PubMed · 11054299
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
M Zegans, T Lietman. 2000. Bilateral simultaneous LASIK.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(00)00104-4
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
PURPOSE: To report a penetrating corneal transplant in which there was inadvertent inversion of the corneal button. DESIGN: Interventional case report. METHODS: A 48-year-old man with lattice corneal dystrophy had a third penetrating keratoplasty in the right eye 3 years after the second procedure and 2 years following renal transplantation. RESULTS: Histologic examination of the corneal button from the second penetrating keratoplasty disclosed inadvertent corneal graft inversion. Survival epithelium from the donor in the anterior chamber may be explained by the ocular anterior chamber-associated immune deviation or by the patient's systemic cyclosporine A (CsA) treatment after renal transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Histologically proven corneal button inversion is a rare cause of corneal graft failure.
Conductive keratoplasty (CK) is an electrical-current-based technique for steepening the central cornea to reduce low to moderate hyperopia. We report 4 patients who had CK to correct hyperopia after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and were followed for at least 6 months. An overcorrection was noted after the CK procedure in all patients, but no sight-threatening complications arose. Conductive keratoplasty appears to be safe and well tolerated after LASIK. However, the algorithms should be modified to increase the predictability of the CK procedure in previously treated eyes.
PURPOSE: To report a case of a primary corneal diffuse neurofibroma in a patient with von Recklinghausen disease (NF-1). METHODS: Case report. A physical examination and histopathology were performed. The immunohistochemical studies were performed using an avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex technique on formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue. Histologic sections from corneal tissue were incubated with primary antibodies against vimentin and S-100 protein. A complementary ultrastructural study of the same formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue was made. RESULTS: The ophthalmologic examination revealed a yellowish-white elevated mass that involved the supratemporal cornea but not the limbus. Histologic study showed a tumor of the peripheral nerve sheath, a diffuse neurofibroma in the corneal stroma, and proliferation of spindle cells with markedly elongated nuclei. Cells comprising the tumor reacted with vimentin and S-100 protein, and the ultrastructural studies revealed myelinated nerve fibers confirming the diagnosis. CONCLUSION: The development of a primary diffuse neurofibroma in the cornea of patients with von Recklinghausen disease is possible. The present case supports the statement that neurofibromas arising from the peripheral nerve sheath may involve any part of the body.