PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15319626

Esophagitis: optimizing diagnostic yield by biopsy orientation.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: There is poor correlation between gastroesophageal reflux (GER) symptoms, intraesophageal pH monitoring and endoscopic or histologic appraisal of esophagitis in the pediatric age group. To optimize the diagnosis of childhood esophagitis, histologic evaluation of esophageal pinch and suction biopsies after orientation were compared. METHODS: Thirty consecutive children with GER, age range 6 months to 7 years, were prospectively evaluated with upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and biopsy. Three pinch biopsies and one suction biopsy were examined after different methods of biopsy orientation. The suction biopsy orientated with x 10 magnification represented the standard against which the pinch biopsies were compared. RESULTS: After suction biopsy with tissue orientation using x 10 magnification 90% of biopsies were adequate for histologic appraisal. Ninety-three percent of esophageal pinch biopsies orientated with x 10 magnification were adequate for analysis. After pinch biopsy orientated without magnification 90% of biopsies were suitable for histologic appraisal. Finally, in the pinch biopsy group without formal orientation, only 63% of the biopsies were adequate for histologic analysis and diagnosis of esophagitis. CONCLUSION: Orientation of esophageal pinch biopsies improves histologic appraisal and hence increases the diagnostic yield of esophagitis in children with GER. The tissue fragments can be easily orientated in the endoscopy room before placement in fixative.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Nicola Brindley, J M Sloan, W A McCallion. 2004. Esophagitis: optimizing diagnostic yield by biopsy orientation.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005176-200409000-00007

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Non-radical diagnostic biopsies do not negatively influence melanoma patient survival.

BACKGROUND: In fair-skinned Caucasian populations both the incidence and mortality rates of cutaneous melanoma have been increasing over the past decades. With adjuvant therapies still being under investigation, early detection is the only way to improve melanoma patient survival. The influence of incisional biopsies on melanoma patient survival has been discussed for many years. This study investigates both the influence of diagnostic biopsy type and the presence of residual tumor cells in the re-excision specimen on disease free and overall survival. METHODS: After (partial) removal of a pigmented skin lesion 471 patients were diagnosed with stage I/II melanoma and underwent re-excision and a sentinel node biopsy. All patients were followed prospectively, mean follow up >5 years. Patients were divided according to their diagnostic biopsy type (wide excision biopsy, narrow excision biopsy, excision biopsy with positive margins and incisional biopsy) and the presence of residual tumor cells in their re-excision specimen. Survival analysis was done using Cox's proportional hazard model adjusted for eight important confounders of melanoma patient survival. RESULTS: The diagnostic biopsy was wide in 279 patients, narrow in 109 patients, 52 patients underwent an excision biopsy with positive margins and 31 patients an incisional biopsy. In 41 patients residual tumor cells were present in the re-excision specimen. Both the diagnostic biopsy type and the presence of tumor cells in the re-excision specimen did not influence disease free and overall survival of melanoma patients. CONCLUSIONS: Non-radical diagnostic biopsies do not negatively influence melanoma patient survival.

Biopsy↗