PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12709030

Consensus perspectives on prophylactic therapy for haemophilia: summary statement.

Abstract

Participants in an international conference on prophylactic therapy for severe haemophilia developed a consensus summary of the findings and conclusions of the conference. In the consensus, participants agreed upon revised definitions for primary and secondary prophylaxis and also made recommendations concerning the need for an international system of pharmacovigilance. Considerations on starting prophylaxis, monitoring outcomes, and individualizing treatment regimens were discussed. Several research questions were identified as needing further investigation, including when to start and when to stop prophylaxis, optimal dosing and dose interval, and methods for assessment of long-term treatment effects. Such studies should include carefully defined cohorts, validated orthopaedic and quality-of-life assessment instruments, and cost-benefit analyses.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

E Berntorp, J Astermark, S Björkman, V S Blanchette, K Fischer, P L F Giangrande, A Gringeri, R C Ljung, M J Manco-Johnson, M Morfini, R F Kilcoyne, P Petrini, E C Rodriguez-Merchan, W Schramm, A Shapiro, H M van den Berg, C Hart. 2003. Consensus perspectives on prophylactic therapy for haemophilia: summary statement.. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2516.9.s1.17.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Holiday waistline. Time to consensus: the effect of the stomach on consensus decision-making at large conferences.

INTRODUCTION: The factors affecting decision-making at consensus conferences are not well understood. This paper studies the complex association between time to consensus (TTC) and the timing and quality of food, as well as the self-reported level of frustration (PITA factor) with the question at hand. METHODS: We came, we saw, we ate. RESULTS: There was an association between the TTC and the time to eating, especially lunch. There was a trend to faster TTC the better the researchers rated the food. The speed of decision-making was also increased when the PITA score was high, especially late in the day. INTERPRETATION: Organizers of large consensus conferences need to be aware of these factors in decision-making and should try to use them to get more controversial items voted to their satisfaction.

Consensus Statements as Topic↗