PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 11175074

Improvement in Endocardial Border Delineation Using Tissue Harmonic Imaging.

Harald Becher·Klaus Tiemann·Thomas Schlosser·Christoph Pohl·Navin C. Nanda·Michalakis A. Averkiou·Jeff Powers·Berndt Lüderitz
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND METHODS: For years, tissue has been assumed to be a linear medium in diagnostic ultrasound applications; thus, no backscattered signals in the second harmonic band are expected in harmonic imaging without the injection of a contrast agent. However, it has been shown that a useful tissue image is formed even without a contrast agent. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether this tissue harmonic image provided improved visualization of endocardial borders. Fifty-six adult patients with various heart diseases were investigated using conventional two-dimensional echocardiography and tissue harmonic imaging. In 30 of these patients, the left ventricular endocardial borders were well defined in the standard parasternal and apical views using conventional two-dimensional echocardiography. In the remaining 26 patients, delineation of endocardial borders was not possible in at least two segments. The equipment used was an ATL HDI-3000 diagnostic system equipped with harmonic imaging. RESULTS: In all 56 patients, the myocardium and valves could be imaged with tissue harmonic imaging. Harmonic recordings were sharper and contained fewer clutter artifacts than conventional recordings. Most striking was the enhancement of left ventricular endocardial borders. In the 26 patients with incomplete delineation of left ventricular endocardial borders, wall motion could be evaluated in 290 of 312 (93%) segments with tissue harmonic imaging compared with only 168 of 312 (54%) segments with conventional echocardiography (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Tissue harmonic imaging improves image quality and can be used to enhance the definition of left ventricular endocardial borders. These findings can be explained by the nonlinear propagation of ultrasound within the tissue, which results in distortion of the transmitted signal and, thus, harmonic generation.

Explore related subjects

Journal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Harald Becher, Klaus Tiemann, Thomas Schlosser, Christoph Pohl, Navin C. Nanda, Michalakis A. Averkiou, Jeff Powers, Berndt Lüderitz. 1998. Improvement in Endocardial Border Delineation Using Tissue Harmonic Imaging.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8175.1998.tb00642.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2027

Effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccines against hospitalisation according to frailty risk: a prespecified analysis of the randomised trial DANFLU-2.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a major risk factor for influenza-related complications and can influence vaccine effectiveness. We aimed to assess the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of high-dose (HD-IIV) versus standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (SD-IIV) in older adults aged 65 years or older according to frailty risk. METHODS: This study was a prespecified analysis of DANFLU-2, an open-label, individually randomised trial, conducted in Denmark during three consecutive influenza seasons (2022-23, 2023-24, and 2024-25). Adults aged 65 years or older were randomised (1:1) to the HD-IIV or SD-IIV group. The primary endpoint was hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia. Frailty was defined according to the validated Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) based on ICD-10 codes within 10 years before randomisation. Participants were stratified into three HFRS categories, namely low (<5 points), intermediate (5-15 points), and high (>15 points) frailty risk. The rVE of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint was assessed across prespecified HFRS categories and treating HFRS as a continuous variable. Pearson's chi-square test was used to compare safety events across frailty risk groups and randomisation groups. FINDINGS: Among 332&#x2009;438 randomised participants (mean age 73&#xb7;7 years [SD 5&#xb7;8]; 161&#x2009;538 [48&#xb7;6%] were female), 276&#x2009;173 (83&#xb7;1%) had low frailty risk, 52&#x2009;395 (15&#xb7;8%) had intermediate frailty risk, and 3861 (1&#xb7;2%) had high frailty risk. The primary endpoint of hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia occurred in 1424 (0&#xb7;5%) of 276&#x2009;173 participants with low frailty risk, 761 (1&#xb7;5%) of 52&#x2009;395 with intermediate frailty risk, and 163 (4&#xb7;2%) of 3861 with high frailty risk (relative risk [RR] for intermediate vs low frailty risk 2&#xb7;8 [95% CI 2&#xb7;6-3&#xb7;1]; RR for high vs low frailty risk 8&#xb7;2 [7&#xb7;0-9&#xb7;6]). HFRS as a continuous variable significantly modified the effect of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint with higher rVE estimates with increasing HFRS (pinteraction=0&#xb7;020). The rVE was 0&#xb7;2% (95% CI -10&#xb7;8 to 10&#xb7;2) among those with low frailty risk, 13&#xb7;1% (-0&#xb7;4 to 24&#xb7;8) among those with intermediate frailty risk, and 19&#xb7;9% (-10&#xb7;3 to 42&#xb7;1) among those with high frailty risk. No significant interaction was observed when HFRS was assessed according to the prespecified categorical frailty groups (pinteraction=0&#xb7;17). The proportion of participants with at least one serious adverse event increased across frailty risk groups (13&#x2009;366 [4&#xb7;8%] of 275&#x2009;795 for low frailty risk, 5475 [10&#xb7;5%] of 52&#x2009;315 for intermediate frailty risk, and 777 [20&#xb7;2%] of 3850 for high frailty risk; p<0&#xb7;0001), with similar proportions of serious adverse events in the HD-IIV and SD-IIV groups for each frailty risk group. INTERPRETATION: Among adults aged 65 years or older in Denmark, frailty risk might modify the effects of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia, with higher rVE estimates with increasing frailty risk. These findings might support considering high-dose influenza vaccines for frail older adults. However, effect modification was not evident when frailty was assessed using prespecified categorical subgroups, and subgroup-specific estimates were imprecise, with 95% CIs crossing the null. These results should be considered exploratory, warranting further investigation. FUNDING: The DANFLU-2 trial was funded by Sanofi.

Journal Article↗