PubMed · 15854863
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
N Barbarito, S Nava. 2005. Apnea while awake.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sleep.2005.01.005
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Bag-valve-mask ventilation in an unprotected airway is often applied with a high flow rate or a short inflation time and, therefore, a high peak airway pressure, which may increase the risk of stomach inflation and subsequent pulmonary aspiration. Strategies to provide more patient safety may be a reduction in inspiratory flow and, therefore, peak airway pressure. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of bag-valve-mask ventilation vs. a resuscitation ventilator on tidal volume, peak airway pressure, and peak inspiratory flow rate in apneic patients. In a crossover design, 40 adults were ventilated during induction of anesthesia with either a bag-valve-mask device with room air, or an oxygen-powered, flow-limited resuscitation ventilator. The study endpoints of expired tidal volume, minute volume, respiratory rate, peak airway pressure, delta airway pressure, peak inspiratory flow rate and inspiratory time fraction were measured using a pulmonary monitor. When compared with the resuscitation ventilator, the bag-valve-mask resulted in significantly higher (mean+/-SD) peak airway pressure (15.3+/-3 vs. 14.1+/-3 cm H2O, respectively; p=0.001) and delta airway pressure (14+/-3 vs. 12+/-3 cm H2O, respectively; p<0.001), but significantly lower oxygen saturation (95+/-3 vs. 98+/-1%, respectively; p<0.001). No patient in either group had clinically detectable stomach inflation. We conclude that the resuscitation ventilator is at least as effective as traditional bag-valve-mask or face mask resuscitation in this population of very controlled elective surgery patients.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Intensive care technologies have led to an increase in patients who are neurologically devastated and deceased. The practical, moral, and ethical situations encountered can be varied and challenging to manage. Decisions and discussions surrounding withdrawal of care, death by neurologic criteria, and organ donation require significant knowledge of the prognosis, ancillary testing, and definitions of these processes. Experience and skill are often required on the part of physicians and staff to guide families through these most difficult of circumstances.