PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 13860100

Small angle esotropia.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D G ALBERT. 1962. Small angle esotropia.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/13860100/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A prospective study of alternating occlusion before surgical alignment for infantile esotropia: one-year postoperative motor results.

INTRODUCTION: Alternating occlusion before surgical alignment has been suggested by some strabismologists as a possible method to enhance the treatment of infantile esotropia. PURPOSE: This report presents 1-year outcome results of a prospective trial of patients with infantile esotropia who were assigned randomly to alternating occlusion or control groups. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Forty-four patients with infantile esotropia were measured at entry into the study, at the time of surgery, at 6 weeks, and 1 year postoperatively. Alternating occlusion was full time and symmetric for those with no amblyopia but asymmetric for those with amblyopia. The control group that did not receive alternating occlusion had occlusion for amblyopia only. Initial surgeries were performed when the patients were between the ages of 6 and 13 months. RESULTS: Overall, the patients showed an increase of 9.14 prism diopters (PD) during a mean preoperative follow-up of 4.2 months. Seventy-five percent of all patients were aligned by the initial surgery. Ninety-one percent of those patients aligned within 10 PD at 6 weeks also were aligned 1 year postoperatively. The results were similar for the alternate occlusion group and the control group. CONCLUSION: In our sample of patients, alternating occlusion does not detectably alter the increase in angle of deviation between the dates of entry and the date of the initial surgical alignment procedure, nor does it influence the postoperative alignment at 6 weeks or at 1 year.

Esotropia↗

Confirmed: there is no correlation between the insertional distance between the nasal limbus and the insertion of the medial rectus muscle--and the size of the strabismus angle in infantile esotropia.

INTRODUCTION: Historical systems of measuring the amount of surgical recession of the medial rectus muscles appropriate to be performed for a given size of angle of infantile esotropia, based upon relative recession measurement from the limbus might have proven to be better than relative recession measurement from the insertion--if a positive correlation were found between the size of the angle of the esodeviation and the distance between the insertion of the medial rectus and the nasal limbus. A search of the scientific literature since 1966 as listed in PubMed (National Library of Medicine, formerly Index Medicus) did not reveal any additional confirmatory study of this type in PubMed. We therefore undertook to perform such a study. METHODS: Using standard strabismus calipers, at surgery for esotropia, intraoperative measurements were made of the insertional distance (in mm between the most nasal point of the clear cornea and, following standard surgical excision of the muscle from the globe, the anterior insertional ridge of the medial rectus muscle of the eye) in a series of 104 consecutive infantile esotropes operated by the author between 1987 and 1991. These data were then graphically plotted as the ordinate with the abscissa defined as the size of the angle of the esotropia measured with the prism alternate cover test the day prior to surgery. RESULTS: No correlation was found between the medial rectus muscle insertional distance and the size of the preoperative esodeviation in prism diopters, correlation coefficient r=0.14, p=0.078. DISCUSSION OF RESULTS: In this large series, the lack of a correlation has credibility as it fails to achieve conventional limits of a "statistical significance" of the difference. CONCLUSION: The lack of correlation between the size of the deviation and the insertional distance offers support for the widespread acceptance and use of the alternative, the dose-response curves based on the mm of recession measured from the anterior ridge of the medial rectus muscle insertion.

Esotropia↗