PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 1951785

Patient-therapist codocumentation: implications of jointly authored progress notes for psychotherapy practice, research, training, supervision, and risk management.

Abstract

This paper describes patient-therapist codocumentation, a method of creating and using jointly authored treatment-progress notes. Codocumentation has five basic elements: (1) Patient and therapist agree to share responsibility for documentation of treatment. (2) During the last several minutes of each session, the patient records, by dictation, his or her views about the important issues covered, while the therapist listens. (3) The therapist can then dictate his or her comments, in the presence of the patient. (4) The notes are transcribed from tape-recorded to written form between sessions. (5) The typed transcriptions are available for joint review by patient and therapist during subsequent sessions. Sharing responsibility for documentation of treatment using this method promotes bidirectional feedback between patient and therapist. Several examples illustrate how jointly authored progress notes can help in the management of countertransference, as well as transference components of common problems in psychotherapy. The implications of patient-therapist codocumentation for psychotherapy research, training and supervision, and risk management are potentially significant. Further experience is necessary to refine the indications for, and limitations of, patient-therapist codocumentation.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J H Albeck, C Goldman. 1991. Patient-therapist codocumentation: implications of jointly authored progress notes for psychotherapy practice, research, training, supervision, and risk management.. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.1991.45.3.317

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

In the wake of hospital inquiries: impact on staff and safety.

Mishandled concerns about clinical standards resulted in whistleblowing in four Australian hospitals. Official inquiries followed with recommendations to improve patient safety. In the aftermath of the inquiries, common themes included loss of trust in management and among clinical colleagues, and loss of trust from patients and the community. Without first rebuilding trust, staff will not report mistakes or other concerns about safety. Successful implementation of patient safety procedures requires policies to stress the professional duty of staff to report concerns about colleagues when they believe there is a risk to patients.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

Retrieving the ars moriendi tradition.

North Atlantic culture lacks a commonly shared view on dying well that helps the dying, their social environment and caregivers to determine their place and role, interpret death and deal with the process of ethical deliberation. What is lacking nowadays, however, has been part of Western culture in medieval times and was known as the ars moriendi (art of dying well) tradition. In this paper an updated version of this tradition is presented that meets the demands of present day secularized and multiform society. Five themes are central to the new art of dying: autonomy and the self, pain control and medical intervention, attachment and relations, life balance and guilt, death and afterlife. The importance of retrieving the ancient ars moriendi outreaches the boundaries of palliative medicine, since it deals with issues that play a central role in every context of medical intervention and treatment.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗