PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11993703

Classification in anatomic pathology.

Abstract

Classification is the activity that allows pathologists to arrange the bewildering morphologic manifestations of disease into comprehensible order Ideally, our precise diagnoses would each be based on some timeless biological law of nature, and these diagnoses would group together patients with identical clinical manifestations and responses to therapy. However, in spite of the amazing success of pathology classification, it is apparent to everyone that diagnostic disagreements are common, and that patients who exactly fit into a diagnostic category often have markedly different disease courses and responses to therapy. At this time, it is unclear how quickly the potential of genomic medicine will be translated into revolutionary changes in pathology classification. However, it is clear that the rules of classification are part of the foundation of diagnostic pathology and that there is a high likelihood that pathology classification will undergo substantial changes in the next few years. This article reviews the topic of classification for pathologists who will practice during these interesting times.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

E Foucar. 2001. Classification in anatomic pathology.. https://doi.org/10.1309/1xup-75h4-qkh9-yb8u

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Scrape cytology of the ovaries: potential role in intraoperative consultation of ovarian lesions.

Intraoperative diagnosis of ovarian lesions can be achieved by gross examination with the help of frozen sections and/or cytologic examination. Various cytologic techniques, including imprint, fine-needle aspiration, and scrape, may be used. In this study, we evaluated the application of scrape cytology in the diagnosis of ovarian lesions occurring during a 16-mo period at one institution. The cytologic diagnosis was primarily based on findings in air-dried, Diff-Quik-stained smears in correlation with clinical and intraoperative findings. In total, 131 histologically proven ovarian lesions, including 13 nonneoplastic lesions, 47 benign tumors, 17 epithelial tumors of low malignant potential (LMP), and 54 malignant tumors (35 primary, 1 leukemia, and 18 metastases), were cytologically examined. The accuracy of scrape cytology was 95% in the benign, 47% in the LMP, and 98% in the malignant group. In the LMP group, the false-negative rate was 12%, while the deferred rate and false-positive rate were 24% and 18%, respectively. There was no misdiagnosis between the benign and malignant categories. The histologic subtypes were correctly predicted in 78% of cases. There were limitations of scrape cytology in the diagnosis of LMP and mucinous tumors, which require histologic architectural evaluation and adequate histologic sampling. Scrape cytology is a simple, rapid, and inexpensive adjunctive technique that should be used in intraoperative consultation for ovarian lesions.

Cytodiagnosis↗

Effect of circulation and discussion of cervical smears on agreement between laboratories.

The study objective was assessing whether circulation of smears and discussion of those with differing interpretation can increase reproducibility between laboratories. The study included: the blind interpretation of a first set of 194 smears among seven laboratories, the discussion of smears with discrepant diagnoses during the previous phase and the blind interpretation of a second set of smears of same size and characteristics. After discussions, the overall weighted kappa increased in five laboratories (substantially in three : +50%, +27% and +20%). However, no change was observed in one laboratory and a slight decrease (-4%) in another. The latter interpreted the second set of smears at a longer time interval from discussions. Agreement improved for all diagnostic classes except low grade intraepithelial neoplasia (LSIL). Overall, the intervention increased diagnostic agreement, but its effect varied with laboratory and by diagnostic class and could be transient. Continued programmes of smear exchange and discussion appear to be advisable.

Cytodiagnosis↗