PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12389232

What can we learn from explanted endovascular devices?

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the durability of the Stentor and Vanguard endovascular devices in human implants. METHODS: The textile covering, the polypropylene ligatures and the stent metal of 34 devices (25 Stentor, 9 Vanguard) with a mean duration of implantation of 28.8 +/- 16 months was examined by means of stereomicroscopy and scanning electron microscopy. RESULTS: The polyester textile covering showed gaps along the sutured seam and isolated holes in the fabric. All of the examined polypropylene ligatures were worn, some ruptured. Four different types of stent corrosion were classified--pits (100%), bizarre craters (68%), large deficiencies (14%) and fractures (32%). CONCLUSION: Holes in the polyester fabric and frame dislocations are specific for the design of Stentor and Vanguard grafts. The early corrosion of the stent metal Nitinol in these devices is surprising. Until more experience is gained with other devices, we have to be reminded, that the "gold standard" for the long-term durability of artificial vascular grafts is still "today's" conventional graft.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G Riepe, C Heintz, E Kaiser, N Chakfé, M Morlock, M Delling, H Imig. 2002. What can we learn from explanted endovascular devices?. https://doi.org/10.1053/ejvs.2002.1677

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Leiomyosarcoma of the superior mesenteric vein: a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge.

We report here a case of a very rare entity, a leiomyosarcoma of the mesentericoportal trunk, which was initially misdiagnosed as an unresectable pancreatic cancer invading the mesenteric vein, and which was finally treated by pancreatectomy with mesentericoportal reconstruction. The pitfalls of diagnosis and modalities of resection are discussed.

Blood Vessel Prosthesis↗

The evidence for cerebral protection: an analysis and summary of the literature.

It has been considered likely that the majority of cerebral ischaemic episodes following carotid artery stenting are due to cerebral embolisation. It is intuitive therefore, to attempt to prevent these presumptive emboli, whether they are comprised of air or formed elements, from reaching the brain. Various pharmacological and mechanical solutions are being used. The available literature is hampered by comparisons against historical controls of unprotected CAS with many confounding variables that may influence outcome. There is no clinical Level-I evidence to support the use of protection devices but Level-III and Level-IV evidence suggest benefit.

Blood Vessel Prosthesis↗