PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12819776

Electrostatic nanolithography in polymers using atomic force microscopy.

Abstract

The past decade has witnessed an explosion of techniques used to pattern polymers on the nano (1-100 nm) and submicrometre (100-1,000 nm) scale, driven by the extensive versatility of polymers for diverse applications, such as molecular electronics, data storage, optoelectronics, displays, sacrificial templates and all forms of sensors. Conceptually, most of the patterning techniques, including microcontact printing (soft lithography), photolithography, electron-beam lithography, block-copolymer templating and dip-pen lithography, are based on the spatially selective removal or formation/deposition of polymer. Here, we demonstrate an alternative and novel lithography technique--electrostatic nanolithography using atomic force microscopy--that generates features by mass transport of polymer within an initially uniform, planar film without chemical crosslinking, substantial polymer degradation or ablation. The combination of localized softening of attolitres (10(2)-10(5) nm3) of polymer by Joule heating, extremely non-uniform electric field gradients to polarize and manipulate the soften polymer, and single-step process methodology using conventional atomic force microscopy (AFM) equipment, establishes a new paradigm for polymer nanolithography, allowing rapid (of the order of milliseconds) creation of raised (or depressed) features without external heating of a polymer film or AFM tip-film contact.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Sergei F Lyuksyutov, Richard A Vaia, Pavel B Paramonov, Shane Juhl, Lynn Waterhouse, Robert M Ralich, Grigori Sigalov, Erol Sancaktar. 2003. Electrostatic nanolithography in polymers using atomic force microscopy.. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat926

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Atomic force microscopy of pea starch granules: granule architecture of wild-type parent, r and rb single mutants, and the rrb double mutant.

AFM studies have been made of the internal structure of pea starch granules. The data obtained provides support for the blocklet model of starch granule structure (Carbohydr. Polym. 32 (1997) 177-191). The granules consist of hard blocklets dispersed in a softer matrix material. High-resolution images have yielded new insights into the detailed structure of growth rings within the granules. The blocklet structure is continuous throughout the granule and the growth rings originate from localised defects in blocklet production distributed around the surface of spheroidal shells within the granules. A mutation at the rb locus did not lead to significant changes in granule architecture. However, a mutation at the r locus led to loss of growth rings and changed blocklet structure. For this mutant the blocklets were distributed within a harder matrix material. This novel composite arrangement was used to explain why the granules had internal fissures and also changes in gelatinisation behaviour. It is suggested that the matrix material is the amylose component of the granule and that both amylose and amylopectin are present within the r mutant starch granules in a partially-crystalline form. Intermediate changes in granule architecture have been observed for the double mutant rrb.

Microscopy, Atomic Force↗

Substituent-control exciton in J-aggregates of protonated water-insoluble porphyrins.

A series of protonated porphyrin J-aggregates of various water-insoluble tetraphenylporphyrin derivatives was prepared by aggregation at the liquid-liquid or gas-liquid interface. Using atomic force microscopy, we observed microcrystalline porphyrin J-aggregates. The J-aggregates have two strong exciton bands corresponding to the B (Soret)- and Q-bands of the protonated porphyrin. Interestingly, the excitation energy of the lower exciton (denoted by S1) markedly depends on the meso-substituents, whereas that of the higher exciton (denoted by S2) does not depend on them. These results indicate that the nature of the exciton coupling of the S1 transition dipole moment can be systematically changed by the substituents.

Microscopy, Atomic Force↗