PubMed · 14396223
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
P BIANCHINI, B GATTI. 1955-03-31. [Relations between dimensional and chromatic perceptions].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14396223/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
OBJECTIVES: The objectives were to measure the color change of varied shades of dental resin composites after polymerization, and to determine the correlation among the polymerization color change and the changes in color parameters after polymerization. METHODS: Eight light-curing resin composites, a total of 41 shades, were studied. Color of specimens (1 mm in thickness) was measured on a reflection spectrophotometer before and after polymerization over a white background. Changes in color (Delta E*(ab)), and color parameters (Delta L*, Delta C*(ab), Delta a*, and Delta b*: value after polymerization - value before polymerization) were calculated. RESULTS: The range of changes in each shade of resin composites was 1.1-7.9 for color (Delta E*(ab)), -7.5 to 2.3 for Delta L*, -6.8 to 3.1 for Delta C*(ab), -0.9 to 1.2 for Delta a*, and -6.8 to 3.1 for Delta b*. Delta E*(ab), Delta L*, Delta C*(ab), Delta a*, and Delta b* were influenced by the brand and shade of resin composites, and there was a significant interaction between two independent variables (p < 0.05). On the basis of the multiple regression analysis, in which Delta E*(ab) after polymerization was set as a dependent variable and Delta L*, Delta C*(ab), Delta a* and Delta b* as independent variables, multiple correlation coefficient (r) was 0.842 and the included predictors were Delta L* [standardized partial correlation coefficient (beta) = -0.760] and Delta C*(ab) (beta = -0.715). This result indicated that the polymerization changes in color and color parameters were varied by the brand and shade of resin composites, and the polymerization color change was caused by the changes in lightness and chroma with the similar power of influence.
About one third of all orchid species are deceptive, i.e., not providing any reward to their pollinator. Such species often have lower visitation rates compared to rewarding relatives. This could result in lower levels of geitonogamous selfing and thus would provide an advantage in term of progeny fitness through inbreeding avoidance. This hypothesis could be tested by comparing the level of inbreeding depression between deceptive and rewarding orchids. However, due to the difficulty to raise orchids from seeds, few studies of inbreeding depression are available, and most are focused on very early life stages, such as seed mass or embryo viability. Here, we present the results from an experimental investigation of inbreeding depression in the deceptive flower-colour dimorphic Dactylorhiza sambucina, from in vitro cultivation to greenhouse soil transplantation. We found strong inbreeding depression at all recorded stages (i.e., germination and survival), with estimates ranging from 0.47 to 0.75. Our study finally proposes a simple and suitable experimental protocol to raise orchids from seeds with high germination rates.
We investigated how achromatic and chromatic cues interact to produce transparency. Observers were shown six-region stimulus displays similar to those used by R. Kasrai and F. A. A. Kingdom (2001) and made adjustments of the color and luminance attributes of one of the filter regions to achieve the best percept of transparency. The dependent measure of primary interest was setting reliability, the reciprocal of setting variance. We wished to determine whether the combination of chromatic and achromatic information leads to enhanced reliability of perceived transparency. In Experiment 1, we measured reliability for achromatic, L, superimposed luminance with color, L + C, and superimposed luminance with polarity-reversing color, L + iC. We found that observers' reliability was highest for the L + C condition, consistent with effective cue combination. In a second experiment, we compared setting reliability for L, L + C, and a new chromatic-only condition C. In the L + C condition, observers were asked to make separate and iterative settings of luminance and color to achieve the best percept of transparency. We compared their settings in L with the luminance settings in L + C and their settings in C with their color settings in L + C. Color adjustments were more reliable when accompanied by luminance information but not vice versa. In Experiment 3, we manipulated the transmittance of the achromatic and chromatic filters separately and investigated how this influences the settings made for each attribute. No systematic influence of filter transmittance on the settings made for perceived transparency was found.