PubMed · 10926248
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
R J Gibson. Flexor surface material.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005131-200006000-00014
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
STUDY DESIGN: In this cadaveric study, a computer-assisted image guidance system was tested for accuracy of thoracic pedicle screw placement. OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the system's accuracy for thoracic pedicle screw placement in vitro. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The effective use and reliability of pedicle screw instrumentation in providing short-segment stabilization and correction of deformity is well known in the lumbar spine. Pedicle screw placement in the thoracic spine is difficult because of the small dimensions of the thoracic pedicles and risk to the adjacent spinal cord and neurovascular structures. Investigators have shown the improved accuracy of computer-assisted lumbar pedicle screw placement; but the accuracy of computer-assisted thoracic pedicle screw placement, which is becoming more widely used, has not been shown. METHODS: In five human cadavers, 120 thoracic pedicle screws were placed with computer-assisted image guidance. The largest clinically feasible screw was used based on the cross-sectional dimensions of each pedicle. The accuracy was assessed by postoperative computed tomography and visual inspection. RESULTS: The overall pedicle cortex violation was 23 of 120 pedicles (19.2%). Nine violations (7.5%) were graded as major and 14 (11.7%) as minor. A marked and progressive learning curve was evident with the perforation rates that decreased from 37.5% in the first cadaver to 4.2% in the last two cadavers. CONCLUSIONS: Accurate thoracic pedicle screw placement is feasible with computer-assisted surgery. However, as with any other new surgical technology, the learning curve must be recognized and incorporated into the necessary fundamental knowledge and experience for these procedures.
STUDY DESIGN: Comparison was made of the accuracy of a pedicle bore performed by conventional technique and by using an individual template in the lumbar spine of cadavers. OBJECTIVES: The fixation of pedicle screws necessitates a high amount of surgical skill and experience to avoid lesions of nerves and vessels. By using individual templates in a cadaver study the goal was to prove the accuracy and efficiency of this less-invasive image-guided surgery in comparison with the conventional technique by fluoroscopy and computed tomographic (CT) scan. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Based on three-dimensional models generated from CT scans of the lumbar spine, precise preoperative planning of the position and trajectory of pedicle screws is possible. In comparison with other means of computer-assisted spine surgery with navigation systems, in which a time-consuming intraoperative matching of the bone surface structure is necessary, the use of individual templates enables the surgeon to reduce the operation time considerably. METHODS: Individual templates are customized on the basis of three-dimensional reconstructions of the bone structures extracted from CT image data and depending on the individual preoperative surgical planning, which uses the desktop image processing system for orthopedic surgery (DISOS). A desktop-computer-controlled milling device is used as a three-dimensional printer to automatically mold the shape of small reference areas of the bone surface into the body of the template. Postoperative CT scans were obtained and the accuracy of the pedicle bore rated by two independent observers. RESULTS: The preparation time with the individual template lasted slightly longer than with the conventional operation technique (555 seconds and 482 seconds, respectively). Fluoroscopic study took a mean time of 31.5 seconds, with the conventional operation technique and 5.5 seconds with the individual template. The assessment of the postoperative CT scans demonstrated a higher accuracy of the pedicle bore with the individual template. CONCLUSIONS: This cadaveric study has shown that overall operation time including the fluoroscopy time can be shortened by using the individual template for the pedicle bore. The individual template is an alternative to the computer-assisted navigation systems with a good cost-performance ratio without excessive technical workload on the physicians or the surgical personnel. Further investigations must be conducted to validate the clinical applicability of this system.
We operated on 26 patients with cervical spine disorders (13 with traumatic lesions, 3 with spinal stenosis and myelopathy, 1 with osteomyelitis and 9 with metastasis) with posterior stabilization. A new implant system (Cervi-Fix) based on rods, enabling a choice of either screw or laminar hook fixation in a free combination, was used. The system was evaluated for ease of use, for safety, regarding complications related to the system, and for efficacy, regarding loss of correction and signs of instability. The patients were followed for a mean period of 11 months, with ordinary and flexion/extension radiographs and clinical examination. No complications related to the implant system were observed. Loss of correction was observed in one patient. We found constructs with few vertebral fixation points, especially with screws, easy to handle, whereas multiple-claw constructs were time consuming. This implant system seems to be versatile, safe and efficient, but could be improved by the development of instruments for the insertion of the hooks.