PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11059368

Cosmeceuticals.

Abstract

The author uses kinetin, a plant-derived nucleotide, as an example to summarize the approach to advising a patient on a new product. (1) Does it penetrate the stratum corneum? Topically applied nucleotides can penetrate human skin, and one of the most active and useful of these for the treatment of actinic keratoses, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), is used widely in dermatology. 5-FU derives some of its benefit from its uptake, specifically in actinic keratoses, which do not have a complete epidermal barrier. The molecule is able to penetrate the stratum corneum. It is not clear that topically applied nucleotides have the same degree of penetration on photodamaged skin without actinic keratoses. (2) Is there a plausible biochemical mechanism of action? 5-FU has a well-known mechanism of action (i.e., the inhibition of DNA/RNA synthesis by incorporation of a false pyrimidine analog). The mechanism of action for furfuryladenine in human skin remains unknown and needs to be shown. If furfuryladenine functions as an antioxidant, it may be useful as a photoprotectant. This function does not account for a mechanism of action for the reversal of photoaging, however. (3) Are there published peer-reviewed, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, statistically significant clinical trials to substantiate the efficacy claim? Peer-reviewed, double-blinded, statistically significant clinical trials on furfuryladenine have not been published to date. The field of cosmeceuticals presents a quandary. The list of cosmeceuticals for the dermatologist to assess grows longer each year. It is possible that some of the active ingredients are beneficial physiologically in human skin and that they can offer specific benefits, such as photoprotection. Further research needs to be conducted to validate these claims. It also is likely that a wide variety of molecules purported to be active in human skin do not have any physiologic benefit in human skin. Only further research can answer these difficult questions.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D Kligman. 2000. Cosmeceuticals.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0733-8635(05)70211-4

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

On the exact interval estimation for the difference in paired areas under the ROC curves.

An important measure for comparison of accuracy between two diagnostic procedures is the difference in paired areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Non-parametric and maximum likelihood methods have been proposed for interval estimation for the difference in paired areas under ROC curves. However, these two methods are asymptotic procedures and their performance in finite sample sizes has not been thoroughly investigated. We propose to use the concept of generalized pivotal quantities (GPQs) to construct an exact confidence interval for the difference in paired areas under ROC curves. A simulation study is conducted to empirically investigate the probability coverage and expected length of the three methods for various combinations of sample sizes, values of the area under the ROC curve and correlations. Simulation results demonstrate that the exact confidence interval based on the concept of GPQs provides not only sufficient probability coverage but also reasonable expected length. Numerical examples using published data sets illustrate the proposed method.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗

An efficient test for the analysis of dichotomized variables when the reliability is known.

A difference in an outcome variable between the treatment groups in a trial does not necessarily mean that there is a difference in the number of patients who experience relevant improvement on that variable. When the relevant improvement corresponds with an outcome or change in outcome that exceeds a certain threshold, the outcome variable can be dichotomized. A responder is a patient whose outcome exceeds the threshold. Comparisons can be made between the number of responders in the two treatment groups using logistic regression, or some other method to evaluate binary outcomes. An important disadvantage of this approach is the loss of power. In general, it is more efficient to test the difference between the mean values. We developed a statistical test that compares response rates for a dichotomized variable. It requires that an estimate of the reliability of the outcome variable is available. Simulations showed that the test was valid and robust over a wide range of distributions and sample sizes. The power was greater than the power of a chi(2) test, which would enable substantial reduction in the sample size.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗

Sample size determination for logistic regression revisited.

There is no consensus on the approach to compute the power and sample size with logistic regression. Some authors use the likelihood ratio test; some use the test on proportions; some suggest various approximations to handle the multivariate case. We advocate the use of the Wald test since the Z-score is routinely used for statistical significance testing of regression coefficients. The null-variance formula became popular from early studies, which contradicts modern software, which utilizes the method of maximum likelihood estimation (MLE), when the variance of the MLE is estimated at the MLE, not at the null. We derive general Wald-based power and sample size formulas for logistic regression and then apply them to binary exposure and confounder to obtain a closed-form expression. These formulas are applied to minimize the total sample size in a case-control study to achieve a given power by optimizing the ratio of controls to cases. Approximately, the optimal number of controls to cases is equal to the square root of the alternative odds ratio. Our sample size and power calculations can be carried out online at www.dartmouth.edu/ approximately eugened.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗