PubMed · 17197775
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Stephen E Lapinsky, Sangeeta Mehta. 2007. ARDS--shake, rattle, and roll!. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ccm.0000251845.70488.2d
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
BACKGROUND: Wound infection remains a common and serious complication after colonic surgery. Although many colonic operations are performed laparoscopically, it remains unclear whether this has any impact on the incidence of wound infection. Subcutaneous tissue oxygenation is an excellent predictor of surgical wound infection. The impact of open and laparoscopic colonic surgery on tissue oxygenation was compared. METHODS: Fifty-two patients undergoing elective open and laparoscopic left-sided colonic resections were evaluated in a prospective observational study. Anaesthesia management was standardized and intraoperative arterial partial pressure of oxygen was kept at 150 mmHg in both groups. Oxygen tension was measured in the subcutaneous tissue of the right upper arm. RESULTS: At the start of surgery subcutaneous tissue oxygen tension (PsqO(2)) was similar in both groups (mean(s.d.) 65.8(17.2) and 63.7(23.6) mmHg for open and laparoscopic operations respectively; P = 0.714). Tissue oxygen remained stable in the open group, but dropped significantly in the laparoscopic group during the course of surgery (PsqO(2) after operation 53.4(12.9) and 45.5(11.6) mmHg, respectively; P = 0.012). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic colonic surgery significantly decreases PsqO(2), an effect that occurs early in the course of surgery. As tissue oxygen tension is a predictor of wound infection, these results may explain why the risk of wound infection after laparoscopic surgery remains higher than expected.
BACKGROUND: Closed suction systems (CSS) are increasingly replacing open suction systems (OSS) to perform endotracheal toilet in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients. Yet effectiveness regarding patient safety and costs of these systems has not been carefully analyzed. OBJECTIVE: To review effectiveness of CSS and OSS, with respect to patient outcome, bacterial contamination, and costs in adult intensive care unit patients. DATA SOURCE: Search of MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases and a manual review of article bibliographies. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized controlled trials comparing CSS and OSS in adult intensive care unit patients were retrieved. DATA EXTRACTION/SYNTHESIS: Assessment of abstracts and study quality was performed by two reviewers. Data were combined in meta-analyses by random effect models. Fifteen trials were identified. No significant differences were found in incidences of ventilator-associated pneumonia (eight studies, 1,272 patients) and mortality (four studies, 1,062 patients). No conclusions could be drawn with respect to arterial oxygen saturation (five studies, 109 patients), arterial oxygen tension (two studies, 19 patients), and secretion removal (two studies, 37 patients). Compared with OSS, endotracheal suctioning with CSS significantly reduced changes in heart rate (four studies, 85 patients; weighted mean difference, -6.33; 95% confidence interval, -10.80 to -1.87) and changes in mean arterial pressure (three studies, 59 patients; standardized mean difference, -0.43; 95% confidence interval, -0.87 to 0.00) but increased colonization (two studies, 126 patients; relative risk, 1.51; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-2.04). CSS seems to be more expensive than OSS. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results of this meta-analysis, there is no evidence to prefer CSS more than OSS.
PURPOSE: To explore the prevalence of normal tension glaucoma (NTG) among patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) and to examine OSAS as a risk factor of NTG. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-one consecutive white patients with OSAS were compared with 40 healthy subjects. All the study subjects underwent blood gas analysis, polysomnography, oxyhemoglobin saturation, and an ophthalmologic examination including visual field, visually evoked potential (VEP), and pattern electroretinography (PERG) and disc analysis with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II. RESULTS: Three of 51 OSAS patients (5.9%) had NTG. No patient in the control group had OSAS or NTG. The severity of OSAS correlated with intraocular pressure, the mean deviation of the visual field, the cup/disk ratio and the mean of the retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (P<0.01 to 0.001). Apnea hypopnea index and intraocular pressure were significantly greater in OSAS patients with abnormal VEP and PERG, compared to those with normal PERG and VEP. CONCLUSIONS: The present study suggests that the prevalence of NTG in our OSAS patients is higher than expected in a white population of the same age and that OSAS may be an important risk factor for NTG. Our data underline the importance of taking an accurate sleep history from patients with NTG and referring patients with sleep disturbance for polysomnography.