PubMed · 10148811
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
A A Head, G L Head. The quality priority.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10148811/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
AIM: This paper describes the development, implementation and validation of general practice standards, supported by a continuous quality improvement (CQI) process that teaches practice teams how to work together to identify and enhance the quality of care they provide. METHODS: Practice standards were developed through consensus by key stakeholders in general practice, pre-tested in four practices, and refined and piloted in 20 practices throughout New Zealand during 1999. A further field trial was undertaken to validate the standards and test the process of practice assessment. During 2000-2001, 74 practices volunteered to be assessed against the standards. Sixty one general practitioners, practice nurses and practice managers, nominated from independent practitioner associations (IPAs) or primary care organisations (PCOs), were trained to undertake the assessments. RESULTS: On five of 13 variables, no statistically significant differences at the 0.05 level were identified between the practices in the field trial and a random sample of practices studied by Kljakovic. The Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners (RNZCGP) standards were found to have excellent face validity and content validity, and good construct validity. Internal consistency was fair. Lessons from the evaluation have informed an improved version of the practice assessment tool. CONCLUSIONS: The validation field trial provided the RNZCGP with a framework and tool for an accreditation process based on the principles of CQI. The tool offers patients and other stakeholders a credible measure of quality and safety at the practice level through a process bridging quality control and quality improvement.
Accreditation of a medical microbiological laboratory according to the ISO 17025 standard confirms that the analyses included in the accreditation are performed with high quality. This paper gives an overview over various quality aspects of direct importance to the patient and the patient's doctor: i) the relationship between the doctor and the laboratory; ii) the selection of relevant analyses; iii) the accuracy of the results; iv) sources and estimation of uncertainty; v) stability of test results; vi) review of complaints; and vii) interpretation of test results. Special aspects of medical microbiology in relation to accreditation are mentioned.