PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10426682

Climacteric vasomotor symptoms do not imply autonomic dysfunction.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study whether oestrogen replacement therapy has an effect on autonomic haemodynamic control in postmenopausal women. DESIGN: A placebo-controlled, prospective, randomised, double-blind cross-over trial. POPULATION: Fourteen healthy postmenopausal women who had had a hysterectomy, of whom 12 were double-blind. METHODS: At the end of each treatment period we conducted autonomic nervous system tests: the Valsalva manoeuvre, the deep breathing test, study at rest and the active orthostatic test. Baroreflex sensitivity was evaluated non-invasively from the Valsalva manoeuvre. Heart rate variability was assessed in time and frequency domains during supine rest and standing. Serum oestradiol was also measured and the previous two weeks' symptoms were assessed. RESULTS: Autonomic nervous function was mostly normal for age and unchanged by oestrogen. Vasomotor symptoms were not associated with autonomic dysfunction. Baroreflex sensitivity was 13.3 ms/mmHg (SD 7.4 ms/mmHg) with placebo and 10.5 ms/mmHg (SD 5.4 ms/mmHg) with oestrogen (P = 0.052). This was mostly due to a fall in three of the highest indices. In the orthostatic test the 30 s blood pressure overshoot in two women exceeded the normal 90% confidence interval upper limit, making the mean response strong, especially in the symptomatic group (n = 7). Oestrogen attenuated this overshoot. CONCLUSIONS: Oestrogen did not have a consistent effect on the autonomic nervous system. Oestrogen attenuated a highly sensitive baroreflex and a strong 30 s blood pressure rise in the orthostatic test. This minor effect of oestrogen could be due to the fact that, in general, women with menopausal symptoms do not have impaired autonomic haemodynamic control. The effect of oestrogen in women with autonomic nervous system dysfunction remains to be studied.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

I Virtanen, P Polo-Kantola, R Erkkola, O Polo, E Ekholm. 1999. Climacteric vasomotor symptoms do not imply autonomic dysfunction.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08216.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The diagnostic workup of patients with neuropathic pain.

Determining the causes of neuropathic pain is more than an epistemological exercise. At its essence, it is a quest to delineate mechanisms of dysfunction through which treatment strategies can be created that are effective in reducing, ameliorating, or eliminating symptomatology. To date, predictors of which patients will develop neuropathic pain or who will respond to specific therapies are lacking, and present therapies have been developed mainly through trial and error. Our current inability to make therapeutically meaningful decisions based on ancillary test data is illustrated by the following: In a study specifically designed to assess the response of patients with painful distal sensory neuropathies to the 5% lidocaine patch, no relationship between treatment response and distal leg skin biopsy, QST, or sensory nerve conduction study results could be established. From a mechanistic perspective, the hypothesis that the lidocaine patch would be most effective in patients with relatively intact epidermal innervation, whose neuropathic pain is presumed attributable to "irritable nociceptors," and least effective in patients with few surviving epidermal nociceptors, presumably with "deafferentation pain," was unproven. The possible explanations are multiple and outside the scope of this review. However, these findings, coupled with the disparity in C-fiber subtype involvement in diabetic small-fiber neuropathy, and the recently reported inability of enzyme replacement therapy in Fabry disease to influence intraepidermal innervation density, while having mixed effects on cold and warm QST thresholds, and beneficial effects on sudomotor findings, when therapeutic benefit was demonstrated, lead one to conclude that the specificity of ancillary testing in neuropathic pain is inadequate at present, and reinforce the aforementioned caveats about inferential conclusions from indirect data. The diagnosis of neuropathic pain mechanisms is in its nascent stages and ancillary testing remains "subordinate," "subsidiary," and "auxiliary" as defined in Webster's Third New International Dictionary. As a consequence of these difficulties, the recent approach by Bennett and his colleagues may have merit. They have hypothesized (and provide data in support) that chronic pain can be more or less neuropathic on a spectrum between "likely," "possible," and "unlikely," based on patient responses on validated neuropathic pain symptom scales, when compared with specialist pain physician certainty of the presence of neuropathic pain on a 100-mm visual analog scale. The symptoms most associated with neuropathic pain were dysesthesias, evoked pain, paroxysmal pain, thermal pain, autonomic complaints, and descriptions of the pain as being sharp, hot, or cold, with high sensitivity. Higher scores for these symptoms correlated with greater clinician certainty of the presence of neuropathic pain mechanisms. Considering each individual patient's chronic pain as being somewhere on a continuum between "purely nociceptive" and "purely neuropathic" may have diagnostic and therapeutic relevance by enhancing specificity, but this requires clinical confirmation. Thus, symptom assessment remains indispensable in the evaluation of neuropathic pain, ancillary testing notwithstanding

Autonomic Nervous System↗