PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15800435

Material sensitivity study on lumbar motion segment (L2-L3) under sagittal plane loadings using probabilistic method.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In this study, the probabilistic responses of a three-dimensional finite element L2-L3 motion segment, with and without posterior elements, tested under sagittal plane loadings, are presented. Understanding the effect of biologic uncertainties and variations on the biomechanical response provides an insight into spinal behavior under normal and degenerated conditions. METHODS: The biologic variability of 19 spinal components (nucleus, annulus, ligament, cortical/cancellous bone, endplate, and ligaments) in the motion segment was incorporated using statistical distributions into the model. A total of 2000 runs were performed using Monte Carlo probabilistic algorithms to compute the probabilistic response. RESULTS: This study establishes the relative importance of the spinal components in resisting the loading modes. The results show that for an intact motion segment, posterior ligaments are more dominant than intervertebral disc in resisting flexion moment. In extension, the capsular ligaments were found to be the most influential parameter. The intervertebral disc (ie, nucleus and annulus) affects the angular response of the disc body segment more than the hard tissues (ie, cortical and cancellous bone). CONCLUSIONS: The application of the probabilistic analysis provides a new approach whereby the influences of inherent uncertainties and variations in biologic structures can be studied and the biomechanical response assessed.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Kim K Lee, E Chon Teo. 2005. Material sensitivity study on lumbar motion segment (L2-L3) under sagittal plane loadings using probabilistic method.. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.bsd.0000147658.60961.51

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Double-Axis Maxillary Skeletal Expander Suggests Higher Expansion Efficiency in Early Activation: A Finite Element Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Conventional single-axis maxillary skeletal expanders (MSE) have some drawbacks, such as limited control over maxillary expansion and possible asymmetric expansion between the anterior nasal spine (ANS) and posterior nasal spine (PNS). This report introduces a double-axis maxillary skeletal expander (DAMSE) concept to overcome these drawbacks and enhance the efficiency of maxillary skeletal expansion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five different DAMSE designs were compared with a conventional single-axis MSE. Finite element analysis was performed to analyse their expansion efficiency, stress magnitude and distribution occurring in a simplified bone model. RESULTS: DAMSE outperformed the single-axis MSE and provided better control over ANS and PNS expansion. During early activation, the highest expansion efficiency (31.7%) was achieved by DAMSE Model V, 13% more efficient than the single-axis MSE. This efficiency was increased to 100.8% by combining the DAMSE Model V with midpalatal suture surgery. However, with the simplified bone model, the current study could not demonstrate that DAMSE can resolve the issue of asymmetric expansion between ANS and PNS. CONCLUSIONS: An appropriately designed DAMSE can be a promising tool for maxillary expansion treatment. DAMSE offers more efficient treatment than the conventional single-axis MSE while maintaining similar levels of patient comfort and invasiveness.

Finite Element Analysis↗

Application of a calibration method provides more realistic results for a finite element model of a lumbar spinal segment.

BACKGROUND: An important step in finite element modeling is the process of validation to derive clinical relevant data. It can be assumed that defect states of a finite element model, which have not been validated before, may predict wrong results. The purpose of this study was to show the differences in accuracy between a calibrated and a non-calibrated finite element model of a lumbar spinal segment for different clinical defects. METHODS: For this study, two geometrically identical finite element models were used. An in vitro experiment was designed, deriving data for the calibration. Frequently used material properties were obtained from the literature and transferred into the non-calibrated model. Both models were validated on three clinical defects: bilateral hemifacetectomy, nucleotomy and interspinous defects, whereas in vitro range of motion data served as control points. Predictability and accuracy of the calibrated and non-calibrated finite element model were evaluated and compared. FINDINGS: Both finite element models could mimic the intact situation with a good agreement. In the defects, the calibrated model predicted motion behavior with excellent agreement, whereas the non-calibrated model diverged greatly. INTERPRETATION: Investigating the biomechanical performance of implants and load distribution of different spinal structures by numerical analysis requires not only good agreement with the intact segment, but also with the defect states, which are initiated prior to implant insertion. Because of more realistic results the calibration method may be recommended, however, it is more time consuming.

Finite Element Analysis↗

Finite element-based probabilistic analysis tool for orthopaedic applications.

Orthopaedic implants, as well as other physical systems, contain inherent variability in geometry, material properties, component alignment, and loading conditions. While complex, deterministic finite element (FE) models do not account for the potential impact of variability on performance, probabilistic studies have typically predicted behavior from simplified FE models to achieve practical solution times. The objective of this research was to develop an efficient and versatile probabilistic FE tool to quantify the effect of uncertainty in the design variables on the performance of orthopaedic components under relevant conditions. Key aspects of the computational tool developed include parametric and automated FE model creation for changes in dimensional variables, efficient solution using the advanced mean-value (AMV) reliability method, and identification of the most significant design variables. Two orthopaedic applications are presented to demonstrate the ability of the computational tool to efficiently and accurately represent component performance.

Finite Element Analysis↗