PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

D P Vaughan

Publications and source records attributed to D P Vaughan.

9 recordsLinked to original sources

Number of exponential terms describing the solution of an N-compartmental mammillary model: vanishing exponentials.

The solution for a linear mammillary model is always described by a summation of m + 1 negative exponential terms with constant coefficients. m + 1 less than or equal to N, where N is the number of compartments in the model. m is equal to the number of distinct values for the peripheral Ej values. Use is made of matrix notation and the theorems of Browne concerning the eigenvalues of a matrix. The consequences of vanishing exponentials are derived, and in particular the apparent volume of distribution frequently calculated from experimental data is shown not to be unique.

Animals

General derivation of the ideal intravenous drug input required to achieve and maintain a constant plasma drug concentration. Theoretical application to lignocaine therapy.

A constant plasma drug concentration can be achieved and maintained by the intravenous administration of an initial bolus loading dose in conjunction with a constant rate and an exponential intravenous drug infusion. The drug input required to achieve a constant plasma drug concentration is derived without making any assumptions about the nature of drug distribution within the body or elimination from the body.

Infusions, Parenteral

The influence of smoking on the intersubject variation in pentazocine elimination.

The cumulative urinary excretion over 24 h of pentazocine, under conditions of acidic urinary pH, has been measured in smokers and non-smokers using both male and female subjects (seventy subjects in total). A restricted urban population was studied. An overall three-fold inter-subject variation in elimination was observed. The cumulative urinary excretion of pentazocine was normally distributed in both smokers and non-smokers. Smokers metabolize 40% more pentazocine than non-smokers. It is concluded that induction is principally responsible for the observed subject variability.

Adult