PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 13743498

Simultaneous multiple tuberculin testing.

Abstract

In experimental work with tuberculin testing-for example, for comparing different testing procedures, for standardizing tuberculin, etc.-two tests are often given to each person. Because of variations in allergy from person to person, such duplicate testing gives a much more precise comparison of two test procedures for a given number of persons than does the alternate use from person to person of two test procedures to be compared. In adopting this method of testing it is tacitly assumed that the two tests in the same person do not interact in any way. The present paper shows, however, that this assumption is not justifiable.The authors describe an experiment in which 611 infants who had been BCG-vaccinated at 2-5 days of age were tuberculin-tested 3-5 months later, 306 of them with a single 10 TU test and 305 with a 10 TU test in one arm and a 100 TU test in the other arm. The results showed that there was a highly significant difference between the two groups, both in the average size of the reactions and in the degree of induration, the single-test group giving the larger and stronger 10 TU reactions.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S R ROSENTHAL, J E LIBBY. 1960. Simultaneous multiple tuberculin testing.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/13743498/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Diversification of U.S. medical schools via affirmative action implementation.

BACKGROUND: The diversification of medical school student and faculty bodies via race-conscious affirmative action policy is a societal and legal option for the U.S. Supreme Court has recently ruled its use constitutional. This paper investigates the implications of affirmative action, particularly race-conscious compared to race-blind admissions policy; explains how alternative programs are generally impractical; and provides a brief review of the history and legality of affirmative action in the United States. DISCUSSION: Selection based solely on academic qualifications such as GPA and MCAT scores does not achieve racial and ethnic diversity in medical school, nor does it adequately predict success as practicing physicians. However, race-conscious preference yields greater practice in underserved and often minority populations, furthers our biomedical research progression, augments health care for minority patients, and fosters an exceptional medical school environment where students are better able to serve an increasingly multicultural society. SUMMARY: The implementation of race-conscious affirmative action results in diversity in medicine. Such diversity has shown increased medical practice in underserved areas, thereby providing better health care for the American people.

Biomedical Research↗