PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10666940

[Ornithosis--studies in correlation with an outbreak].

Abstract

An outbreak of ornithosis with 8 cases of ornithosis pneumonia and 2 lethal complications was investigated in workers in a poultry farm and processing plant and a comparative seroepidemiological study of antigen responses was performed in 3 collectives: No. I: n = 82/87 workers in the processing plant, where the outbreak occurred; No. II: n = 83 workers in a chicken slaughter-house; No. III: n = 82 as matched-pair group to collective No. I with the same age and sex, but without occupational risk. The test systems were: genus specific complement fixation reaction (CFR), Ipazyme commercial slide kit containing LGV antigen and a type-specific microimmunofluorescence (MIF) technique with antigens binding C. psittaci, pneumonia and trachomatis IgA, IgG and IgM. 57/82 (71.9%) workers in group No. I were chlamydial antibody-positive, whereas only 22/82 of the population Nr. III--control group (odds ratio 6.2/3.2-12.3 p < or = 0.05). 16/83 (19.3%) of the workers in the chicken slaughterhouse had antibodies against chlamydia group antigens. 30/82 of the collective No. I had serological evidence of a recent or current infection with higher antibody titres in CFR and IPAZYME-Test and/or antibody response against IgA and IgM (MIF). 43.3% of the latter could be serologically detected as specific infections with C. psittaci. 10 of 18 (55%) workers employed in the recent 3 months had serological signs of an acute infection. There was no association between the point of contact with the poultry (live hang areas, slaughtery, evisceration, cooling carcasses) and the prevalence of antibody response. The possible routes of infection, inhalation of dried excretions or aerosols and via hand-to-mouth contacts are discussed. In specimens of cloacal swabs and faeces of the ducks chlamydiae could be found although the animals were asymptomatic. The results of this study demonstrate that in poultry plants, where ducks and other poultry living in an aqueous habitat are slaughtered and processed, a high risk of C. psittaci infection (70.2%) and ornithosis morbidity (25%) with a lethality of 8.3% can exist. Since the eradication of C. psittaci in poultry does not seem to be possible at the moment, preventive measures e.g. gloves, masks, information and medical examinations of the workers must be implemented in those slaughterhouses and plants where C. psittaci is suspected or common.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P Lederer, R Müller. 1999. [Ornithosis--studies in correlation with an outbreak].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10666940/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Behavioural responses of poultry during kosher slaughter and their implications for the birds' welfare.

Measurements were made during Shechita (kosher) slaughter of 692 meat chickens, including the behaviour of the birds during the procedure and the times from their removal from the crate, to neck cutting, bleed-out and shackling. Four of 100 birds showed a mild physical response to neck cutting but the others showed no response. Approximately 60 per cent of the birds showed a physical response to touching the eye or eyelid at up to 5 seconds after neck cutting, but by 15 seconds none showed this response. The birds became unable to retain their posture and suffered involuntary muscular contractions at 12 to 15 seconds after neck cutting and had lost approximately 40 per cent of their total blood volume by 30 seconds after neck cutting.

Abattoirs↗

Assessing the effect of interventions on the risk of cattle and sheep carrying Escherichia coli O157:H7 to the abattoir using a stochastic model.

Escherichia coli O157:H7 persists in being a threat to food safety. The mechanisms behind the spread of E. coli O157:H7 on the farm are complex and poorly understood. The objective of this study was to apply a Monte Carlo model, constructed to simulate the propagation of E. coli O157:H7 in cattle and sheep on the farm, to both test the effect of different interventions on the risk of animals carrying E. coli O157:H7 to the abattoir and to develop understanding of the underlying processes, including the identification of areas that could benefit from further research. An overview of the model including key assumptions is given. The output statistics from batches of 100 runs of the model were collected. From the model output, a cumulative frequency distribution of the prevalence and specific shedding level for the groups of cattle or sheep being sent to the abattoir were generated. Stochastic dominance was used to compare the results of the model outputs. Using the shorthand that "risk" means the likelihood of carrying E. coli O157:H7 to the abattoir, key conclusions from the study included: mixing sheep and cattle increases the risk in both groups; merging groups of animals of the same species into larger groups increases the risk substantially; increasing stocking density increases the risk independently of group size; decreasing the group size decreases the E. coli O157:H7 prevalence independently of stocking density; a very high level of barn hygiene reduces the risk; a shorter time between spreading farmyard manure and grazing and an increased background level of E. coli O157:H7 in the model increases the risk. The background level could be influenced by the presence of wild animals carrying the organism. The parameters to which the model is most sensitive are those related to transmission from grass and enclosures to animals, pathogen survival on grass, in slurry and in barns and contact between animals.

Abattoirs↗