PubMed · 12811175
Implementing home care in Canada: four critical elements.
Abstract
While MacAdam proposes a "national approach to home care#8221; the obstacles to this are well known and substantial. They are the likely cost and the limitations of the federal government s role in healthcare. Building on MacAdam's assessment, this paper outlines four problems embedded in the various home-care service delivery models in Canada: the lack of factual client outcome information to support decision-making, the limited client choice of provider, the perverse incentive of fee for service and the bias against the for-profit provider. The paper proposes that the assessment, classification and measurement of outcomes for every recipient of home-care services be standardized using a proven assessment instrument, such as OASIS-B or MDS-HC, by healthcare professionals certified in its use. The resulting information would be captured in a regional database and available for analysis and research. CIHI would be contracted to manage a national database and to fund the training and certification of assessors. The paper proposes a new service delivery and funding model, utilizing standard client outcome information, different roles for regional health authorities and service providers, and a prospective payment mechanism replacing fee for service. A national home care program may be an elusive dream, but that shouldn't stop experimentation, evaluation and improvement.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
B Richardson. 2000. Implementing home care in Canada: four critical elements.. https://doi.org/10.12927/hcpap..17353
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.