PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 12857379

Competitive assay formats for high-throughput affinity arrays.

Richard Barry·Tricia Diggle·Jonathan Terrett·Mikhail Soloviev
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The authors describe a novel method for the quantitation of differential levels of biomolecules using unlabeled samples and protein-binding arrays for assessing differential expression. Traditional affinity arrays, whether in microplates or protein microarrays, suffer from a few common problems-a shortage of characterized antibodies and highly variable affinities for those available. Also, the assayed proteins could be present in a wide range of concentrations and physicochemical properties, so that it becomes an onerous task to optimize assay conditions for each antibody-antigen pair. Currently, this restricts parallel affinity assays to a low number of carefully selected antibodies and restricts the development of highly multiplexed parallel affinity assays. A displacement strategy allows the use of a much wider range of antibodies, reducing the requirement for matched affinities. The competitive assays described here also show a much higher tolerance for nonspecific background noise. The range of assayed protein concentrations is only limited by the sensitivity of the detection system used.

Explore related subjects

Antibody AffinityAntibody SpecificityBinding, CompetitiveFemaleHumansHydrogel, Polyethylene Glycol DimethacrylateImmunoassayKidneyMass ScreeningOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisOvaryProtein BindingReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Richard Barry, Tricia Diggle, Jonathan Terrett, Mikhail Soloviev. 2003. Competitive assay formats for high-throughput affinity arrays.. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087057103008003003

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Binding capacity differences for antibodies and Fc-fusion proteins on protein A chromatographic materials.

A range of studies were carried out to investigate the underlying reason for differences in dynamic binding capacities observed with various antibodies and Fc-fusion proteins during Protein A chromatography. Dynamic binding capacities were determined for these biomolecules using different protein A stationary phase materials. SEC was carried out to determine the relative sizes of the antibodies and fusion proteins. Pore diffusivities and static binding capacities were also determined on these Protein A resin materials. Trends in the dynamic binding capacities for these molecules did not correlate with differences in pore diffusion coefficients as might be expected for a mass transfer limited system. Instead, dynamic binding capacities were seen to follow the same trends as the static binding capacities and the apparent size of the molecules. Differences in static binding capacities were attributed to be due to differences in steric factor between the molecules. Solution binding stoichiometry studies were employed to estimate intra-Protein A steric effects while binding to the various domains within a Protein A ligand. In addition, steric hindrance was also found to exist between adjacent immobilized Protein A ligands on the chromatographic surface. The combination of intra and inter Protein A steric hindrances can explain differences in binding capacities observed between various antibody and Fc fusion proteins. The effect of Protein A ligand density on these supports was also examined and the results indicate that increasing Protein A ligand density leads to a situation of diminishing returns for binding capacity due to increased steric hindrance on the resin surface. The results presented in this paper show that steric hindrances can dominate over mass transfer effects in causing capacity variation between different molecules on the same stationary phase. This can lead to the development of more cost-efficient chromatographic stationary phases as well as provide information during the selection of Protein A media for preparative purification of monoclonal antibodies and Fc fusion proteins.

Antibody Affinity↗
PubMed2007

Isolation and characterization of phage-displayed single chain antibodies recognizing nonreducing terminal mannose residues. 1. A new strategy for generation of anti-carbohydrate antibodies.

Phage-display technology is probably the best available strategy to produce antibodies directed against various carbohydrate moieties since conventional hybridoma technologies have yielded mostly low-affinity antibodies against a limited number of carbohydrate antigens. Because of difficulties in immobilization of carbohydrate antigens onto plastic plates, however, the same procedures used for protein antigens cannot be readily applied. We adapted phage-display technology to generate human single chain antibodies (scFvs) using neoglycolipids as antigens. This study describes the isolation and characterization of phage-displayed antibodies (phage Abs) that recognized nonreducing terminal mannose residues. We first constructed a phage Ab library with a large repertoire using CDR shuffling and VL/VH shuffling methods with unique vector constructs. The library was subjected to four rounds of panning against neoglycolipids synthesized from mannotriose (Man3) and dipalmitoylphosphatidylethanolamine (DPPE) by reductive amination. Of 672 clones screened by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using Man3-DPPE as an antigen, 25 positive clones encoding scFvs with unique amino acid sequences were isolated as candidates for phage Abs against Man3 residues. TLC-overlay assays and surface plasmon resonance analyses revealed that selected phage Abs bound to neoglycolipids bearing mannose residues at nonreducing termini. In addition, binding of the phage Ab to RNase B carrying high mannose type oligosaccharides but not to fetuin carrying complex type and O-linked oligosaccharides was confirmed. Furthermore, first round characterization of scFvs expressed from respective phages indicated good affinity and specificity for nonreducing terminal mannose residues. These results demonstrated the usefulness of this strategy in constructing human scFv against various carbohydrate antigens. Further studies on the purification and characterization of these scFvs are presented in an accompanying paper in this issue.

Antibody Affinity↗
PubMed2006

Binding affinities/avidities of antibody-antigen interactions: quantification and scale-up implications.

Bioaffinity interactions have been, and continue to be, successfully adapted from nature for use in separation and detection applications. It has been previously reported that the magnetophoretic mobility of labeled cells show a saturation type phenomenon as a function of the concentration of the free antibody-magnetic nanoparticle conjugate which is consistent with other reports of antibody-fluorophore binding. Starting with the standard antibody-antigen relationship, a model was developed which takes into consideration multi-valence interactions, and various attributes of flow cytometry (FCM) and cell tracking velocimetry (CTV) measurements to determine both the apparent dissociation constant and the antibody-binding capacity (ABC) of a cell. This model was then evaluated on peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs) labeled with anti CD3 antibodies conjugated to FITC, PE, or DM (magnetic nanoparticles). Reasonable agreements between the model and the experiments were obtained. In addition, estimates of the limitation of the number of magnetic nanoparticles that can bind to a cell as a result of steric hinderance was consistent with measured values of magnetophoretic mobility. Finally, a scale-up model was proposed and tested which predicts the amount of antibody conjugates needed to achieve a given level of saturation as the total number of cells reaches 10(10), the number of cells needed for certain clinical applications, such as T-cell depletions for mismatched bone marrow transplants.

Antibody Affinity↗