative patients still harbor high viral loads. Mutations in the precore (PC) and basal core promoter (BCP) regions may reduce or abolish HBeAg expression without necessarily suppressing viral replication. Next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based characterization of these mutations remains limited in Indonesia. This study aimed to analyze the mutation prevalence in the BCP and PC regions associated with HBeAg negativity in Indonesian patients. We conducted a cross-sectional study of 32 chronic HBV treatment-na&#xef;ve, unvaccinated patients with HBV DNA&#x2009;>&#x2009;200,000 IU/mL (16 HBeAg-negative, 16 HBeAg-positive) at Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital. BCP and PC mutations were analyzed using NGS, classifying mutations as major (mutation frequency index [MFI] &#x2265;20%) or minor (MFI 1-&#x2009;<&#x2009;20%). Associations were analyzed using the Chi-square or Fisher's exact test and p-values were adjusted using the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure. Among 29 major mutation sites, PC mutations A1846T/C and G1896A were more frequent in HBeAg-negative than HBeAg-positive patients (81.3% vs 6.3% and 75.0% vs 12.5%, respectively; all adjusted p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.019). Combined analysis showed higher mutation frequencies in HBeAg-negative patients (93.8%, 81.3%, and 62.5% for A1846T/C, G1896A, and G1899A, respectively; all adjusted p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.015). In conclusion, HBeAg-negative patients with high viral loads are strongly associated with PC mutations, particularly G1896A, A1846T/C, and G1899A. These exploratory findings provide regional NGS-based molecular evidence that established PC mutations may contribute to the coexistence of HBeAg negativity and continued high-level HBV replication in Indonesian patients. Larger studies incorporating broader virological and clinical comparison groups are required to determine the clinical significance of these findings.

Humans↗

HIV replication elicits little cytopathic effects in vivo: analysis of surrogate markers for virus production, cytotoxic T cell response and infected cell death.

Several potential mechanisms for viral destruction of HIV-infected cells have been described. The hypothesis was examined that if HIV were cytopathic, a positive relation between the in vivo virus production or CTL activity and infected cell death should be observed. In a regression analysis no significant relation was found between surrogate markers for in vivo virus production or the virus-specific CTL response and death rates of productively infected cells. In a subgroup of patients the hypothesis is rejected that HIV replication elicits a large (R(2) > 0.25) cytopathic effect (P < 0.05, N = 36). It is concluded that HIV replication elicits little cytopathic effect in productively infected cells and that CD4(+) T lymphocytes are eroded by other mechanisms.

CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes↗

Intrinsic stability of episomal circles formed during human immunodeficiency virus type 1 replication.

The development of surrogate markers capable of detecting residual ongoing human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) replication in patients receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy is an important step in understanding viral dynamics and in developing new treatment strategies. In this study, we evaluated the utility of circular forms of the viral genome for the detection of recent infection of cells by HIV-1. We measured the fate of both one-long terminal repeat (1-LTR) and 2-LTR circles following in vitro infection of logarithmically growing CD4+ T cells under conditions in which cell death was not a significant contributing factor. Circular forms of the viral genome were found to be highly stable and to decrease in concentration only as a function of dilution resulting from cell division. We conclude that these DNA circles are not intrinsically unstable in all cell types and suggest that the utility of 2-LTR circle assays in measuring recent HIV-1 infection of susceptible cells in vivo needs to be reevaluated.

CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes↗

Didanosine. A review of its antiviral activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic potential in human immunodeficiency virus infection.

Didanosine is a dideoxynucleoside analogue which undergoes intracellular conversion to the putative active triphosphate metabolite. The active metabolite appears to inhibit viral reverse transcriptase and terminate the proviral DNA, and produces virustatic inhibition of actively replicating human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) at clinically relevant concentrations. In phase I studies didanosine had beneficial effects on various surrogate markers of clinical efficacy and also improved clinical manifestations of HIV infection, with a 21-month survival rate of 80% in patients with acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) and 93% in patients with AIDS-related complex (ARC) in 1 study. Didanosine also improved CD4+ cell counts in a phase II/III trial in patients previously treated with zidovudine, whereas cell counts declined in patients continuing zidovudine therapy. However, the effects of didanosine on clinical end-points (disease progression, survival, HIV encephalopathy) remain to be established. Peripheral neuropathy and pancreatitis are the predominant dose-limiting adverse events and didanosine therapy should be withdrawn in patients developing signs or symptoms of pancreatitis and during acute treatment of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia. However, at currently recommended clinical dosages didanosine is generally well tolerated with minimal haematological toxicity. Thus, in a therapeutic area with few treatment options, didanosine offers a welcome alternative for patients intolerant of, or resistant to, zidovudine. There are a number of clinical trials in progress evaluating didanosine alone or in combination with other antiviral agents, and these results are awaited with considerable interest.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗

Evolving understanding of the immunopathogenesis of HIV.

Understanding of the immunopathogenesis of HIV infection is becoming more advanced as the activity of HIV infection in lymph nodes is appreciated and as improved virological measures permit more accurate quantitation of viral burden in patients at all stages of HIV disease. Although CD4+ cell counts remain important prognostic indicators, their role as a surrogate for direct antiviral activity has been questioned and increasing focus has been placed on more direct quantitative viral measures that are now available. After an initial explosive burst of viral replication during acute seroconversion that is downregulated by the immune system, these newer markers have revealed that viral replication is ongoing during the so-called "clinically latent" period of HIV infection. One of the most active sites of viral replication during this asymptomatic period is in lymphoid tissues. Over time, however, immunological control of HIV wanes, the site of replication shifts from the lymph nodes to other lymphoid organs, and disease progression ensues. The role of viral diversity in late-stage HIV disease is now well established, yet its role in pathogenesis and establishment of viruses resistant to antiviral agents is not fully established. Increased understanding of how HIV causes immune dysfunction may help us control direct and indirect (opportunistic) complications of HIV infection.

CD4 Lymphocyte Count↗

10th International Conference on Gene Therapy of Cancer. 13-15 December, 2001, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, San Diego, CA, USA.

This annual meeting highlighted some incremental advances in the development of gene therapeutics, with genetic prodrug activation, novel tumor suppressor genes and replicating viral vectors at the leading edge for clinical application. Imaging technologies are proving to be very useful for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies in preclinical models and should be translated into systems that can help in the development of surrogate markers in clinical trials.

Animals↗

Early versus delayed treatment of HIV infection. Zidovudine should be given before symptoms develop.

An understanding of the virology and pathogenesis of HIV infection provides a rationale for initiating early intervention with antiretroviral drugs. Even at the earliest stages of infection when HIV-infected patients are asymptomatic, viral replication is ongoing, particularly in lymphoid tissues. Initiation of antiretroviral therapy can reduce viral replication and delay disease progression. A possible objection to early intervention therapy with zidovudine is the risk of selecting out resistant isolates of HIV, which would be difficult to treat. In practice, zidovudine-resistant isolates occur significantly less frequently in patients with early-stage disease compared with those with late-stage HIV infection, thus supporting the early use of zidovudine; in addition, alternative therapies, active against zidovudine-resistant isolates, are available. Clinical trials with zidovudine in asymptomatic patients have differed in terms of length of follow-up, patient inclusion criteria, dosages and end-points. However, a number of conclusions are possible based on the results obtained: early intervention delays the progression of AIDS, delays the onset of symptomatic disease, has a favourable effect on surrogate markers of HIV infection and is well tolerated; it does not, however, seem to produce any benefit in terms of survival. It is this last point that has given rise to much of the controversy regarding early intervention with zidovudine in asymptomatic patients. Since the disease is progressive in nature with persistent and high levels of viral replication and as prolonging the period of relative health and quality of life when the patient is asymptomatic is desirable, the choice to treat before symptoms develop would appear to be the optimal therapeutic strategy.

CD4 Lymphocyte Count↗

Treatment of chronic hepatitis C with interferon: how long should a lasting response last if a lasting response could last?

In chronic hepatitis C infection to document spontaneous remission or response to treatment, more than one parameter is required. Both the activity of liver disease and of viral replication need to be recorded. The former is most accurately done by liver biopsy. The number of such biopsies which a patient or physician are willing to have performed is necessarily limited, such that serum-ALT has traditionally been used as surrogate marker. Viral replication can be quantified using a standardized and validated polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test system. Drawing on a database of over 2300 patients with documented chronic hepatitis C for whom data were recorded longitudinally for up to 5 years, a proposal is presented on how to document more precisely quality of response and its duration. Using both biochemical and virological parameters quantified repeatedly at regular intervals, three response patterns can be described, and less frequent histological assessments are used for confirmation: non-response, where no relevant changes are seen in either parameter; transient response that consists of a response induction, usually biochemical in nature, accompanied by a transient decrease in viral replication only. This response is subsequently lost either during (breakthrough) or after the end of treatment (relapse); finally, a durable response is defined by a rapid return to normal or fall to undetectable levels, as a rule within 2 weeks to 3 months, of serum ALT and hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA that is sustained until the end of the follow-up period (up to 5 years).

Alanine Transaminase↗

Zidovudine: a review of its use in the management of vertically-acquired pediatric HIV infection.

UNLABELLED: Zidovudine is a thymidine analog that, after intracellular phosphorylation to zidovudine triphosphate metabolite, inhibits HIV-specific reverse transcriptase and terminates proviral DNA. Zidovudine administered to mildly symptomatic women with HIV infection in the antepartum (100mg orally 5 times/day), intrapartum (2 mg/kg intravenously over 1 hour then 1 mg/kg/h) and then to the neonate for 6 weeks (2 mg/kg), significantly reduced the rate of vertical HIV transmission by about two thirds, in the absence of breast-feeding (The Pediatric AIDS Clinical Trials Group 076 trial, standard protocol). Shorter zidovudine regimens, reduced the risk of transmission of HIV by 50% in a non-breast-feeding population and by about 37% in breast-feeding populations. Zidovudine (standard protocol) in combination with lamivudine was superior to zidovudine alone. A short oral zidovudine regimen was not as effective as a two-dose oral nevirapine regime, although the combination of short-course zidovudine plus lamivudine was as effective. Suppression of viral replication in neonates, infants and children has been achieved with zidovudine when used in triple-therapy regimens that include other antiviral drugs. Results from a trial of treatment-naive children indicate that the antiviral efficacy of combinations of zidovudine and lamivudine or abacavir, given with the protease inhibitor nelfinavir, is superior to treatment with this combination minus nelfinavir. When zidovudine was used in other highly active antiretroviral therapy regimens significant improvements in surrogate markers were consistently seen. Changing to ritonavir-containing regimens was superior to changing to treatment with two new nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Short- and long-term (up to 5.6 years) outcomes from clinical trials showed that prenatal and neonatal exposure to zidovudine was generally well tolerated with the exception of mild anemia that resolved spontaneously after treatment cessation. Zidovudine was generally well tolerated as monotherapy in clinical trials of pediatric patients with HIV infection, and adverse events were similar to those reported in adults, with anemia and neutropenia being the most common. CONCLUSION: Zidovudine, as monotherapy or in combination with other antiretroviral agents, remains a first-choice therapy for the prophylaxis of mother-to-child HIV transmission as shown by substantial reductions in transmission rates. Where feasible, the optimal strategy to prevent vertical transmission is to combine drug therapy with Cesarean section delivery and no breast-feeding. In addition, zidovudine in combination with another nucleoside analogue and a protease inhibitor is a first- or second-choice therapy for the treatment of pediatric HIV infection as significant and sustained reductions in viral load have been shown in both plasma and cerebrospinal fluid.

Adolescent↗

Changes of lymphocyte apoptosis associated with sequential introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) on surrogate markers of lymphocyte apoptosis in HIV 1-infected individuals. METHODS: Ex vivo apoptosis was studied prospectively in 26 antiretroviral naive HIV-positive patients up to 12 weeks after sequential initiation of HAART [phase I: nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI), phase II: NRTI + protease inhibitor (PI)]. Apoptosis was assessed via CD95-, Apo2.7-expression and annexin-V-binding in peripheral CD4, CD8, B and NK-cells, and compared to changes in activation markers (HLA-DR, CD38) and viral loads. RESULTS: After introduction of HAART CD4-counts rose significantly mainly through cell redistribution, while activation markers decreased. Although Apo2.7 expression decreased throughout the study period, it was not possible to establish a correlation to the rise in CD4 cells. Unexpectedly, CD95 expression and annexin V binding were elevated during phase I of treatment without PI and began to decline only after the addition of a PI in phase II. Poor responders to antiretroviral therapy had significantly higher CD95 expression and annexin V binding in the initial phase of antiretroviral regimen. CONCLUSION: These data show divergent effects of HAART on surrogate markers of apoptosis, when treatment is initiated sequentially with NRTIs first. Partial suppression of HIV replication during treatment without PI may be associated with increased rates of apoptosis.

ADP-ribosyl Cyclase↗

Cathelicidin deficiency predisposes to eczema herpeticum.

BACKGROUND: The cathelicidin family of antimicrobial peptides is an integral component of the innate immune response that exhibits activity against bacterial, fungal, and viral pathogens. Eczema herpeticum (ADEH) develops in a subset of patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) because of disseminated infection with herpes simplex virus (HSV). OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the potential role of cathelicidins in host susceptibility to HSV infection. METHODS: Glycoprotein D was measured by means of real-time RT-PCR as a marker of HSV replication in skin biopsy specimens and human keratinocyte cultures. Cathelicidin expression was evaluated in skin biopsy specimens from patients with AD (n = 10) without a history of HSV skin infection and from patients with ADEH (n = 10). RESULTS: The cathelicidin peptide LL-37 (human cathelicidin) exhibited activity against HSV in an antiviral assay, with significant killing (P < .001) within the physiologic range. The importance of cathelicidins in antiviral skin host defense was confirmed by the observation of higher levels of HSV-2 replication in cathelicidin-deficient (Cnlp-/-) mouse skin (2.6 +/- 0.5 pg HSV/pg GAPDH, P < .05) compared with that seen in skin from their wild-type counterparts (0.9 +/- 0.3). Skin from patients with ADEH exhibited significantly (P < .05) lower levels of cathelicidin protein expression than skin from patients with AD. We also found a significant inverse correlation between cathelicidin expression and serum IgE levels (r2 = 0.46, P < .05) in patients with AD and patients with ADEH. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that the cathelicidin peptide LL-37 possesses antiviral activity against HSV and demonstrates the importance of variable skin expression of cathelicidins in controlling susceptibility to ADEH. Additionally, serum IgE levels might be a surrogate marker for innate immune function and serve as a biomarker for which patients with AD are susceptible to ADEH. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: A deficiency of LL-37 might render patients with AD susceptible to ADEH. Therefore increasing production of skin LL-37 might prevent herpes infection in patients with AD.

Adult↗

Lamivudine. A review of its antiviral activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy in the management of HIV infection.

Lamivudine is a dideoxynucleoside analogue which undergoes intracellular phosphorylation to the putative active metabolite, lamivudine triphosphate. Lamivudine triphosphate prevents HIV replication by competitively inhibiting viral reverse transcriptase. Lamivudine has a unique resistance profile and has the ability to delay resistance to zidovudine and restore zidovudine sensitivity in zidovudine-experienced patients. Combination antiretroviral drug therapy is now generally considered preferable to monotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with HIV infection. In double-blind trials in antiretroviral drug-experienced or -naive adults, improvements in surrogate markers of disease progression were significantly greater in patients receiving lamivudine plus zidovudine combination therapy than in patients who received either drug as monotherapy. Preliminary results of CAESAR, a large multicentre trial in patients with moderately advanced HIV infection receiving zidovudine-based treatment regimens, show a 54% reduction in the rate of disease progression or death with the addition of lamivudine, compared with the addition of placebo. Initial virological data from studies of combination regimens including lamivudine and protease inhibitors are also promising, although the longer term efficacy of these regimens remains to be established. Improvements in surrogate disease markers were also seen in children and adolescents with symptomatic HIV infection who received lamivudine monotherapy. Studies of lamivudine-containing combination therapy in children and adolescents are in progress, but few data have yet been published. Lamivudine is generally well tolerated as monotherapy or in combination with other antiretroviral agents in HIV-infected adults with CD4+ counts > or = 100 cells/microliter. Gastrointestinal disturbances were reported as the most common adverse events during lamivudine monotherapy or combination therapy. Lamivudine appears to be less well tolerated in patients with advanced disease (CD4+ cell counts < 100 cells/microliter), but more data are required to clarify its tolerability in such patients. Pancreatitis has been reported in children with advanced disease during treatment with the drug, but was not directly attributable to lamivudine therapy. Thus, lamivudine, administered in combination with zidovudine, is now established as an effective agent for the treatment of antiretroviral drug-experienced or -naive individuals with asymptomatic or symptomatic HIV disease. Moreover, encouraging preliminary data suggest that lamivudine is poised to become an important component of other regimens, in combination with drugs such as the protease inhibitors.

Adult↗

(B3) Markers of immunodeficiency and mechanisms of HAART therapy on oral lesions.

Highly active anti-retroviral therapy (HAART) has revolutionized the treatment and prognosis of HIV disease and AIDS in those who can take advantage of the treatment. There are currently 20 different anti-retroviral drugs in 4 different classes that are used in specific combinations. Suppression of HIV replication and immune reconstitution are goals of therapy. Since the prevalence of some easily detectable oral manifestations of HIV/AIDS (OMHIV/AIDS) decreases with HAART, it has been suggested that they might be clinically useful surrogate markers of HAART efficacy and immune status. This might be particularly useful if their recurrence presaged or accompanied HAART failure. To date, there has been little work in this area, but its potential value to the clinical management of HIV/AIDS is apparent, especially if frequent measures of viral load and CD4 cell counts are not readily available. However, the usefulness of OMHIV/AIDS as signals for HAART failure is complicated by three phenomena: the immune reconstitution syndrome, the similarity of some adverse reactions of HAART to OMHIV/AIDS, and the direct inhibitory effect of HAART medications on some OMHIV/AIDS (e.g., inhibition of oral candidosis by protease inhibitors). This workshop considered the current evidence and proposed pertinent research questions.

Anti-HIV Agents↗

Zalcitabine. An update of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and clinical efficacy in the management of HIV infection.

Zalcitabine is a dideoxynucleoside antiretroviral agent that is phosphorylated to the active metabolite 2',3'-dideoxycytidine 5'-triphosphate (ddCTP) within both uninfected and HIV-infected cells. At therapeutic concentrations, ddCTP inhibits HIV replication by inhibiting the enzyme reverse transcriptase and terminating elongation of the proviral DNA chain. The results of 3 large pivotal trials comparing zidovudine monotherapy with combination therapy have now clearly established that zalcitabine plus zidovudine combination with an improvement in viral load and CD4+ cell count compared with zidovudine monotherapy. More recently, clinical end-point and surrogate marker data have established the efficacy of zalcitabine in combination with the protease inhibitor saquinavir in zidovudine-experienced patients. Other studies have demonstrated the utility of zalcitabine in combination with ritonavir and the nucleoside analogue lamivudine. Importantly, early use of zalcitabine in the treatment sequence does not appear to limit the therapeutic efficacy of subsequent therapy with other nucleoside analogues such as lamivudine. Peripheral neuropathy is the most frequent dose-limiting adverse effect associated with zalcitabine therapy and is generally reversible on discontinuation of treatment. Stomatitis and mouth ulcers may occur frequently with zalcitabine therapy but tend to resolve with continuing treatment. Haematological toxicity, which is a common adverse effect associated with zidovudine, is reported infrequently with zalcitabine. Overall, combination therapy with zalcitabine plus zidovudine or saquinavir has been shown to have a tolerability profile comparable to that of either agent alone, although treatment with zidovudine plus zalcitabine was associated with a significant increase in the incidence of haematological toxicity compared with zidovudine monotherapy in one study. Therefore, current data suggest that zalcitabine is a useful antiretroviral agent for inclusion as a component of initial double combination therapy with zidovudine or as part of triple combination therapy including zidovudine plus a protease inhibitor in the management of patients with HIV infection.

Adult↗

The role of phenotyping and replication capacity in anti-HIV therapeutics.

The management of antiretroviral-experienced and -naive HIV-infected patients is becoming increasingly complex with the emergence of multidrug-resistant viruses and with the inter-relationships between numerous virological, immunological and therapeutic factors. In addition to standard surrogate markers of peripheral CD4+ T-cell counts and plasma viral loads, viral resistance phenotype, replication capacity and genotype assays serve as objective measures of viral properties, which presumably reflect, to a certain degree, what is occurring in vivo. This review explores the principles behind, and the basic science and clinical evidence supporting the application of viral resistance phenotypic assays and replication capacity assays in the therapeutic management of HIV disease.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗