PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 2037755

Evaluating the Oregon priority plan.

Abstract

The Oregon priority plan represents an innovative method of reforming its Medicaid program. It would replace the present system of limiting the number of people in the program with one that would, after setting priorities, limit treatment benefits. The strength of the plan is that it would provide all the poor with health care coverage; its potential drawback is that it might put expectant mothers and children at a disadvantage and possibility make some forms of needed care inaccessible to other groups as well. Despite the drawbacks and uncertainties of the priority plant, it deserves to be given a chance to prove itself.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D Callahan. 1991. Evaluating the Oregon priority plan.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb03605.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent shunt (TIPSS) with use of Rösch-Uchida transjugular liver access set--evaluation by CT and its clinical application].

Appropriateness of the Rösch-Uchida transjugular liver access set designed for TIPSS procedure was confirmed, especially about the catheter angle and effective length of the 20 G puncture needle, by CT analysis on three dimensional vascular anatomy of the liver. Clinically, TIPSS using the set was successfully made for two patients, connecting superior right hepatic vein with right portal vein in one patient and middle hepatic vein with left portal vein in another patient with hypoplastic right portal vein. Prior to TIPSS procedure, verification of vascular anatomy on CT images is the key to success of TIPSS in safe.

Evaluation Studies as Topic

[Testing an ultrasonic scanner for determination of urinary bladder volume].

Bladderscan BVI 2000 is a portable ultrasound scanner, specially constructed for determination of bladder volume. We have tested this scanner for accuracy, systematic errors and the training required to use it. The bladder volumes measured by ultrasound scanning were compared with the true volumes. Fifty-six measurements were made. We found the accuracy of BVI 2000 sufficient to determine bladder volumes as either small or large. We found no systematic errors. No special training is required to use the scanner. The device is thus useful in most clinical situations when greater accuracy than indicated here is not necessary.

Evaluation Studies as Topic