PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10469118

Multiple primary melanoma.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Incidence rates of cutaneous malignant melanoma (CMM) have been increasing for decades among Caucasian populations worldwide. Multiple factors identify persons at increased risk of CMM, including those with a family history of melanoma and those with atypical moles. Approximately 6-12% of melanomas are familial and approximately 12% of patients with familial melanoma have multiple primary melanomas. OBJECTIVE: To report a case of a patient with atypical moles and with 17 multiple primary melanomas. To review the literature on multiple primary melanomas as well as to review the genetics and treatment of melanoma. CONCLUSION: Patients with numerous atypical moles and a family or personal history of melanoma are at greatest risk for developing CMM. Patients from this population tend to develop CMM approximately 10 years earlier than the general population and have an increased risk for developing multiple primary melanomas. Since genetic tests capable of detecting individuals with an inherited susceptibility to CMM are not available, it is important to identify those patients with an increased risk and monitor them closely with regular total-body examinations.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

N Conrad, P Leis, I Orengo, E E Medrano, T G Hayes, S Baer, T Rosen. 1999. Multiple primary melanoma.. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1524-4725.1999.98050.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Quantitative real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction: normalization to rRNA or single housekeeping genes is inappropriate for human tissue biopsies.

Careful normalization is essential when using quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assays to compare mRNA levels between biopsies from different individuals or cells undergoing different treatment. Generally this involves the use of internal controls, such as mRNA specified by a housekeeping gene, ribosomal RNA (rRNA), or accurately quantitated total RNA. The aim of this study was to compare these methods and determine which one can provide the most accurate and biologically relevant quantitative results. Our results show significant variation in the expression levels of 10 commonly used housekeeping genes and 18S rRNA, both between individuals and between biopsies taken from the same patient. Furthermore, in 23 breast cancers samples mRNA and protein levels of a regulated gene, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), correlated only when normalized to total RNA, as did microvessel density. Finally, mRNA levels of VEGF and the most popular housekeeping gene, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), were significantly correlated in the colon. Our results suggest that the use of internal standards comprising single housekeeping genes or rRNA is inappropriate for studies involving tissue biopsies.

Biopsy↗