PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 14562148

Joseph Sampson Gamgee.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Marina Morgan. 2003. Joseph Sampson Gamgee.. https://doi.org/10.1177/096777200301100402

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Shelf lives of aseptically prepared medicines--stability of hydrocortisone sodium succinate in PVC and non-PVC bags and in polypropylene syringes.

Parenteral aseptic preparations of hydrocortisone sodium succinate (HSS) are used frequently in hospitals, but little definitive stability information is available. The purpose of this study was to obtain ultimate shelf lives for typical formulations so that they may be prepared in bulk in appropriately licensed facilities. In the first study, the stability of HSS, 1mg/ml, was determined in polyvinyl chloride (PVC) bags and polyolefine (non-PVC) bags, in 0.9% (w/v) sodium chloride at 7 degrees C, 25 degrees C/60% relative humidity (RH) and room temperature in the light (RTL) with storage for up to 135 days. In the second study, the stability of HSS, 50 mg/ml was determined in polypropylene syringes at 5 degrees C and 25 degrees C/60%RH with storage for up to 120 days. Samples from each admixture were analysed by stability indicating high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and were monitored for pH, appearance of solution and container, and the rate of appearance of decomposition products. Shelf lives were calculated using the maximum rate method. HSS at a concentration of 1 mg/ml in PVC bags was stable for up to 41 days at 7 degrees C, 8 days at 25 degrees C and 7 days at RTL. It was stable in non-PVC bags for up to 48, 8 and 6 days, respectively. HSS in polypropylene syringes at a strength of 50 mg/ml was stable for up to 81 days at 5 degrees C and 6 days at 25 degrees C.

Asepsis↗

Environmental surveillance in the operating room.

Environmental cleaning in surgical settings minimizes patients' and health care workers' exposure to potentially infectious microorganisms. This article describes the implementation of an instrument designed to help nurses monitor OR environments, identify problem areas, and correct cleaning deficiencies before patient care is affected adversely. During a six-month pilot test in which the instrument was used daily to compare contamination events in rooms and on room surfaces, contamination events in the ORs decreased. These measurable outcomes helped health care workers develop strategies for proper cleaning and influenced multidisciplinary decision making about terminal cleaning issues.

Asepsis↗

Is bloodstream infection preventable among premature infants? A tale of two cities.

BACKGROUND: Bloodstream infection (BSI) is a significant cause of morbidity and death encountered in the NICU. The rates of BSIs vary significantly in NICUs across the nation. However, no attempt has been made to correlate this variation with specific infection-control practices and policies. We experienced a significant increase in BSIs in the NICU at the George Washington University Hospital and were seeking additional precautionary measures to reduce BSI rates. Our objective was to review policies and practices associated with lower infection rates nationally and to test their reproducibility in our unit. DESIGN AND METHODS: Data on BSI rates in 16 NICUs were reviewed. The BSI rate at Connecticut Children's Medical Center (CCMC) was the lowest among those reviewed. A team from George Washington University Hospital conducted a site visit to CCMC to examine their practices. Differences in the aseptic precautions used for intravenous line management were noted at CCMC, where a closed medication system is used. This system was applied at George Washington University Hospital starting January 1, 2001. Infection rates among low birth weight infants (<2500 g) at George Washington University Hospital in the period from January 1998 to December 2000 (group 1) were compared with those in the period from January 2001 to December 2003 (group 2). Comparisons between the 2 cohorts were made with Fisher's exact test, the Kruskal-Wallis test, and Student's t test. Multivariate analysis was used to control for differences in birth weight, gestational age, central line days, and ventilator days. Analyses were repeated for the subgroup of very low birth weight infants (<1500 g). RESULTS: A total of 536 inborn low birth weight infants were included in this retrospective study (group 1, N = 169 infants; group 2, N = 367). The incidence of sepsis decreased significantly from group 1 to group 2 (25.4% and 2.2%, respectively). The reduction of sepsis observed in association with the new practice was statistically significant after controlling for birth weight, central line days, and ventilator days in a multiple regression model (regression coefficient: 0.95 +/- 0.29). The odds ratio of reduction in sepsis after implementation of the new practice was 2.6 (95% confidence interval: 1.5-4.5). The central line-related BSI rate decreased from 15.17 infections per 1000 line days to 2.1 infections per 1000 line days. The study included 233 very low birth weight infants, ie, 90 in group 1 and 143 in group 2. The rate of BSIs decreased significantly from group 1 to group 2 (46.7% and 5.6%, respectively). The decrease in sepsis rate remained significant in a multiple regression model (regression coefficient: 1.42 +/- 0.35). The odds ratio of decreased sepsis in relation to the new policy application among the very low birth weight infants was 4.15 (95% confidence interval: 2.1-8.3). CONCLUSION: Applying the closed medication system was associated with reduced BSI rates in our unit. This protocol was easily reproducible in our environment and showed immediate results. Serious attempts to share data can potentially optimize outcomes and standardize policies and practices among NICUs.

Asepsis↗