PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 10194577

Doctors' narratives in Balint groups.

S Rabin·B Maoz·G Elata-Alster
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

There is a limited place today for narratives in traditional medicine. However, the Balint group is a legitimate forum providing doctors to unconditionally engage in discussing patients' stories within a secure and safe environment. This paper examines the importance of doctors' narratives in Balint groups and describes how insightful listening may help them move from a mainly biomedical mode to a narrative one, in order to change and repair their patients' and their own personal narratives.

Explore related subjects

CultureHumansMedicine, TraditionalPhysician-Patient RelationsPsychotherapySpeechJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S Rabin, B Maoz, G Elata-Alster. 1999. Doctors' narratives in Balint groups.. https://doi.org/10.1348/000711299159862

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Prone to pregnancy: Orlando, Virginia Woolf and Sally Potter represent the gestating body.

The visibility of pregnancy in contemporary societies through various forms of medical imaging has often been interpreted by feminist critics as negative for the autonomy and experience of pregnant women. Here, I consider the representation of pregnancy in Virginia Woolf's novel, Orlando, and Sally Potter's film of the same name arguing that, despite limited critical attention to Orlando's pregnancy, these texts offer a productive interpretation of gestation that counters conventionally reductive cultural images of that embodied state. In particular, I argue that Potter's translation of Woolf's novel to the screen gives us a useful model for thinking through the new visibility of pregnancy in contemporary Western culture.

Culture↗
PubMed2007

Should the precautionary principle guide our actions or our beliefs?

Two interpretations of the precautionary principle are considered. According to the normative (action-guiding) interpretation, the precautionary principle should be characterised in terms of what it urges doctors and other decision makers to do. According to the epistemic (belief-guiding) interpretation, the precautionary principle should be characterised in terms of what it urges us to believe. This paper recommends against the use of the precautionary principle as a decision rule in medical decision making, based on an impossibility theorem presented in Peterson (2005). However, the main point of the paper is an argument to the effect that decision theoretical problems associated with the precautionary principle can be overcome by paying greater attention to its epistemic dimension. Three epistemic principles inherent in a precautionary approach to medical risk analysis are characterised and defended.

Culture↗