PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 1136887

Computer analysis of ventricular conduction defects.

H V Pipberger·P F Poblete·H A Pipberger
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Computer criteria for LAHB and LPHB were described together with limits of normal for ortogonal leads. These differ significantly from those used for conventional 12-lead ECG, indicating the need for specific LAHB and LPHB criteria in orthogonal electrocardiography. Multivariate analysis with a likelihood ratio test was used for the separation of records with conduction defects with and without MI. The total number of records was 847. The recognition rate for MI in the presence of LVCD was 66%. In the presence of RVCD, MI was diagnosed correctly in only 55%. This relatively poor result was probably due to the relatively large number of combinations of RCVD with LAHB or LPHB.

Explore related subjects

Bundle-Branch BlockComputersElectrocardiographyHeart Conduction SystemHeart VentriclesHumansJournal ArticleResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

H V Pipberger, P F Poblete, H A Pipberger. 1975. Computer analysis of ventricular conduction defects.. https://doi.org/10.1159/000397655

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

Evidence of left ventricular contractile asynchrony by echocardiographic phase imaging in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and without clinically evident heart disease.

Left ventricular electromechanical asynchrony has been shown to predict cardiac events in patients with heart failure. This study investigated whether left ventricular asynchrony is present in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) with no clinically evident heart disease and normal QRS durations. Asynchrony was evaluated in 24 patients with DM, 15 nondiabetic control subjects, and 20 patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) due to cardiomyopathy serving as positive controls by conventional tissue Doppler imaging and by a novel method, echocardiographic phase imaging. Asynchrony was significantly higher in patients with DM than in controls and significantly lower than in patients with LBBB. This was shown by tissue Doppler imaging: the SD of time to peak myocardial velocity was 13 +/- 10 ms in controls, compared with 30 +/- 19 ms in patients with DM (p <0.01) and 68 +/- 28 ms in those with LBBB (p <0.001). Similar data were obtained using echocardiographic phase imaging: the SD of phase degrees was 25 degrees +/- 8 degrees in controls, compared with 44 degrees +/- 21 degrees in patients with DM (p = 0.02) and 76 degrees +/- 25 degrees in those with LBBB (p <0.001). Tissue Doppler imaging correlated with echocardiographic phase imaging (r = 0.79, p <0.0001) but was more time consuming (15.5 +/- 4.5 vs 4.5 +/- 2.2 min/patient, p <0.05) and showed higher intraobserver variability (5.6% vs 3.2%, p <0.05). In conclusion, this is the first study showing increased left ventricular asynchrony in patients with DM and no clinical evidence of heart disease.

Bundle-Branch Block↗
PubMed2006

Short-term effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with ischaemic or nonischaemic cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: Patients with heart failure were candidates for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) regardless of underlying aetiology. This study observed the effect of CRT in patients with ischaemic or nonischaemic cardiomyopathy. METHODS: One hundred and forty-two patients with refractory chronic heart failure and left bundle branch block received cardiac resynchronization therapy, 91 men and 51 women, average age 60 years. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was severely depressed (mean 29%), left ventricular end diastolic diameter (LVEDD) enlarged (mean 72 mm) and QRS width was lengthened (mean 147 ms). Ninety-eight had nonischaemic cardiomyopathy and 44 had ischaemic cardiomyopathy. RESULTS: After cardiac resynchronization therapy, the heart function was significantly improved. The mean LVEF increased from 29% to 36% after pacing. In patients with nonischaemic cardiomyopathy, the LVEF was improved from 28% to 37%, and in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy, the LVEF was improved from 30% to 36%. No significant difference of the improvement was found between the two groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac resynchronization therapy could significantly improve cardiac function in patients with chronic heart failure regardless of the underlying heart disease.

Bundle-Branch Block↗