PubMed · 14090340
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
R PEREZ-TAMAYO, J R THORNBURY, R J ATKINSON. 1963. "SECOND-LOOK" LYMPHOGRAPHY.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14090340/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Umbilical metastases, also named Sister Mary Joseph's nodules, are well documented in the adult population and most often represent an underlying intra-abdominal malignancy, usually a carcinoma of gastrointestinal or gynecologic origin. They are indicative of widespread abdominal disease and are associated with a poor prognosis. An extensive review of the literature reveals only two such presentations in the pediatric population. A 14-year-old male presented with an umbilical mass, which was found to be a metastatic lesion of a desmoplastic small round cell tumor (DSRCT) of the abdomen. The diagnosis of an intra-abdominal malignancy, most commonly a DSRCT, should be considered in the presence of an umbilical mass in a child.
We report two cases of abdominal desmoplastic small round cell tumor (DSRCT) that showed a clinical response to the vinorelbine/low-dose cyclophosphamide combination that has been claimed to be effective for rhabdomyosarcoma. This observation may prompt further investigation into the activity of such a regimen in DSRCT patients with recurrent or refractory disease, with a view to a possible future role as maintenance therapy in controlling minimal residual disease in patients who achieve complete remission with intensive induction multimodality therapy.
BACKGROUND: Desmoplastic small round cell tumor (DSRCT) is a rare, primarily intra-abdominal tumor that has a poor outcome with current therapies. PROCEDURE: We retrospectively reviewed patient characteristics, presenting symptoms, tumor pathology, treatment, and outcome of 11 pediatric patients with DSRCT at our institution. RESULTS: The cohort included 1 female and 10 male patients. Median age at diagnosis was 14 years (range 5-21 years). In eight (73%) patients, the primary tumor was abdominal or pelvic, and in one patient each, it was submental, mediastinal, and paratesticular. Nine (82%) patients had metastatic disease. All tumors showed polyphenotypic differentiation by immunohistochemistry. The EWS-WT1 transcript was detected in six of seven tumors tested. One tumor showed rhabdomyoblastic differentiation after therapy. All patients received chemotherapy; eight underwent surgical resection, seven received primary site radiation, and four received myeloablative chemotherapy with stem-cell support. Three (27%) patients are alive 23 months, 8 years, and 10 years from diagnosis. Two died of treatment-related toxicity, six died of disease. None of the patients in whom surgery and initial chemotherapy failed to induce complete remission survived. CONCLUSIONS: DSRCT is an aggressive malignancy that does not respond well to contemporary treatments, and patients who do not enter complete remission after initial chemotherapy and surgery appear to have a particularly dismal outcome. Patients with localized extra-abdominal disease have a better prognosis, most likely due to increased feasibility of resection. Better understanding of molecular and genetic mechanisms of tumorigenesis and treatment-related changes may contribute to development of more effective therapy for DSRCT.