PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 11129473

Bivariate binary data analysis with nonignorably missing outcomes.

M C Paik·R Sacco·I F Lin
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

One of the objectives in the Northern Manhattan Stroke Study is to investigate the impact of stroke subtype on the functional status 2 years after the first ischemic stroke. A challenge in this analysis is that the functional status at 2 years after stroke is not completely observed. In this paper, we propose a method to handle nonignorably missing binary functional status when the baseline value and the covariates are completely observed. The proposed method consists of fitting four separate binary regression models: for the baseline outcome, the outcome 2 years after the stroke, the product of the previous two, and finally, the missingness indicator. We then conduct a sensitivity analysis by varying the assumptions about the third and the fourth binary regression models. Our method belongs to an imputation paradigm and can be an alternative to the weighting method of Rotnitzky and Robins (1997, Statistics in Medicine 16, 81-102). A jackknife variance estimate is proposed for the variance of the resulting estimate. The proposed analysis can be implemented using statistical software such as SAS.

Explore related subjects

BiometryComputer SimulationPersons with DisabilitiesEducational StatusFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleModels, StatisticalNew York CityProbabilityRacial GroupsRegression AnalysisSoftwareStrokeStroke RehabilitationTime FactorsComparative StudyJournal ArticleResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M C Paik, R Sacco, I F Lin. 2000. Bivariate binary data analysis with nonignorably missing outcomes.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.01145.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2002

Toward synthetic combinatorial peptide libraries in positional scanning format (PS-SCL)-based identification of CD8+ Tumor-reactive T-Cell Ligands: a comparative analysis of PS-SCL recognition by a single tumor-reactive CD8+ cytolytic T-lymphocyte clone.

The use of synthetic combinatorial peptide libraries in positional scanning format (PS-SCL) has emerged recently as an alternative approach for the identification of peptides recognized by T lymphocytes. The choice of both the PS-SCL used for screening experiments and the method used for data analysis are crucial for implementing this approach. With this aim, we tested the recognition of different PS-SCL by a tyrosinase 368-376-specific CTL clone and analyzed the data obtained with a recently developed biometric data analysis based on a model of independent and additive contribution of individual amino acids to peptide antigen recognition. Mixtures defined with amino acids present at the corresponding positions in the native sequence were among the most active for all of the libraries. Somewhat surprisingly, a higher number of native amino acids were identifiable by using amidated COOH-terminal rather than free COOH-terminal PS-SCL. Also, our data clearly indicate that when using PS-SCL longer than optimal, frame shifts occur frequently and should be taken into account. Biometric analysis of the data obtained with the amidated COOH-terminal nonapeptide library allowed the identification of the native ligand as the sequence with the highest score in a public human protein database. However, the adequacy of the PS-SCL data for the identification for the peptide ligand varied depending on the PS-SCL used. Altogether these results provide insight into the potential of PS-SCL for the identification of CTL-defined tumor-derived antigenic sequences and may significantly implement our ability to interpret the results of these analyses.

Biometry↗
PubMed2002

A seminar series in applied biostatistics for clinical research fellows, faculty and staff.

Familiarity with experimental design and statistical analysis techniques is necessary for investigators to conduct state-of-the-art research in clinical medicine. A wide range of options for biostatistical training is available. These include formal academic courses for credit, one-on-one education offered under the guise of consultation, self-paced textbook or computer learning, intensive short courses, portions of extended courses spanning an assortment of other subjects, and a continuing series of seminars or lectures covering selected topics in statistics. The latter structure is described in this article. We offered an eight-week lecture series focusing on a new topic in biostatistics each week. The course targeted clinical faculty, postdoctoral fellows, residents, and other interested research staff at a large medical research institution. The series focused on interpretation of medical journal articles with regard to statistical issues. Another objective was to provide information to increase a participant's expertise in the design of research studies. Guidance was offered for effective communication with collaborating biostatisticians. The format and contents of the seminar series are described. Aspects of the course that proved to be successful are discussed.

Biometry↗
PubMed2002

Body of evidence.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Biometry↗