PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10745066

Bust without boom.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J W Goldzieher. 2000. Bust without boom.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-7824(99)00120-1

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Hormonal emergency contraception.

In the 1960s, high-dose estrogen was identified as a highly effective emergency contraceptive but was associated with a high frequency of nausea and vomiting. The combination of low-dose estrogen and a progestin (the Yuzpe regimen) is highly effective and much better tolerated. Recently, a progestin-only regimen containing levonorgestrel was found to be more effective than the Yuzpe regimen and caused significantly less nausea and vomiting. Danazol, an antigonadotropin, is well tolerated but has questionable efficacy Mifepristone has several pharmacologic actions that make it highly effective with an adverse-effect profile similar to that of the Yuzpe regimen. Progress has been made in the last 3 years toward increasing the number of emergency contraceptives that are accessible to women in the United States, and several highly effective options are available. The most effective and well-tolerated regimen available is levonorgestrel. However, the barriers to access and low patient and provider awareness limit the impact of emergency contraception on the rate of unintended pregnancies.

Contraception↗

A competing risk approach to the analysis of trials of alternative intra-uterine devices (IUDs) for fertility regulation.

The methods of survival analysis have had a profound influence on the way that studies concerned with the safety and efficacy of intra-uterine devices (IUDs) for fertility control have been designed, conducted, analysed and reported. For example, the Kaplan-Meier technique has been used to summarize the results of controlled clinical trials of alternative devices and the logrank test used to make any comparisons. A particular feature of IUD studies is the large number of possible causes of failure (reasons for discontinuation of the device). These lead to considerations of competing risks, where in this framework, the discontinuations are considered as competing causes of contraceptive failure. In this context, we compare the net and crude probability estimates of discontinuation rates using continuous time and argue for the routine use of the latter. We use data from a randomized multi-centre trialon the long-term safety and efficacy of two IUDs, TCu220C and TCu380A, for illustration.

Contraception↗