PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15058243

[Dental implants in tooth grinders].

Abstract

Bruxism (tooth grinding and clenching) is generally considered a contraindication for dental implants, although the evidence is usually based on clinical experience only. So far, studies to the possible cause-and-effect relationship between bruxism and implant failure do not yield consistent and specific outcomes. This is partly due to the large variation in the technical and the biological aspects of the investigations. Although there is still no proof that bruxism causes overload of dental implants and their suprastructures, a careful approach is recommended. Practical advices as to minimize the chance of implant failure are given. Besides the recommendation to reduce or eliminate bruxism itself, these advices concern the number and dimensions of the implants, the design of the occlusion and articulation patterns, and the use of a hard nightguard.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

F Lobbezoo, J E Brouwers, M S Cune, M Naeije. 2004. [Dental implants in tooth grinders].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15058243/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Functional roles of oral reflexes in chewing and biting: phase-, task- and site-dependent reflex sensitivity.

Because loading during chewing is not totally predictable and jaw-closing muscles are strong and act over short distances, feedback from oral receptors is important in the control of mastication. Information on such feedback can be obtained by studying reflexes in jaw muscle EMGs. This review will deal with the contribution of reflex mechanisms to modifying motor neuron activity during chewing, and the dependency of reflex sensitivity on motor task, phase of movement, and site of stimulation.

Bite Force↗