PubMed · 1875404
Measuring contraceptive values: an alternative approach.
Abstract
Previous assessments of individuals' values for various contraceptive consequences have employed one of four methodologies: free elicitation, direct ratings, multiple regression, or factor analysis. All four methodologies are flawed because they produce group rather than individual values, relying on rating scales, and fail to incorporate information regarding consequence trade-offs. Axiomatic conjoint measurement is proposed as an alternative methodology and used to determine individuals' values for a selected set of contraceptive consequences at two stages of the family-planning career.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
C A Nickerson, G H McClelland, D M Petersen. 1991. Measuring contraceptive values: an alternative approach.. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00845454
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.