PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11057735

Auditory temporal processing and lexical/nonlexical reading in developmental dyslexics.

Abstract

Relationships between lexical/nonlexical reading and auditory temporal processing were examined. Poor nonlexical readers (poor nonword readers, phonologic dyslexics) had difficulty across tone tasks irrespective of speed of presentation or mode of recall. Poor lexical readers (poor irregular word readers, surface dyslexics) had difficulty recalling tones in a sequence only when they were presented rapidly. Covariate analysis supported these findings, revealing that nonlexical (nonword) reading performance is associated with general auditory performance, but lexical (irregular word) reading is particularly associated with auditory sequencing. These findings suggest that phonologic and surface dyslexics perform differently on nonspeech auditory tasks. Because the two different types of poor readers did not differ significantly on tests of memory and learning but did differ on auditory tasks, we suggest that their performance on the auditory tasks may reflect auditory processing abnormalities as opposed to more general learning or memory difficulties. In addition to these observed qualitative differences between groups on the tone tasks, collapsing groups (all readers) revealed significant correlations between nonword reading and the Same-Different tone tasks in particular, whereas irregular word reading was not associated with any tone tasks; there also appears to be a quantitative relationship between nonlexical reading and Same-Different tone task performance as better or worse nonword reading predicts better or worse performance on the Same-Different tone tasks. In particular, it is conceivable that an auditory temporal processing deficit might contribute to poor nonword reading.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

L Cestnick, J Jerger. 2000. Auditory temporal processing and lexical/nonlexical reading in developmental dyslexics.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11057735/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Auditory processing disorder (APD): first normative data for the standardised diagnosis in school-age children].

BACKGROUND: Disorders in auditory processing have gained importance over the past 10 years. A first consensus statement defined this disorder and described several of its features. At the present stage of research, tests are missing to discriminate between normal and disturbed auditory processing development. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 142 children from the second and third grades (105 control group, 37 patients) were examined for audiological, auditory and cognitive development, as well as speech and writing abilities. RESULTS: For the first time, normative data were defined for children from 8-9 years of age, and characteristic aspects of auditory processing disorder (APD) could be quantified. CONCLUSION: This study supplies a test-battery with important elements for diagnosing APD under defined conditions.

Auditory Perceptual Disorders↗

Behavioural and event-related potentials evidence for pitch discrimination deficits in dyslexic children: improvement after intensive phonic intervention.

Although it is commonly accepted that dyslexic children have auditory phonological deficits, the precise nature of these deficits remains unclear. This study examines potential pitch processing deficit in dyslexic children, and recovery after specific training, by measuring event-related brain potentials (ERPs) and behavioural responses to pitch manipulations within natural speech. In two experimental sessions, separated by 6 weeks of training, 10 dyslexic children, aged 9-12, were compared to reading age-matched controls, using sentences from children's books. The pitch of the sentence's final words was parametrically manipulated (either congruous, weakly or strongly incongruous). While dyslexics followed a training focused on phonological awareness and grapheme-to-phoneme conversion, controls followed a non-auditory training. Before training, controls outperformed dyslexic children in the detection of the strong pitch incongruity. Moreover, while strong pitch incongruities were associated with increased late positivity (P300 component) in controls, no such pattern was found in dyslexics. Most importantly, pitch discrimination performance was significantly improved, and the amplitude of the late positivity to the strong pitch incongruity enhanced, for dyslexics after a relatively brief period of training, so that their pattern of response more closely resemble those of controls.

Auditory Perceptual Disorders↗

Congenital amusia.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Auditory Perceptual Disorders↗