PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 10122866

The request for proposal and vendor selection process.

J C Beebe
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The RFP and vendor selection process is critical to the successful acquisition and installation of systems to automate health information management departments. The effort expended in the planning process, through the requirements definition, needs assessment, and conceptual system design are absolutely essential to the development of concise requirements for the RFP document. These requirements are also essential in evaluating vendors during the vendor screening and site visit process. Follow-up documentation evaluating all systems under consideration clarifies each system's utility in terms of the ability to meet or exceed conceptual design requirements. In a competitive vendor environment, these decisions will continue to become more difficult. However, the preparation of clear requirements, and the distribution of a concise RFP will assure the successful acquisition of health information management systems to meet health care needs today and in the future.

Explore related subjects

Abstracting and IndexingCommerceCompetitive BiddingDecision Making, OrganizationalEvaluation Studies as TopicHospital Bed Capacity, 500 and overHospital Information SystemsHospitals, Group PracticeMedical Records Department, HospitalMedical Records Systems, ComputerizedOhioJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J C Beebe. 1992. The request for proposal and vendor selection process.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10122866/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2001

The validity of death certificates: routine validation of death certification and its effects on mortality statistics.

The 3478 death certificates (7.1% of all annual death certificates) of this study comprise those national death certificates in 1995 submitted for validation to the panel representing both medical and nosological expertise. As such, it is highly selected and represents, from the nosological point of view, the most inconsistently filled-in portion of Finnish death certificates. The routine validation procedure is essentially based on exploitation of the extra medical information, i.e. the case history, on the Finnish death certificate form. Altogether, 2813 (80.9%) out of 3478 certificates could be adjusted at the primary panel session; the rest required further clarification. The re-assignment of cause of death by the panel and the impact of panel adjustments on the national mortality statistics is assessed here by comparing the initial death certification and the finally registered underlying cause of death grouped into ICD-9 major categories with special reference to the subcategories of neoplasm, cardiovascular disease (HVD) and unnatural death. A statistically significant decline (p<0.0001) in deaths, both in the category of symptoms, signs and ill-defined conditions and in the pulmonary circulation disease subcategory of HVD with 37.6 and 35.1%, respectively, was observed. The decrease of 11.1% in the benign or NUD neoplasm subcategory and the increase of 8.6 and 7.0% in the categories of endocrine disease, and musculo-skeletal and connective tissue disease, respectively, are essential observations as to the quality of the cause of death register. The effect on the HVD major category was practically nil. At the HVD-subcategorial level, a decrease of 14.0% for diseases of the veins and lymphatics and other circulatory diseases and an increase of 3.5% for hypertensive diseases (HYP) were the two next most obvious alterations to the diseases of the pulmonary circulation, but were without statistical significance. For ischaemic heart disease and other subcategories, the effects were minor. The unnatural deaths as a whole increased in the final statistics with only 0.9%. In the study data, categorial changes ranged from the decrease of 75.2% for symptoms, signs and ill-defined conditions to the increase of 77.3% for endocrine diseases. In conclusion, the Finnish death certificate form, death certification practices and cause of death validation procedure seem to serve the coding of causes of death for mortality statistics appropriately. The results of the study form a relevant reference background to evaluation of epidemiological studies on mortality.

Abstracting and Indexing↗
PubMed2001

Reconsideration of discharge data to measure competition in the hospital industry.

Economists have long used state-collected discharge data to construct Hirschman-Herfindahl (HH) indices measuring hospital competition. Since data are collected to determine the facility providing the service rather than ownership, the difference between the number of reporting facilities and the number of competitors has grown over time due to mergers and networking activities. Consequently, the validity of the discharge HH methodology, as currently employed, is in doubt. Comparing the annual census of New York state acute-care hospitals by the State and the American Hospital Association (AHA), we find that it is increasingly important to account for changes in ownership when constructing such indices.

Abstracting and Indexing↗