PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 11766480

Breastfeeding by objectives.

A Cattaneo·G Borgnolo·G Simon
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In many countries, the rates of breastfeeding fall far short of those recommended. National plans to promote breastfeeding are badly needed. We describe the results of a breastfeeding promotion programme planned by objectives and financial penalties in a small region of Italy. METHODS: This observational study was conducted in all the maternity hospitals and immunisation clinics of the six local health authorities of Friuli Venezia Giulia, in the northeast of Italy. The regional health authority included breastfeeding in its annual plans for 1998 and 1999, and asked local health authorities to develop local workplans and targets. A financial penalty was contemplated for local health authorities not achieving objectives and targets. The rates of exclusive, predominant and complementary breastfeeding were measured at birth and at 16-19 weeks of age. Data were collected, using standard definitions and methods, at discharge from hospitals and at the time of the second mandatory immunisation. RESULTS: All local health authorities and hospitals set up a breastfeeding reporting system in 1998 and defined breastfeeding promotion activities for 1999. The rate of exclusive breastfeeding at discharge and at 16-19 weeks increased significantly between 1998 and 1999, with a corresponding reduction of complementary breastfeeding. CONCLUSION: Financial penalties may contribute to the promotion of exclusive breastfeeding.

Explore related subjects

Birth RateBreast FeedingData CollectionFemaleHealth Care SurveysHealth PromotionHospitals, PublicHumansInfantInfant, NewbornItalyRegional Health PlanningReimbursement, IncentiveJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A Cattaneo, G Borgnolo, G Simon. 2001. Breastfeeding by objectives.. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub%2F11.4.397

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

Primary immunodeficiency diseases in Latin America: the second report of the LAGID registry.

This is the second report on the continuing efforts of LAGID to increase the recognition and registration of patients with primary immunodeficiency diseases in 12 Latin American countries: Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Honduras, Mexico, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Uruguay, and Venezuela. This report reveals that from a total of 3321 patients registered, the most common form of primary immunodeficiency disease was predominantly antibody deficiency (53.2%) with IgA deficiency reported as the most frequent phenotype. This category was followed by 22.6% other well-defined ID syndromes, 9.5% combined T- and B-cell inmunodeficiency, 8.6% phagocytic disorders, 3.3% diseases of immune dysregulation, and 2.8% complement deficiencies. All countries that participated in the first publication in 1998 reported an increase in registered primary immunodeficiency cases, ranging between 10 and 80%. A comparison of the estimated minimal incidence of X-linked agammaglobulinemia, chronic granulomatous disease, and severe combined immunodeficiency between the first report and the present one shows an increase in the reporting of these diseases in all countries. In this report, the estimated minimal incidence of chronic granulomatous disease was between 0.72 and 1.26 cases per 100,000 births in Argentina, Chile, Costa Rica, and Uruguay and the incidence of severe combined immunodeficiency was 1.28 and 3.79 per 100,000 births in Chile and Costa Rica, respectively. However, these diseases are underreported in other participating countries. In addition to a better diagnosis of primary immunodeficiency diseases, more work on improving the registration of patients by each participating country and by countries that have not yet joined LAGID is still needed.

Birth Rate↗