PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15021222

Refractive surgery in glaucoma.

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to discuss the topics relevant to the topic of LASIK in glaucoma patients or suspects. The safety of LASIK and the implications of LASIK on glaucoma diagnostic testing are reviewed. RECENT FINDINGS: Most studies have found no change in the nerve fiber layer thickness or optic disc after LASIK. Several reports of steroid-induced glaucoma after LASIK have been published. Important new syndromes such as the interlamellar stromal cyst have been described. Most investigators, but not all, have found intraocular pressure to be lower after LASIK, most likely an artifact of measurement as a result of reduced central corneal thickness. SUMMARY: The safety of LASIK in patients with glaucoma has not been proved. However, based on the published literature, LASIK may be a viable option for some glaucoma patients. Although not an absolute contraindication, glaucoma is a relative contraindication, and careful patient education and life-long follow-up is mandatory. The clinician must be ever mindful of the important effects that LASIK may have on diagnostic testing.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Thomas W Samuelson. 2004. Refractive surgery in glaucoma.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00055735-200404000-00010

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Do scleral flap dimensions influence reliability of intraocular pressure control in experimental trabeculectomy?

AIM: To compare the effect on intraocular pressure (IOP) of large vs small scleral flap size during trabeculectomy using adjustable sutures. METHODS: Trabeculectomy operations were performed on nine donor human eyes connected to a constant flow infusion with real-time IOP monitoring. Large scleral flaps (4 x 4 mm, 16 mm(2), n=12) or small scleral flaps (3 x 2 mm, 6 mm(2), n=9) were constructed over 0.76 mm(2) sclerostomies. For each procedure, equilibrium IOP was measured following tight closure with two four-throw adjustable 10-0 nylon sutures. RESULTS: Five scleral flaps were thin or poorly constructed; four of these were in the initial seven procedures, implying learning effect. These had a mean absolute IOP of 7.6 mmHg (range 2.7-12.4 mmHg) and mean relative IOP of 28.3% of baseline (range 10-45.8%) after closure. In the remaining 16 good quality procedures, mean IOP was 1.3 mmHg (range 0-3.4 mmHg) after sclerostomy, confirming minimal outflow resistance before closure. Following flap closure mean IOP was 20 mmHg (SD 4.4, range 15.5-29.3 mmHg) for large (n=8), and 18.7 mmHg (SD 3.6, 15.9-25.8 mmHg) for small (n=8) flaps (unpaired t-test, P=0.26). Mean IOP (% baseline) was 71.6% (SD 8.4, range 60.6-86.6%) and 66% (SD=12.7, 46.8-86.6%) for large and small flap groups, respectively (unpaired t-test, P=0.2). CONCLUSIONS: Well-constructed scleral flaps of both sizes were able to support an average IOP at least two-thirds of baseline, and both had similar absolute IOP levels. Errors in flap construction resulted in loss of IOP control. Smaller flap size does not appear to compromise control of early postoperative IOP using adjustable sutures.

Glaucoma↗