PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 1109664

The general practitioner and changes in obstetric practice.

Abstract

Compared with the 1960s fewer general practitioners today are obtaining a postgraduate diploma in obstetrics, and the future more stringent criteria for practitioners wishing to undertake this will probably restrict the numbers of family doctors wishing to practise in this field. More deliveries are being performed in institutions--either in consultant or general-practitioner units. Morever, within a decade probably few G.P.s will attend during normal labour or delivery, which can and should be conducted by midwives. In future, therefore, G.P.s should have a new role in obstetrics, being responsible for some antenatal supervision and postnatal care, including postnatal examinations, taking a cervical smear, and advice on birth control.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G Lloyd. 1975-01-11. The general practitioner and changes in obstetric practice.. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.1.5949.79

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Changes in Norwegian obstetric practices, 1915-1961].

BACKGROUND: Established in 1967, the Medical Birth Registry of Norway has detailed accounts of all births in Norway. We have, however, only limited knowledge of obstetric practices in Norway in the decades before the Birth Registry was established. One important source is the annual reports of the Maternity Clinic in Oslo. MATERIAL: We analysed the annual reports for the period 1915-1961 with special emphasis on operative deliveries. RESULTS: The obstetric forceps was used in 6.5-12.5% (median 8.7%) of cephalic presentations. In 1960, the vacuum extractor was used for the first time. The rate of caesarean sections increased from 1.5% in the late 1930s to 6.3% in 1961. The proportion of operative deliveries increased up until 1944-55 when it was 14-16%, then fell in the years to 1960 when it was about 12%. Between 1915-1934, maternal mortality was as high as 6.4 per thousand. From the mid-1930s, it steadily decreased to 0.6 per thousand in the last five-year period. Well over one third of the deaths were caused by eclampsia or serious preeclampsia. INTERPRETATION: Birth traumas and neonatal death was the price paid for saving the mothers' lives and health. The operative activity was higher than what might be expected on the basis of the late-1960s data in the Birth Registry. The increase in caesarean sections was steepest during the Second World War, at a time when the number of deliveries in the clinic rose substantially.

Birth Rate↗

A case-control study of the seasonality effects on schizophrenic births on a tropical island.

A substantial body of evidence from dozens of studies in many different countries suggests an excess number of individuals with schizophrenia are born in winter months. The presence of a seasonality effect in regions with year-round warm climate, however, has rarely been examined. The major purpose of this project was to better understand if the seasonality effect on schizophrenic births that has been reported in other, mostly cold regions of the Northern Hemisphere, also can be detected in a warm, tropical climate. We set out to study birth months as risk factors, quantifying the risk for being born with schizophrenia for every month of the winter season in terms of incidence rate ratios (IRRs) in the central region of Puerto Rico. We also analyzed climatic data in order to determine if there was any correlation between the rate of schizophrenic births (n=710) to births in the general population (n=101,248) and average rainfall and temperature for every month of the year in our period of study (January 1932-December 1967). Our results suggest that the risk of developing schizophrenia is 36.5% higher for people born in February than for people born in the other months of the year (95% C.I.=6.6-74.8%). We also found correlations between the rate of schizophrenic to control births for any given month, and rainfall 4 months earlier (r=0.66, p=0.010), and temperature 5 months earlier (r=0.64, p=0.013) that remained significant after correcting for multiple comparisons.

Birth Rate↗