PubMed · 12178831
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
USSR. Tsentral'noe Statisticheskoe Upravlenie. 1986. [Statistical materials].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12178831/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
OBJECTIVE: To assess the neonatal morbidity of second twins. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study in a department of perinatalogy. The neonatal morbidity of second twins was compared to that of a low-risk population: singletons in the cephalic presentation delivered vaginally. RESULTS: Five hundred fifty-nine second twins and 18,061 vaginally delivered singletons in the cephalic presentation were studied. Of 452 (81%) second twins delivered vaginally, 310 (69%) were extracted using obstetrical maneuvers: internal version and breech extraction, breech extraction alone, or assisted breech delivery if the breech was already engaged. Before 33 weeks of gestation, there was no significant difference between the neonatal morbidity of the vaginally delivered second twins and the vaginally delivered singletons in the cephalic presentation. After 33 weeks of gestation, only the 1-min Apgar score <7 and the rate of intubation at birth were significantly higher in the second twins. Whatever the gestational age, there was no significant difference between the neonatal morbidity of the vaginally delivered second twins and that of the second twins born by cesarean section before labor. At comparable gestational ages, there was no significant difference between the death rate of the vaginally delivered second twins and that in the reference population. CONCLUSION: The neonatal morbidity of second twins was comparable to that of a low-risk population. Immediate management of the vaginally delivered second twins was, however, more intensive than that of vaginally delivered singletons in the cephalic presentation. It, therefore, requires appropriate equipment in a suitable obstetric-pediatric setting.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Genetic susceptibility plays an important role in the predisposition to inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), but genetics alone cannot explain the six- to eightfold rise in incidence accompanying postwar socioeconomic changes in developed countries. It is presently unclear how environmental factors either trigger or modify the risk for and course of IBD in the presence of genetic susceptibility. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated 2,351 consecutive responses from IBD patients and from 3,364 of their unaffected first-degree relatives (parents/siblings) who completed a multi-item questionnaire with their physicians as part of a study of IBD genetics. All single-patient families were excluded from the analysis to avoid ascertainment bias, resulting in 120-133 independent cases for the analysis of environmental factors and 1,685 patients to be included in the analysis of birth rank. RESULTS: No statistically significant association was observed between the presence of IBD and the availability of either (warm) tap water, water toilets, or central heating during childhood. However, higher birth rank (> or =3) was significantly associated with a lower risk of IBD (odds ratio 0.68). CONCLUSION: Lower birth rank as a possible indicator of increased childhood infection exposure was associated with a higher risk for IBD. Future studies need to address the interaction of known genetic variations (e.g., in the NOD2 gene) with environmental factors potentially mediating this effect.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.