PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10429717

Breast cancer: computer simulation method for estimating optimal intervals for screening.

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop and evaluate a mathematic method that can be used to determine the optimal screening interval for detection of breast cancer prior to distant metastatic spread. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A computer simulation was developed with the use of biologically based data from the literature on the rates of tumor growth and spread, which can be used to calculate the course of breast cancer growth and metastasis. RESULTS: On the basis of the data available at this time, the results of the simulations suggested that a screening interval of 2 years would result in a 22% reduction in the rate of distant metastatic disease, an interval of 1 year would result in a 51% reduction, and an interval of 6 months would result in an 80% reduction. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that more frequent screening could dramatically reduce the death rate from breast cancer.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J S Michaelson, E Halpern, D B Kopans. 1999. Breast cancer: computer simulation method for estimating optimal intervals for screening.. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.212.2.r99au49551

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The use of postal reminders to reduce non-attendance at an orthodontic clinic: a randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of issuing a patient reminder plus a confirmation slip on the attendance of orthodontic new patients. SETTING: Department of Orthodontics, University Dental Hospital of Manchester. DESIGN: A randomised controlled trial. METHODS: New patients were randomly allocated to:receive a reminder letter and return a confirmation slip ornot receive a reminder. OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient attendance at the clinic. RESULTS: A total of 232 patients were entered into the study between June 18, 2001 and August 29, 2001. These were randomly allocated to 115 (49.8%) in the reminder group and 116 (50.2%) in the no reminder group. If the patient received a reminder and returned the confirmation they were less likely to fail the appointment than if they did not receive a reminder (OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.2 to 0.96) There was an effect of social deprivation, if the patients lived in an area of high social deprivation they were 2.7 (95% CI 1.1 to 6.5) times more likely to fail to attend an appointment than people who were more affluent. CONCLUSIONS: The use of postal reminders for orthodontic consultation appointments appears to result in a useful increase of appointments that are kept or cancelled in advance.

Appointments and Schedules↗